Le vendredi 07 août 2009 à 23:27 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk a écrit :
> I can't speak for the future content of
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/Text-input.html, but I will be working on
> the next version of the essay (once the directory structure for images
> in Documentation/ stabilizes), and it should
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Till Paala wrote:
> Hello Graham and John
>
> Graham Percival schrieb:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>
>
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:20 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
>
>
> Eh? Why on earth would the Examples change for diff
Francisco Vila schrieb:
2009/8/4 Graham Percival :
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
I was thinking on annotated SVG examples, which should be created for
the essay BTW -- I believed Till had taken this over a while ago, but I
never got news about this.
Hello Graham and John
Graham Percival schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:20 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
Eh? Why on earth would the Examples change for different
languages? IIRC, we currently have French lyrics, It
2009/8/4 Graham Percival :
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> I was thinking on annotated SVG examples, which should be created for
>> the essay BTW -- I believed Till had taken this over a while ago, but I
>> never got news about this.
>
> Do you mean the annotate
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 07:30 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit :
> So, I have heartburn about regressions on the stable branch as indicated by
> failure to pass the regtest. But I have no heartburn about "regressions"
> that mean a complicated example that uses tweaks doesn't look right any
> more.
I
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 06:58 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Hmm, I suppose this would screw up the cross-references.
Not at all, cross-references are defined in macros.itexi.
> I guess we'll just expect users
> looking at a pdf tarball to open up "general.pdf" first.
We don't care so much
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:00:40PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 01:12 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Fair enough -- but could you add a post-build rule to rename
> > general.info/pdf/html to lilypond.info/pdf/html ?
>
> Not worth the effort. DIY if you like.
Hmm, I
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:20 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > But we don't require them for building the website on
> > lilypond.org.
>
> Inkscape *is* required for building current web site from web branch
> sources.
But it's
On 8/4/09 4:00 AM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 01:12 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
>
>
> Yes, even power users could run lilypond and output-distance on entire
> input file directories and detect changes in formatting. This is a goal
> for 2.14, or more reasonnably
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:20 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> ... at the very minimum, we could omit the news on the home page
> (that would require one macro/conditional thingie in
> general.texi),
I want to restore and fix the RSS feed, so I merge news-* into a single
source file for import i
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:55:05PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:51 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > I thought the website was going to be built from the stable
> > branch? If we're doing that, then let's delete the web branches.
>
> This just made me come to mind
Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:51 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I thought the website was going to be built from the stable
> branch? If we're doing that, then let's delete the web branches.
This just made me come to mind that I'm for not including News in
generated offline docball: if we did, i
Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 01:12 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Yes, but what if somebody reads the LM, looks at the source, then
> accuses us of lying when we claimed "no tweaks were used"? I
> wouldn't blame that person at all!
Of course, I rather meant lilyond-book trickery, which we probably
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:51:55PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:51 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > Well, it depends how you define "tweak". In the LM, we lean
> > pretty heavily on "tweak = \override and \set" (plus others).
> > Some of those examples definitely *
Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:51 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Well, it depends how you define "tweak". In the LM, we lean
> pretty heavily on "tweak = \override and \set" (plus others).
> Some of those examples definitely *do* use tweaks!
>
> I'd rather keep the wiggle room and just say "look a
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:12:54PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 04:19 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > "generated manually" meaning "run make generate-examlpes once a
> > year or so".
>
> OTOH we could be a bit prouder and say on the examples pages something
> like "T
Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 04:19 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:16:15PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> > Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 18:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > > - nobody edits texinfo files in this repo. They are imported
> > > via scripts/update-impor
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 09:16:15PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 18:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > - nobody edits texinfo files in this repo. They are imported
> > via scripts/update-imported.sh from the
>
> I have one first concern with update-imported.sh:
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 18:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Details are in the ADD-TO-CG.txt file, but as a brief summary:
> - nobody edits texinfo files in this repo. They are imported
> via scripts/update-imported.sh from the
> unstable/current/head/master lilypond branch.
> (curre
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 18:13 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> My apologies for being unclear in the past. (and my advanced
> apologies for being unclear in the future, although hopefully I
> won't be unclear about this specific issue)
Thanks, I've been preparing a detailed reply but have be
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:13:12PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> My apologies for being unclear in the past. (and my advanced
> apologies for being unclear in the future, although hopefully I
> won't be unclear about this specific issue)
>
> The web-gop branch now contains lilypond-web-git-repo
My apologies for being unclear in the past. (and my advanced
apologies for being unclear in the future, although hopefully I
won't be unclear about this specific issue)
The web-gop branch now contains lilypond-web-git-repo/. This is
my pretend/proposed separate repo for a "staging area" of web
s
23 matches
Mail list logo
