Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 07:30 -0600, Carl Sorensen a écrit : > So, I have heartburn about regressions on the stable branch as indicated by > failure to pass the regtest. But I have no heartburn about "regressions" > that mean a complicated example that uses tweaks doesn't look right any > more.
I agree with your point, and if I understand it well, it doesn't give a justification for not generating examples from the sources with binary from the sources. However, complicated examples are like real users scores, which shouldn't suffer from the need of syntax updates other what convert-ly can handle, in case we ever allow convert-lyable syntax changes in a stable branch -- IIRC we don't want to, do we? I think changes in formatting that make some tweaks no longer necessary imply should be handled by convert-ly, or alternatively should be pushed to a development branch. Best, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
