Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:06 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Look, I was sole maintainer of the docs for 4 years. A few times,
> I took a look at the build process because I wanted something or
> other changed. Each time, I abandoned the idea after a few hours,
> because I was getting nowhere
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 12:22:02PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:57 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > They complicate the build process
> > even more.
>
> I'm not sure what this means, but it's hard to scare me with the build
> process.
That's the biggest thing th
Le lundi 03 août 2009 à 05:57 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> ok, I'm willing to go as far as adding a single "View sources"
> link at the bottom of the page, which takes people to a
> Snippets->Examples page. Of course, that would require adding the
> Examples to LSR (or at least new/), requir
On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 07:51:46PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 17:26 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > There are *plenty* of lilypond sources available. I really think
> > that adding complexity to the Introduction pages would not be
> > warranted.
>
> Just like
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 17:26 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> There are *plenty* of lilypond sources available. I really think
> that adding complexity to the Introduction pages would not be
> warranted.
Just like free software source code should be reachable from a place
where you get bin
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 08:50:38PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 01:17 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > I thought we were keeping the uploaded-website on a separate
> > branch?
>
> I'm open to other proposals, but at this point I expect clearly
> defined proposals w
Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 01:17 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I thought we were keeping the uploaded-website on a separate
> branch?
The uploaded website is the generated website; as it's generated, it
doesn't need nor deserve to be stored in a version control system, it
should just be uploa
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:13:12PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 juillet 2009 à 21:46 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > I disagree; @lilypond blocks have a few problems for this case:
> > - this is a really "courageous" regression test. Ok, ideally we'd
> > never merge any pat
Le mercredi 22 juillet 2009 à 21:46 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I disagree; @lilypond blocks have a few problems for this case:
> - this is a really "courageous" regression test. Ok, ideally we'd
> never merge any patches that break any regtests, but it happens
> from time to time -- es
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:29:37AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 23:57 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> > I still think the texinfo files should be in master, but perhaps
> > not the generated images, and not some really web-specific stuff
> > like the htaccess.
>
> I
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 23:57 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> I would personally remove the web/, and have things like
> lilypond.org/introduction.html
> lilypond.org/doc/v2.x/
> lilypond.org/download/
> lilypond.org/tiny_examples.html
> along with whatever redirects are desirable.
I
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:45:28PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> I have a naive question with not so naive implications about the current
> shape of docs reorganization: what is the planned directory structure
> for the new web site?
>
> Do we want to make a clear distinction between the site and
12 matches
Mail list logo
