Le lundi 27 juillet 2009 à 17:26 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > There are *plenty* of lilypond sources available. I really think > that adding complexity to the Introduction pages would not be > warranted.
Just like free software source code should be reachable from a place where you get binaries, I think we should provide sources for examples. I'm not against hiding source links as much as possible in the Introduction pages, though. > All the files in input/ and input/mutopia/ (which isn't AFAIK > available anyway!) Huh, many of them are available through examples page! > are getting deleted. Introduction->Examples > is their replacement. > > Yes, there are no complete pieces there, but we already have > *tons* of lilypond input examples available. Where else can you find these particular ones for current Lily versions? > AFAIK that file isn't used at all, so sure! As for <>8 CSS files, > I still think it would be neater in a separate dir, but I bow to > you decision here. It would be neater, but it's worth the extra effort only if it clutters Documentation/ because there are too many files, which I don't think it's the case. Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
