We’d definitely need more opinions, especially from folks like
Werner who have worked on the docs/appendices a lot, as well as
from users: how do they feel about it? How much do they use which
index?
>>
>> I use Appendix E only.
I've now submitted a Merge Request to make the N
> What certainly is confusing is that the navigation bar at the top
> and bottom of
> https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/notation/index.html
> contains a link "Index" that points to App D and not to App E. I
> just discovered it when writing this email, but it seems like a
> "bug" that
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 5:11 AM Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> [...]
> On the other hand, using the search box at
> the bottom of the left column searches the full set of documentation not
> only the current document.
>
The search box is something else that has bothered me. Since the
search box just doe
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 12:46 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > Two more examples.
> >
> > An orchestration textbook:
> >
> > Appendix A: List of Foreign Names for Instruments and Orchestral Terms
> > Appendix B: Ranges of Instruments
> > Bibliography
> > Index
> >
> > A harmony textbook:
> >
> > Appe
> Two more examples.
>
> An orchestration textbook:
>
> Appendix A: List of Foreign Names for Instruments and Orchestral Terms
> Appendix B: Ranges of Instruments
> Bibliography
> Index
>
> A harmony textbook:
>
> Appendix A: Instrumental Ranges and Transpositions
> Appendix B: Lead-Sheet Symbo
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 10:15 AM Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> On 19.12.24 21:29, Trevor Bača wrote:
> > Yes, great. See what everybody thinks.
> >
> > While people are thinking, what do you think about the idea that
> > contents of indices aren't supposed to overlap? (Maybe flip to the
> > back of a f
On 19.12.24 21:29, Trevor Bača wrote:
Yes, great. See what everybody thinks.
While people are thinking, what do you think about the idea that
contents of indices aren't supposed to overlap? (Maybe flip to the
back of a few actual books here to check?)
I was giving my opinion. I don’t think t
On 2024-12-19 21:52, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
We’d definitely need more opinions, especially from folks like
Werner who have worked on the docs/appendices a lot, as well as
from users: how do they feel about it? How much do they use which
index?
I use Appendix E only.
While people are thinking,
Hi all,
> Do you ever use Appendix D? Or only ever Appendix E?
I’m probably not going to be much help here: I haven’t used either of those in
so long (like, a decade?!) that just now I had to go look at them to even
remember what they actually hold.
I use Appendix A from time to time, and App
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 3:59 PM Kieren MacMillan <
kie...@kierenmacmillan.info> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> > I very much dislike that. We use different fonts (via different
> > indexing commands) to provide a clear distinction between concepts and
> > commands, and LilyPond's clean naming schemes for p
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 3:52 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >> We’d definitely need more opinions, especially from folks like
> >> Werner who have worked on the docs/appendices a lot, as well as
> >> from users: how do they feel about it? How much do they use which
> >> index?
>
> I use Appendix E
>> I very much dislike that. We use different fonts (via different
>> indexing commands) to provide a clear distinction between concepts
>> and commands, and LilyPond's clean naming schemes for properties,
>> context, engravers, etc., should additionally help a user to find
>> the stuff he or she
Hi all,
> I very much dislike that. We use different fonts (via different
> indexing commands) to provide a clear distinction between concepts and
> commands, and LilyPond's clean naming schemes for properties, context,
> engravers, etc., should additionally help a user to find the stuff he
> or
>> We’d definitely need more opinions, especially from folks like
>> Werner who have worked on the docs/appendices a lot, as well as
>> from users: how do they feel about it? How much do they use which
>> index?
I use Appendix E only.
> While people are thinking, what do you think about the idea
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 6:19 AM Simon Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
>
> I think you’re not wrong, and it’s entirely fair for you to feel that
> way. However, I doubt how common your frustration is.
>
> On 17.12.24 19:34, Trevor Bača wrote:
> > The problem is that the duplication of content between
Hi Trevor,
I think you’re not wrong, and it’s entirely fair for you to feel that
way. However, I doubt how common your frustration is.
On 17.12.24 19:34, Trevor Bača wrote:
The problem is that the duplication of content between NR-D and NR-E takes
a toll on the usability of the docs for many
Hi folks,
When a book has more than one index, the contents of the indices are almost
always disjunct.
If there's an "Index of music examples" and a "Subject index" in the same
book, then the items listed in the first index will almost never appear in
the second index, and vice versa.
NR-D (Lily
17 matches
Mail list logo
