On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:49 AM Dan Eble
wrote:
> My main complaint about the status quo is low sensitivity to changes in
> important details, not how the differences are presented, but if you
> want to try something else, I'm willing to take a look and offer an
> opinion.
>
Yes, that's why we'r
On 2024-10-21 11:20, Luca Fascione wrote:
I might try taking new-minus-old, render that with red ink, blur it a
bit, and composite it with a pale version of the old?
Is there any other presentation that comes to that you'd like to see?
My main complaint about the status quo is low sensitivity
On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 8:05 PM Dan Eble
wrote:
> On 2024-10-20 13:02, Luca Fascione wrote:
> The red/green presentation is good for communicating that there are
> major differences, but bad for communicating what the new image is.
>
Agreed, you never know which is which, I've noticed the same.
On 2024-10-20 13:02, Luca Fascione wrote:
Here's a zip file with a quick demo of the idea:
when you press the button in the right hand side column, the different
pixels stay put, but the text becomes very pale (so that you still have a
sense of where the diff is wrt the overall score).
The red/
> I wonder if I can repurpose the button on the left, and make it so
> that for the right hand side when you press it all the
> "black"/common goes away, and only red/green remain. I'd guess a
> couple on/off would point your attention to the differences, no?
Sounds interesting. However, I hav
Definitely, I'll share a mock up as soon as I can.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024, 06:36 Werner LEMBERG, wrote:
>
> > I wonder if I can repurpose the button on the left, and make it so
> > that for the right hand side when you press it all the
> > "black"/common goes away, and only red/green remain. I'd
Agreed that it feels a bit on the subtle side, yes.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 12:18 PM Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> the blinking comparison
> functionality helps a lot, and which you should definitely support.
>
Absolutely, I am using the same webpage that Han-Wen's script emits,
identical HTML at the
> in terms of showing diffs between two images,
> does this seem like a good way to show what's going on?
In case there is only a very small difference, say, missing staccato
dots, the red/green difference is probably not strong enough (if at
all, I would use the brightest red and green to make
Hi,
in terms of showing diffs between two images,
does this seem like a good way to show what's going on?
[image: image.png]
Render pixels in both images "normally" (ie the intersection)
Render what _should_ be there in green (ie baseline - intersection)
Render what _shouldn't_ be there in red (i
