> in terms of showing diffs between two images,
> does this seem like a good way to show what's going on?
In case there is only a very small difference, say, missing staccato
dots, the red/green difference is probably not strong enough (if at
all, I would use the brightest red and green to make the differences
as visible as possible). On the other hand, the blinking comparison
functionality helps a lot, and which you should definitely support.
> I see the current system takes a different approach with blurring,
> but I figured given I have my hands in there, I might as well see if
> other ways to represent this same information work better for
> people.
What might be helpful is to provide a 'halo' around changed pixels so
that the attention is immediately drawn to the right spot.
Werner
