[no subject]

Hello gentlemen! As a composer who, in 1960s, had written scores with aleatory elements, using notational principles of Polish modern school (Krzysztof Penderecki, Kazimierz Serocki, partially Witold Lutoslawski) plus space notation of early Luciano Berio, and adding my own graphics, I see in LilyP

Re: (no subject)

lyPond-devel" > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 7:57 PM > Subject: (no subject) > > > > Edit to the glossary. > > > > -- > > Michael > > > > > _

Re: (no subject)

Thanks Michael. Pushed to git. Trevor - Original Message - From: "Michael" To: "LilyPond-devel" Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 7:57 PM Subject: (no subject) Edit to the g

(no subject)

Edit to the glossary. -- Michael >From 5e68ed89eb9a1c8bf3e8a76ea74ff45fb6d0ab57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikemoral Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 11:55:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Edit to glossary Edited entry "diminuendo." Added a little blurb. --- Documentation/music-glossary.tely |2 ++

Re: (no subject)

> But one could understand the dashed tie as optional, so this > flat avoids confussion. The first one, yes, but the second one should be never there if the first one is present. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http

(no subject)

El lun, 20-08-2007 a las 07:48 +0200, Werner LEMBERG escribió: BTW, this very example exposes another bug in lilypond: There > shouldn't be a flat on the second ces in the second bar. > > But one could understand the dashed tie as optional, so this flat avoids confussion. With solid tie, you're r

Re: (no subject)

Hi, On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > is there _any_ good reason to enforce html, and not even giving a plain-text eqivalent of your message? Ciao, Dscho ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.o

Re: (no subject)

On Monday 02 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am also interested in the research in tuning systems other than equal > temperament, which allows unusual frequency ratios to be heard in chords > and melodies, which gives composers new possibilities to explore. See also > http://www.midicode.c

(no subject)

rational_music_notation.xhtml Description: application/xhtml ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: (no subject)

Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > 服部 優 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi 服部 優, > > > I'm a Japanese Lilypond user. > > > > So I want Lilypond Documents and Web Site in Japanese, > > and to help and do translate Documents and Web Site to Japanese. > # > > How can I help/do it? > > That's great. May I

Re: (no subject)

服部 優 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi 服部 優, > I'm a Japanese Lilypond user. > > So I want Lilypond Documents and Web Site in Japanese, > and to help and do translate Documents and Web Site to Japanese. # > How can I help/do it? That's great. May I suggest you start with the web site? That has a

(no subject)

Hello. I'm a Japanese Lilypond user. So I want Lilypond Documents and Web Site in Japanese, and to help and do translate Documents and Web Site to Japanese. How can I help/do it? ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gn

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/10/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for the proofs. FWIW I think the very last one -- at 50% of asingle staffspace -- is perfect. The distinction between 52.5% and 50%is particularly fine, but I vote for 50%.What do you think? I also like the 50% circles. I don't think it shou

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are 55% and 57.5% the size of one staff space (that would be about > 12% and 15%

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These are 55% and 57.5% the size of one staff space (that would be about 12% and 15% of the original size). Smaller? I'll send examples that are 52.5% and 50% of one staff space in another ma

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/9/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These are 55% and 57.5% the size of one staff space (that would be about 12% and 15% of the original size). Smaller? I'll send examples that are 52.5% and 50% of one staff space in another mail (so it won't bounce on the mailing list). ...here is

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/5/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/5/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, actually perhaps a touch smaller. Can we run a couple of examples > > at maybe 20% less diameter and see? > > > Will do. I've just cleaned the build directory so I'll have to do a

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/5/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, actually perhaps a touch smaller. Can we run a couple of examplesat maybe 20% less diameter and see?Will do. I've just cleaned the build directory so I'll have to do a recompile (I wont do that until tomorrow, have to work now...) I've attached

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/5/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/4/06, Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (If I felt like being nitpicky, I would point out two things. One, IMHO, > > the circle is still slightly too large. Not much, and arguably not at all, > > > Well, the only real exampl

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/4/06, Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (If I felt like being nitpicky, I would point out two things. One, IMHO,the circle is still slightly too large. Not much, and arguably not at all,Well, the only real examples I've seen is the scans that Trevor sent me... It is no problem to make

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/3/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trevor > > > On 4/3/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I notice that the example at the very end of the first line is quite > > large; I'm assuming this is just a proof to show that magnification > > works correctly?) > > > Yes,

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

I guess this should be ok.ChangeLog:2006-04-03  Erlend Aasland  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    * input/regression/hairpin-circled.ly: new file On 4/3/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erlend Aasland wrote:> Hi Han-Wen>> On 4/3/06, *Han-Wen Nienhuys* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wr

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Erlend Aasland wrote: Hi Han-Wen On 4/3/06, *Han-Wen Nienhuys* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: can't you just use SCM_BOOL_F for the last argument of the circle call? OMG, why didn't I notice that in the first place...! Patch against latest CVS attached. Please ap

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Hi TrevorOn 4/3/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (I notice that the example at the very end of the first line is quitelarge; I'm assuming this is just a proof to show that magnificationworks correctly?)Yes, I was just testing the thickness/height parameters. (Also, nice job on the double

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Hi Han-WenOn 4/3/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: can't you just use SCM_BOOL_F for the last argument of the circle call?OMG, why didn't I notice that in the first place...! Patch against latest CVS attached. Please apply.ChangeLog:2006-04-03  Erlend Aasland  < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>   

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/2/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trevor and Han-Wen > > I've split up the patch in two parts: a "haripin circle"-patch and a > glyph-patch. Both are attached. I've also attached a (rather long) test case > for the hairpin-circled.patch. I consider the hairpin-circled.patch

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Erlend Aasland wrote: Hi Trevor and Han-Wen I've split up the patch in two parts: a "haripin circle"-patch and a glyph-patch. Both are attached. I've also attached a (rather long) test case for the hairpin-circled.patch. I consider the hairpin-circled.patch to be ready for inclusion (the prev

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 4/1/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trevor, and thanks for the scans! I did some work last night, and a new > and better patch is attached. > > I've renamed the property to circled-tip. Height and thickness is now read > from the hairpin properties. The width of the hairpin is

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/31/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > On 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scores > > > of Sciarrino's recent music and I'll hav

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > On 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scores > > of Sciarrino's recent music and I'll have time to dig through some > > this weekend and make a few small

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > On 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scores > > of Sciarrino's recent music and I'll have time to dig through some > > this weekend and make a few small

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Erlend Aasland wrote: Hi On 3/31/06, *Trevor Bača* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scores of Sciarrino's recent music and I'll have time to dig through some this weekend and make a few small scans

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > On 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scores > > of Sciarrino's recent music and I'll have time to dig through some > > this weekend and make a few small

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

HiOn 3/31/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yeah, you've definitely got the idea; the best examples are in scoresof Sciarrino's recent music and I'll have time to dig through somethis weekend and make a few small scans.Great! IIRC I think the circles are a touch smaller, maybe about 80% o

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Marcus > > > On 3/16/06, Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm interested in this kind of 'al niente' / 'de niente' thing, too, > >

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On 3/31/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, it doesn't look bad.  Do you want to work on this further so Ican include the patch?Well, I've actually got some sparetime this weekend, so I might be able to work a little bit on it. - the thickness of both stems should be better in

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Erlend Aasland wrote: I made a quick hack for this just for fun (I'm sure Han-Wen would implement it more properly, especially the font); see the attached patch and test case. (I suspect that the circles are a bit misplaced, but as I said this is just a quick hack). Actually, it doesn't

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Hi MarcusOn 3/16/06, Marcus Macauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm interested in this kind of 'al niente' / 'de niente' thing, too,> but haven't had a chance to figure out the right settings yet.>This sounds interesting

Re: al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

Marcus Macauley wrote: n = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:text #:italic "n." ) ) % This makes the text bold-italic. n = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:text "n." ) ) % In fact, even this makes it bold-italic, as if that's the default text font style. Why? And how to switch it off? because it

al niente / de niente - was Re: (no subject)

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0800, Trevor Bača"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/16/06, Arno Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> dear list, >> >> for a contemporary music score i need hairpin having a circles around >> their tip, indicating cresc./descresc. from/into silence. >> >> what is the

(no subject)

dear list, for a contemporary music score i need hairpin having a circles around their tip, indicating cresc./descresc. from/into silence. what is the easiest way to enter these into the score? or does this need to be implemented yet? i did not find that mentioned in the docs. thanks, arn

(no subject)

For all my questions regarding my problem, do I simply post to lilypond-devel@gnu.org?   Anyway, I was told to install the stable version which is posted at the homepage of lilypond.  Every time I try to install lilypond-2.6.4-1.i386.rpm (This is the stable version) I get these errors:  

(no subject)

[CVS 2005-09-28] IIRC, it was possible to suppress the tagline on a single page piece with \header { tagline = ##f } This apparently no longer works. I now have to say \header { tagline = "" } Any reason for this change? Printing an empty string and printing nothing is not th

Re: (no subject)

ned Kristof Bastiaensen wrote: Hi, About two months ago I had written an improved version of the part-combiner, because the current part-combiner has some serious problems. I had send a patch, which worked for the latest stable release, and the version from CVS. However, after more than a mont

(no subject)

Hi, About two months ago I had written an improved version of the part-combiner, because the current part-combiner has some serious problems. I had send a patch, which worked for the latest stable release, and the version from CVS. However, after more than a month my patch still isn't committed.

(no subject)

Hi. (BWhen I'm processing a .ly file, (BLilyPond (latest cvs) prints this warning: (B(...) (BPreprocessing graphical objects... (BCalculating line breaks... (B[3][6][9][12][15][18][21][24][27][30][33][36][39][42][45][48][51][54][55] (BLayout output to `score.ps'... (B (Bwarning: cannot f

Re: (no subject)

> I think it should be made more clear that the \lilypond{..} form > isn't useful in practise without [fragment], and that there can be > no {} inside. I'll fix the latter hopefully soon. Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

(no subject)

Hi, look at this page: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Integrating-LaTeX-and-music.html#Integrating-LaTeX-and-music I think it should be made more clear that the \lilypond{..} form isn't useful in practise without [fragment], and that there can be no {} inside. if

Re: (no subject)

On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 19:41:17 +0100 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > grep -i todo */* > > Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > > Is there a single source for todos? Or are the todos unseemly distributed all > > over the source? There might be around some `just for fun' hackers who would > > ju

Re: (no subject)

grep -i todo */* /Mats Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: Is there a single source for todos? Or are the todos unseemly distributed all over the source? There might be around some `just for fun' hackers who would just pick up and fix a bug, if the bugs were easily attainable. Greetings, -- =

(no subject)

Is there a single source for todos? Or are the todos unseemly distributed all over the source? There might be around some `just for fun' hackers who would just pick up and fix a bug, if the bugs were easily attainable. Greetings, -- Heikki Junes __

Re: (no subject)

Deborah Lowrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No specific error messages were given on what files > were incomplete via the window error Ok, too bad. > When I looked at the setup.log, a strange thing... > time. (I.E. Wrong size message for > guile-1.5.6-5.tar.bz2 was 112720 actual VS 112566 > ex

(no subject)

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT. I am Mr, Joseph Edward a native of Cape Town in South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with the South Africa MINISTRY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY First and foremost, I apologized using this medium to reach you for a transaction/business of this magnitud

(no subject)

Is it possible to make (untested) \score { \notes < \context Staff = sup < \clef G \context Voice = vone { a' c'' e'' e'' } > \context Staff = sdown < \clef F \context Voice = vtwo { a a \translator Staff = sup a' a' } \context Voice = vthree { f f f f, } > > }

(no subject)

Subject: Re: wrapping long textual markup In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 20.7.1 FCC: ~/persoonlijk/Mail/sent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Of course, a clumsy solution to your problem is to hard-code > >

(no subject)

On Wednesday 31 December 1969 23:59, Chris Jackson wrote: > Bugreports / alternative ideas welcome. Why not have a complete change of behavior within \notes blocks, or within brackets nested within \notes blocks(?) so your .el can be of more use in the rest of the .ly file? Even an extra set of

(no subject)

Subject: Re: Struggling to Link In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 20.7.1 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FCC: ~/persoonlijk/Mail/sent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrot

(no subject)

%Oops. I'm not used to IMP. \version "1.4.9" \header { dedication = "Namo Summaambuddhassa" title = "Joy to the World" composer = "Haendel" poet = "allegro" % poet is not in the same typeface as composer. instrument = "Arr. for Solo Guitar by David Raleigh Arnold" copyright = "\cent

Re: (no subject)

Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Even simpler but still very useful would be to add some intelligence > for the case you only specify one of the stem{Left,Right}BeamCount > properties. Best, ofcourse, would be to allow for nested beam request, so that one could do i.e. [[c16 c c][c c c]] -Rune __

Re: (no subject)

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > I assume that you know about the manual override. (\property > stem{Left,Right}BeamSomethingICantRemember (see manual) ) Yes, but that is too tedious when having lots of stuff like this in the score. > A better solution is to have the initial split be tunable to allow