On 4/3/06, Erlend Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trevor > > > On 4/3/06, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (I notice that the example at the very end of the first line is quite > > large; I'm assuming this is just a proof to show that magnification > > works correctly?) > > > Yes, I was just testing the thickness/height parameters. > > > (Also, nice job on the double hairpins joined at the open circle ... > > your result actually looks more elegant than the examples in the > > Sciarrino.) > > > :-) > > Now we only need a proper n-glyph. (I doubt that I'll have time to do > something with it. Perhaps it is best to sponsor Han-Wen to do that.)
Hm. Maybe we can just use the circles for now? I actually much prefer the new glyphs to the 'n' sign. I found it kinda odd when Han-Wen explained that each new dynamic glyph (beyond the existing f, m, p, s, r, z) has to be done by hand (possibly using mftrace or something?). I guess I was thinking that the dynamic glyphs already existed in some font somewhere ... but on thinking about it, it makes sense that we're not just using, say, BaskervilleBoldOblique 14 or something. Done into the cheese fonts ourselves we preserve the 'look' of the dynamics glyphs regardless of platform, etc. Anyway, thanks so much for open circled hairpins; I say we wait on sponsoring the 'n' glyph for now while we put the hairpins to use! -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
