On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Some “computer languages” are fairly stable. A TeX or C++ program
> written 10 years ago will probably still compile with no
> modifications (notwithstanding the g++ 4.3 header and namespace
> changes). The same is not true of LilyPond; eve
I'm building from scratch on a new Ubuntu install and autoconf is not
mentioned as a requirement:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/requirements-for-compiling-lilypond
Is this an omission in the documentation or a problem with the
packaging (i.e. sudo apt-get build-dep lilypo
2011/3/13 Janek Warchoł :
> 3. I have serious troubles with vertical layout of choral scores containing
> anything besides notes. Slurs, and especially dynamics, tend to make systems
> very high; i struggle to achieve 4 systems-per-page layout, which is always
> certainly possible, but tweaking nee
Thanks!
{dumb typo} * 2
From e154cf8e2e3cbed2a2fed9876d92d57f127637ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:35:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: typos in vocals.
---
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/notati
Just found a dumb typo in my recent edits (regarding keep-inside-line
= ##t). Thanks!
From b5900c53d179cbff1c08e3ff5c78ec2adf14fff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:35:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: typo in vocals.
---
Documentation/notation/vocal.itely
ing a file marked DO NOT EDIT ?
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4243041/
>
> ___
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
From db329c3acaee4d7d0e4b7efa6f8bef98f96aaf45
2011/1/8 Werner LEMBERG :
> BTW, has someone done some research in trying to find printed,
> well-engraved examples?
I've only got one off the top of my head, the final example on this page:
http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-2.html
It's only one data point, but it does argue in favour o
I tried running it on a current development snapshot this week, but it
didn't have enough memory to run nicely and bogged down my computer
with swap traffic (I've got 2 MB here). I gave up on it before it
finished. Does it take long to compile the PDF on your system?
Andrew
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at
I only checked the keyboards part that I helped with, but I like the
improvements. Thanks!
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Warning. This is a monstrously huge patch, with an
> potentially overwhelming number of (mostly) tiny changes.
>
> However, I think it's a worthwhile
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 06:18:13PM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
>> What's the completion status of the essay? Are at least some chapters
>> stabilized enough so that they can be translated, reusing translations
>> of former Chapter 1 Intr
2009/12/23 John Mandereau :
> Hi guys,
>
> In my way of fixing lilypond-book hashing, I'm afraid I'll have to
> revert 4c5a581ca25398669b9ecbc7a606febb09e60214 "lilypond-book: Change
> md5 hashing strategy", because ignoring fragment options for the hash
> which have an impact on music typesetting
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> At last, thanks to help above and beyond the call of duty by Neil, I have
> finally got the autobeam engraver fixed so it beams 4 4 right when there are
> 16th notes in the 2nd or 4th beat of the measure.
Bravo, Carl! I can't really comment
2009/12/4 John Mandereau :
> Hi guys,
>
> Please always check that Lily and docs compile (make all && make doc)
> before pushing, or push to a branch different from master.
>
> /home/lilydev/git/lily/master/Documentation/out//essay/engraving.texi:950:
> Prev reference to nonexistent node `Notation
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> After a bit of experimenting, I think this is the best way to view issues:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?mode=grid&y=Priority&x=Type&cells=ids
>
> Neat, huh? I'll add it to the CG.
Yes! That is very cool. Somehow t
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:18 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> - LilyPond 2.13.5 currently has a vertical spacing problem (no padding
>> between staves).
>
> how about this:
> \layout {
> \context {
> \PianoSta
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Generally looking good. A few comments, mostly minor:
>
> a) Page 2 has the phrase "Not let down, we created a font of musical
> symbols"
> "Not to be deterred," or "Undiscouraged," would be better.
>
> b) Where you compare the
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:12 -0600
>> From: Andrew Hawryluk
>> Subject: Engraving essay questions and RFC
>> To: lilypond-devel
>> Message-ID:
>> <11cc7c4f091
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> Op woensdag 07-10-2009 om 22:18 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Andrew
> Hawryluk:
>
>> Have I missed anything?
>> Please discuss?
>
> What about the bland look of the henle 666 edition of the solo c
Hi everyone, I'm working on the LilyPond essay, and I'm ready to ask
you some questions.
You can read my current draft at http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/essay.pdf
(this is identical to a doc build with my latest patch, except that I
have only updated the pages containing the new essay, leaving out th
Some more work done, mostly on benchmarking.
Andrew
From 6ee065b8eb6ff844b8e093fb6cacd7ac18de4561 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 21:32:25 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: work on essay benchmarking text
---
Documentation/essay/engraving.itely | 123
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What do people think about the doc reorg shown in:
> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/general/Manuals.html
> (and the actual manual pages, of course)
Is it worth mentioning in the essay page that the detailed
typographical exam
The paper block created by lilypond-book includes the line
force-assignment = #""
A git grep shows that "force-assignment" only shows up in two places:
scripts/lilypond-book.py - the source of the paper blocks created
by lilypond-book
Documentation/contributor/doc-work.itexi - and example
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:34:40PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> > All of the @sourceimage commands are causing build problems:
&
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:34:40PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> >All of the @sourceimage commands are causing build problems:
> > introduction.itexi
> > download.itexi
> >
> >I've
All of the @sourceimage commands are causing build problems:
introduction.itexi
download.itexi
I've commented them out to continue my work, since I don't know how they are
supposed to work!
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.o
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:57:26PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>> > Yes. Even though people say "oh, I'd like to help, but I don't
&
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 04:41:34PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> Now the only missing examples are the orchestra one (for which we
>> might want a different image, anywa
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Sure do. So what driver with what setting converts your PDF to the
>>> respective printer language?
>>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>>>>
>>>&
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 7:33 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Long ago I noticed that the t
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:11 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Andrew Hawryluk writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Long ago I noticed that the text in our PDF manuals is fully black,
>> which results in rough-looking text when printed:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/
-screen output is nearly
indistinguishable.)
I'll send this to the TexInfo folks as well.
Andrew
From b2608a3c68f677729d5b72379d18b978b8c6236a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:14:42 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Fix TexInfo PDF output text color
Changed CMKY c
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 05:52:41PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> In the snippet printing-the-bar-number-for-the-first-measure.ly (NR
>> 1.2.5), there appears to be an error.
>> It recommends
>>
>> \set Sco
In the snippet printing-the-bar-number-for-the-first-measure.ly (NR
1.2.5), there appears to be an error.
It recommends
\set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
\bar ""
but the first line gives a warning: type check for
`barNumberVisibility' failed; value `#' must be of type
`pro
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Till Paala wrote:
> Hello Graham and John
>
> Graham Percival schrieb:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:53:51PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>
>
> Le mardi 04 août 2009 à 05:20 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
>
>
> Eh? Why on earth would the Examples change for diff
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:34:01PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> Regarding CG 1.2.2:
>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/contributor/Update-command.html
>>
>> What does "-r" do in "git pull -r"? I don't see "-r"
>> listed as an
2009/8/5 John Mandereau :
> dots.ly before
> dots.ly after
>
> collision-mesh.ly before
> collision-mesh.ly after
I think even this simple case might fail if the dots were placed in
the Voice context:
<< c''4. \\ b'4. >>
In the example that Mark found, the non-aligned notes are certainly
superior
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> After fixing the latest round of bugs (pointed out by Neil Puttock and
> Michael Käppler), I've pushed the changes to git's master branch. That
> is, you should test master instead of dev/jneeman and bugs now belong on
> the bug list instead of i
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 07:55:14PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Le samedi 01 août 2009 à 20:22 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
>> > You're on osx, right? Or linux? I've attached a shell script
>> > that just builds the essay.
>>
>> Plea
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 07:32:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> > Great! Now that that's working, you can delete the web-gop repo
&g
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 12:30:01PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> > 2009/8/1 Andrew Hawryluk :
> >> First question: I've pulled the web-
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/8/1 Andrew Hawryluk :
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Graham
>> Percival wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew, I know that you offered to work on the essay; if you're
>>> still willing, then let's
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> Andrew, I know that you offered to work on the essay; if you're
> still willing, then let's talk. The only real question (in my
> mind) is how much lilypond you want to include, and whether we
> need to drag in lilypond-book for the websi
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Reinhold
Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Juni 2009 15:31:14 schrieb Joe Neeman:
>> A quick update on the new vertical spacing: [...]
>> Anything I've missed?
>
> While the new vertical spacing looks great for full scores (one system per
> page), I have now run int
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Am Montag, 15. Juni 2009 17:25:54 schrieb Joe Neeman:
>> > I've started working on a new system for doing vertical layout i
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On a fresh installation of Linux Mint (and previously of xubuntu, ubuntu,
> crunchbang, and ubuntulite) I can't get the docs to build properly. It's
> taking several "make doc" commands to get each of the pdf files to be
> written, and then wh
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Silas Brown wrote:
> Continuing the thread from November 2007:
> (see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-u...@gnu.org/msg32740.html )
>
> Here is a Python hack that can add numbered notation (Chinese jianpu) to a
> line
> of music. The numbered notation is added
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
>
> PRO:
> + one less branch/repo to track
> + easier to fix typos in the web pages
> + we can direct everybody to look at
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/24/09 4:49 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
>
>> 2009/5/24 Carl D. Sorensen :
>>> Thanks, Applied.
>>
>> Unfortunately, there are two serious flaws here:
>>
>> - keySignature alists which aren't backquoted (e.g., the example in
>> th
HARP))
f^"some text"
\set Staff.keySignature = #`(((1 . 4) . ,FLAT)
((1 . 3) . ,DOUBLE-FLAT))
}
From d60c53f7d8d6b94acc029f5040c69ee48639df26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 20:57:24 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Improved keySignat
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Mats Bengtsson
wrote:
> Quoting "Carl D. Sorensen" :
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/12/09 11:14 PM, "Andrew Hawryluk" wrote:
>>
>>> I think I have figured out issue 708:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/
I think I have figured out issue 708:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=708
Before I submit a patch, how do I decide which LP version this goes
under for convert-ly?
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://
version working. In the mean time, I will just finalize
this short project with LP 2.12.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote Re: recent beaming change?
>
>
>>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Andrew Hawryluk
>>&
My latest LilyPond build (2.13.1, 24 Apr 2009) produces different
beaming than my last build.
e.g. {c''8 c'' c'' c''}
used to produce |_|_|_|
and now it gives me|_| |_|
Was this intentional?
Andrew
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
Good news, I got the docs built!
(I was missing a TeX package.)
AH
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 05:29:09PM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/11/09 5:21 PM, "Andrew Hawryluk" wrote:
>>
>> >
I am trying to build the docs, and I get "pdfetex exited with bad
status, quitting" errors. However, each time I reattempt it, it seems
to get further along before quitting. Does a full doc build from
scratch require numerous build attempts, in a similar way that LaTeX
must be run twice to get its
ically fixed.
>
>
> You only need to modify text in the body of the documentation, including any
> examples that are inline in the docs.
>
> Carl
>
>
Here's the new version with the documentation change.
Andrew
From 404d16892a75df797f0f5c4f893ccbf3fd5b08ec Mon Sep 1
Attached is my fix for bug #729 and a convert-ly rule.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=729
If I can keep finding bugs that simple, I'll be sending patches weekly!
Andrew
From 2311c16f64a21247017cd0dafca5a177f676e506 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Hawryluk
Date: Fr
I've pulled from origin and fixed a bug (don't get too excited - it
may have been the tiniest bug ever):
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=729
I see that the most recent rule is 2.13.0, so my rule should be 2.13.x
where x >= 0. Do I use the current development version or current +
Graham et al,
In the instructions for getting the source code, why not just use
git-clone? Is there a difference? The currently suggested method of
remote-add + checkout produces a bunch of warnings (below).
Andrew
and...@obi-wan:~$ mkdir lilypond-web
and...@obi-wan:~$ cd lilypond-web
and...@o
Carl, when you are working on something, do you commit your changes to
your local repository every day? Would my final patch become a single
commit even if I made the changes in several small commits locally?
(I'm trying to avoid commit clutter on the Savannah repo.)
How often do you re-sync with
I had NR 2.2 and 2.6. NR 2.2 is done and 2.6 has one TBC about
fingerings, which I still intend to address.
Andrew
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> If we get anybody volunteering to do doc work as part of GOP, I'll
> need to know what's happening. What are people current
I can't think of anything you've missed, but if we get another pair of
hands running the LSR, would it be useful/reasonable to have a weekly
or monthly email to -user listing the new snippets?
OR
Could LSR have a "browse by date added" feature added?
Andrew
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Grah
Maybe you would like a dark green based on the main green in your
colour scheme (#7b925a). You could try #3a452b or somewhere
thereabouts.
It's almost hard to believe how much the HTML docs have improved in
the past few months!
Andrew
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Hawryluk wrote Monday, September 29, 2008 1:44 AM
>>
>> I thought of this while writing the keyboards part but didn't say
>> anything because I didn't want to upset th
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Valentin Villenave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, guitar/harp/piano/percussions are a same group in
> orchestras, whereas strings are another group. Besides, harp notation
> is (on a semantic/symbolic level) much closer to keyboards or guitar
> stuff than
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:43 PM, John Mandereau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - the colors are taken from the Monet "Waterlilies" on the LilyPond homepage
>
> I find it a good idea, even if we might decide to change this image:
> it's a small heavily compressed JPEG image, this is not appealing
>
I guess this happens because the Piano_pedal_engraver lives in the
Staff context. The way to engrave your example would be
\version "2.11.57-1"
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff = RH { s4 }
\new Staff = LH <<
{\clef bass c8 \change Staff = RH c'' r4 r2}
\new voice {s8\sustainOn s8\sustai
> Andrew, feel free to suggest a new color for the footer :-)
>
> Cheers,
> John
You could change the footer from #e8ffe8 to #e7efe3 and the border
from #c0ffc0 to #ccd3cc. It looks like the padding/spacing in the
footer could be improved but for now I'm more curious to see Patrick's
design (and o
Sounds good. I'll read through NR 1.5 and 1.6 next week.
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:02:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at Li
008 at 1:43 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 8:27 PM
>
>
>>> Are you up for more doc work?
>>>
>>> Trevor
>>
>> Yes, I'm up for more. I'm a slow doc writer, but I'm willing
> Are you up for more doc work?
>
> Trevor
Yes, I'm up for more. I'm a slow doc writer, but I'm willing. :)
Also, I did go through the "Winds" section during GDP and got it all
cleaned up except the fingerings section, so you can change the "not
yet started" label. I expect to have something to a
Keyboards is done, as far as I can see.
Andrew
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:43:53PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> It is about 80% completed and ready for the first
>> draft.
>
> Just to clarify, I should have said:
>
Here's my initial design submission for the docs - it's just a gentle
modification of the CSS file:
- use "Century Schoolbook L" if available to match the LilyPond output
(Georgia is also a good option)
- links are only underlined when hovered upon
- the colors are taken from the Monet "Waterlilies
I'm done with Keyboards.
Cheers,
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Carl D. Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please hold on Fretted String Instruments.
>
> I'm currently almost done with Predefined Fret Diagrams, which will add a
> section to Fretted String Instruments (and will lead to
On 7/27/08, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, GDP contributors!
>
> Andrew: I know I asked you this a few days ago, but I've forgotten
> already -- are we ready for the second draft? And do you have any
> experience/interest in Winds? I don't have anybody down for that
> section ye
I like the Ravel. Sergei will have to wait another 5.5 years before
appearing in the LP docs.
Andrew
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 23:34:17 +0100
> "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> BTW, I think some of the headwords w
marks are shifted vertically to avoid a collision that can't
happen.
Andrew
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/28 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I will leave the Piano docs as they are with respect to dynamics and
>&g
I will leave the Piano docs as they are with respect to dynamics and
the templates, at least for now. In the meanwhile, I am looking
forward to the New_dynamic_engraver very much!
Andrew
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Neil Puttock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/25 Graham Percival <[EMAIL P
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Reinhold started a recent thread on -user about some problems with the
>> current vertical spacing beh
Reinhold started a recent thread on -user about some problems with the
current vertical spacing behaviour, particularly when stretching large
systems to fill a page:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2008-06/msg00309.html
To summarize, vertical stretching should be smart enough to ad
If its any help, the marks that are centered over time signatures can
be left-aligned by the command
\once \override Score.TimeSignature #'break-align-anchor-alignment = #LEFT
Andrew
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reinhold Kainhofer schrieb:
>
I'm working on the Piano section of the GDP and had a question. The
notation manual includes a template for piano music with centered
dynamics, and there was some discussion a while back about including a
PianoDynamics context in LilyPond itself:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/200
I, too, am in favour of relative as the default.
-AH
On Feb 8, 2008 9:40 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Musicxml2ly supports converting to both relative pitches and absolute pitches.
> The question I have is, which one should be the default? The other would be
> avai
84 matches
Mail list logo
