I tried running it on a current development snapshot this week, but it didn't have enough memory to run nicely and bogged down my computer with swap traffic (I've got 2 MB here). I gave up on it before it finished. Does it take long to compile the PDF on your system?
Andrew On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Lukas Pietsch <lukas.piet...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 11:49 +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Very impressive! Could you try to make it work with the current >> development version? The next steps could then be adding the missing >> glyph shapes to the lilypond fonts, followed by either writing a new >> engraver or modifying/fixing/correcting the existing ones.q > > Unfortunately, I've had some problems getting any other version than the > current standard package from my Linux distribution cleanly installed on > my system (probably I'm just not Linux-savvy enough). I've now uploaded > a test file http://lukas-pietsch.de/Music/mensuraltest.ly and the > expected output http://lukas-pietsch.de/Music/mensuraltest.pdf, with the > same snippets as in the documentation pdf. If anybody could be so kind > as to try and run that through their Lilypond installation? > > I'd heard about the possibility of writing one's own engravers in > Scheme, which would certainly have been the more elegant way of doing > most of this, but I couldn't find it accessibly documented anywhere and > it didn't seem to be supported on the older versions anyway. > Lukas > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel > _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
