On 6 nov. 2012, at 04:51, Keith OHara wrote:
> mike mikesolomon.org mikesolomon.org> writes:
>
>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> So the answer is yes: The height (resp. the depth) is larger for
>>> outside-staff glyphs.
>>>
>>
>> So we officially have a ci
mike mikesolomon.org mikesolomon.org> writes:
> On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > So the answer is yes: The height (resp. the depth) is larger for
> > outside-staff glyphs.
> >
>
> So we officially have a circular dependency: in order to know the height
> (for
Reviewers: lemzwerg, thomasmorley65,
Message:
On 2012/11/05 22:45:06, thomasmorley65 wrote:
On 2012/11/05 22:40:36, lemzwerg wrote:
> Very nice!
Can't review the code.
But from description:
GREAT
It's actually more a fix of a shortcoming. Scheme functions should have
worked in most places
On 2012/11/05 22:40:36, lemzwerg wrote:
Very nice!
Can't review the code.
But from description:
GREAT
http://codereview.appspot.com/6812088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Very nice!
http://codereview.appspot.com/6812088/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Am 30.10.2012 15:10, schrieb m...@mikesolomon.org:
On 30 oct. 2012, at 08:53, Marc Hohl wrote:
Hello list,
several weeks ago, Graham was about to run the scheme indentation
script on the sources – I asked him to wait until my bar line
project has finished in order to make *my* life easier ;-)
Hi,
concerning bug #1594:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1594
Could "s" be used as an empty figure instead of "_"? That would be
consistent with the usual mode where "s" an invisible space/rest. That
would free the "_" to be used for the common task to put something below it.
On 5 nov. 2012, at 11:15, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1
>> compared to rests.1o in the Feta font.
>
> OK.
>
>> The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent
>> (rests.1 versus rests.1o).
>
> From feta20.log, beautified:
On 2012/11/05 10:58:37, janek wrote:
I think it would be helpful to not-so-advanced English speakers if a
word more
ordinary than "gobble" was used.
I am not sure of that. "gobble" is actually pretty established in
programmer jargon:
From The Jargon File (version 4.4.7, 29 Dec 2003) [jargon
LGTM
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/6813079/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I think it would be helpful to not-so-advanced English speakers if a
word more ordinary than "gobble" was used.
Janek
https://codereview.appspot.com/6819066/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
> No, we're talking about the height of something like rests.1
> compared to rests.1o in the Feta font.
OK.
> The question is if these two glyphs have a different Y-extent
> (rests.1 versus rests.1o).
>From feta20.log, beautified:
whole rest 0 7.5 3.12507.5 0
Am 03.11.2012 23:20, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Marc Hohl wrote:
Am 02.11.2012 09:58, schrieb janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6813044/diff/6001/lily/clef-engraver.cc#newcode125
lily/clef-engraver.cc:125: if (ly_is_procedure (formatter))
it s
On 5 nov. 2012, at 10:11, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would
>>> it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just
>>> let the code for rest height in general return the height of the
>>> standard rest glyph without
>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would
>> it be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just
>> let the code for rest height in general return the height of the
>> standard rest glyph without bothering to check the on-staffiness?
I don't understand
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremiah Benham"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:50 AM
Subject: Gub pango-1.26.0-darwin-cx-font.patch
Does anyone know what happened to this patch
pango-1.26.0-darwin-cx-font.patch. I
don't see it in ./patches/ . I built denemo for mingw, darwin, and
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:45, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would it
>>> be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just let the
>>> code for rest height in general return the height of the
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>> Do the different rest glyphs actually have different height? Would it
>> be possible to stipulate that they are not supposed to, and just let the
>> code for rest height in general return the height of the standard rest
>> glyph without bothering to check the on
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:34, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>>
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> On 5
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>
>>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>
>> 1
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:26, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>>
On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
> 1) rest->extent (common, Y_AXIS)
> 2) Res
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>>
>>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>>>
1) rest->extent (common, Y_AXIS)
2) Rest::height
3) Rest::generic_extent_callback
4) Rest::b
On 5 nov. 2012, at 09:19, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>>
>>> 1) rest->extent (common, Y_AXIS)
>>> 2) Rest::height
>>> 3) Rest::generic_extent_callback
>>> 4) Rest::brew_internal_stencil
>>> 5) Rest::glyph_nam
"m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
> On 5 nov. 2012, at 06:51, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
>
>> 1) rest->extent (common, Y_AXIS)
>> 2) Rest::height
>> 3) Rest::generic_extent_callback
>> 4) Rest::brew_internal_stencil
>> 5) Rest::glyph_name
>> 6) Staff_symbol_referencer::get_position
>> 7) rest->rela
24 matches
Mail list logo
