On Jan 31, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Am 29.01.2012 10:35, schrieb mts...@gmail.com:
>> Reviewers: ,
>>
>> Message:
>> The idea here is to create a generic framework that allows for
>> modifications to note lengths (i.e. swing) in the MIDI without having a
>> typographical impact on the
Am 29.01.2012 10:35, schrieb mts...@gmail.com:
Reviewers: ,
Message:
The idea here is to create a generic framework that allows for
modifications to note lengths (i.e. swing) in the MIDI without having a
typographical impact on the score.
Brilliant idea, from my rather amatheurish point of view
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello,
> wiki.lilynet.net is up but looks tabula rasa.
Yes, this is one of those things I've been procrastinating about for
quite some time. I've been trying to upgrade the MediaWiki engine
**and** the database format, and it turns out doin
Hello,
On 30 January 2012 21:27, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
>>
>> Got no answers on -devel, so I forward here (probably more appropriate
>> place).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Federico
>>
>> Il 05/01/2012 13:44, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Issue 1721
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Got no answers on -devel, so I forward here (probably more appropriate
> place).
>
> Thanks,
> Federico
>
> Il 05/01/2012 13:44, Federico Bruni ha scritto:
>
>> Issue 1721 reported that @rlsr{Name} keeps the text in english but
>> translate
2012/1/26 Janek Warchoł
> Hi,
>
> i think the output of beam-shortened-lengths.ly doesn't look good, see
> in current regtests
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/input/regression/collated-files.html
> . Am i missing something?
>
> cheers,
> Janek
>
Thanks, Janek.
I agree. It took me awhile to
2012/1/30 Graham Percival :
> I think there's confusion between Patchy staging-merge and Patchy
> test-patches.
I don't feel confused at all, don't worry about it.
>> i decided to pause my other Lily work and focus on improving
>> Patchy and our development workflow. I took the approach of solvi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 06:56:08PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2012/1/30 Graham Percival :
> > that's ALREADY how it works for the staging-merge.
>
> I guess i mean something different than you do when i say "everything
> gets done automatically".
I think there's confusion between Patchy stagin
> I reworded the text and changed the example. It should now be
> clearer from both text and picture.
Yes, thanks.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "David Kastrup" ;
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
2012/1/30 Graham Percival :
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2012/1/
2012/1/30 Graham Percival :
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>> 2012/1/29 David Kastrup :
>> > So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
>> > development is of concern to you all.
>>
>> My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> Let me just quote one item by screenshot [...]
>
> This looks excellent. However, I don't understand the last sentence.
> What do you mean with `not transferred'?
I reworded the text and changed the example. It should now be clearer
from both text and picture.
<>
--
> Let me just quote one item by screenshot [...]
This looks excellent. However, I don't understand the last sentence.
What do you mean with `not transferred'?
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mai
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 04:39:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
> > My other current concern is to wonder whether lots of people trying to
> > get patchy running might not collide with each other.
I don't think so; once the first set of commits were pushed to
master, I w
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> My other current concern is to wonder whether lots of people trying to
> get patchy running might not collide with each other. As I understand
> it, the key patchy function is to pull patches from staging,
The current state of staging. It does not test individually.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "David Kastrup"
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:35:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
Original Message - From: "David Kast
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>> [Applying rietveld 5595043 to git afb4c5fb]
>>
>>> It means running your own files that use this feature, and reading
>>> the docs to see whether the docs as well as the new incarnation of
>>> the feature make sense to you.
>>
>> It was really good that you have been a
> [Applying rietveld 5595043 to git afb4c5fb]
>
>> It means running your own files that use this feature, and reading
>> the docs to see whether the docs as well as the new incarnation of
>> the feature make sense to you.
>
> It was really good that you have been a pain in the neck, since your
>
David Kastrup writes:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> logical impossibility
>>
>> This is all I needed to know - thanks!
>
> Well, it forces
> sizeof(x) <= 2*sizeof(x)
sizeof(x) >= 2*sizeof(x) of course.
> and we know sizeof(x)>=
"m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> logical impossibility
>
> This is all I needed to know - thanks!
Well, it forces
sizeof(x) <= 2*sizeof(x)
and we know sizeof(x)>= 0, so it is not logically impossible as long as
the structure does not contai
On Jan 30, 2012, at 2:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> logical impossibility
This is all I needed to know - thanks!
Cheers,
MS
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:50PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> The problem is that the file in question is stencil.hh.
>> I got around it by using Drul_array and having the drul
>> arrayed populated with smobified stencils.
>
> I hope that my
> 6e2e1d6a13aba88
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
> Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
>>> I assume it uses the "normal" git cache on my computer
>>
>> Nope. It uses what
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:56:50PM +0100, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> The problem is that the file in question is stencil.hh.
> I got around it by using Drul_array and having the drul
> arrayed populated with smobified stencils.
I hope that my
6e2e1d6a13aba88a3a8eecc0d46f96ad245c152a
didn't mes
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:35:24PM -, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Original Message - From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
> Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
>
> >Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in the LILYPOND_GIT
> >environ
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 02:07:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>
> > "smtp_command: msmtp -C ~/.msmtp-patchy -t" means nothing to me.
>
> That is command for mailing the completion message somewhere. I have no
> idea what msmtp is supposed to be,
ah yes, I forgot about
Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I assume it uses the "normal" git cache on my computer
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in the LILYPOND_GI
On 2012-01-30 12:59, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
defined starting point n
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> I assume it uses the "normal" git cache on my computer
Nope. It uses whatever repository you specify in the LILYPOND_GIT
environment variable.
> - is there any danger if this is also my dev machine with other
> changed files in the git filesystem (e.g. the LSR copies, f
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: somebody needs to run staging before 29 Jan
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:59:57PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
> Don't get confused here.
Hello,
wiki.lilynet.net is up but looks tabula rasa.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I'm not certain that these need to be inside @knownissues rather than
the main portion of the doc, but it's not worth quibbling.
Looks good enough to me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5576063/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
htt
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5520056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/5504100/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
LGTM, although I don't understand any of the pure/unpure stuff.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5569050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:59:57PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Don't get confused here. Don't scare people away from doing the
> > staging-merge by talking about test-patches.py.
>
> I am not sure what the problem is with anybody else running it.
ditto, other th
Graham Percival writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
>> lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
>> defined starting point not relying on whatever happens to b
On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:54 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
> wrote:
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
>>
>> I'm experimenting with the following code:
>>
>> class Stencil
>> {
>> Bo
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:47:11PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> The test-patches.py script can likely make use of the techniques in
> lilypond-patchy-staging.ly with regard to doing an offside build with a
> defined starting point not relying on whatever happens to be checked out
> in the main rep
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:37:58PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2012/1/29 David Kastrup :
> > So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
> > development is of concern to you all.
>
> My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
> operator-friendly, i.e.
> 'run-a
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2012/1/29 David Kastrup :
>> So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
>> development is of concern to you all.
>
> My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
> operator-friendly, i.e.
> 'run-a-script-and-everything-gets-done-automatic
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:54 AM, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
>
> I'm experimenting with the following code:
>
> class Stencil
> {
> Box dim_;
> SCM expr_;
> Drul_array children_;
> ../flower/include/dru
2012/1/29 David Kastrup :
> So seriously: this needs to move to a different computer if LilyPond
> development is of concern to you all.
My work on Patchy (to make it more foolproof and more
operator-friendly, i.e.
'run-a-script-and-everything-gets-done-automatically') will
unfortunately take some
Reviewers: ,
http://codereview.appspot.com/5595043/diff/4020/input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly
File input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5595043/diff/4020/input/regression/tablature-chord-repetition.ly#newcode5
input/regression/tabla
Hey all,
I'm doing some work on the stencil class and I have a programming question.
I'm experimenting with the following code:
class Stencil
{
Box dim_;
SCM expr_;
Drul_array children_;
etc...
}
and g++ gives me:
rm -f ./out/articulations.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/articulations
45 matches
Mail list logo
