2009/6/7 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/6/5 Francisco Vila :
>
>> This minimal LaTeX file spits the error when I try to process it
>> through lilypond-book:
>>
>> \documentclass{article}
>> \usepackage{tikz}
>> \begin{document}
>> Hello
>> \end{document}
>
> The temporary logfile this generates to determine
Neil Puttock wrote:
> -(define (split-at-predicate predicate lst)
> +(define-public (split-at-predicate predicate lst)
>
> Can you amend the docstring for this, since the example given is
> a bit broken (the cons part shouldn't be there):
>
> (split-at-predicate (lambda (x y) (= (- y x) 2)) '(1 3 5
After running
make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
there's nothing in downloads/netpbm/, causing
make lilypond
to fail.
Again, it's easily fixed manually. BTW, did I miss another type
of bootstrap command? As far as I know, I'm following the README
correctly.
Cheers,
- Graham
After running
make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
there's nothing in downloads/libtiff/, causing
make lilypond
to fail:
*** Stage: untar (libtiff, tools)
invoking rm -rf /home/lilypond/gub/target/tools/src/libtiff-3.8.2
/home/lilypond/gub/target/tools/build/libtiff-3.8.2
/home/lilypond/gub/ta
2009/6/6 Jan Nieuwenhuizen :
> I've been present for some months now on #lilypond at freenode.net,
> so I've decided to mention the presence of this channel at
> http://lilypond.org/web/about/index.html
Greetings Jan,
In order to give this channel more visibility, I have also added it on
lilyn
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 12:32:57AM +0300, Yotam Medini wrote:
> Attached is a patch, fixing a build problem.
Thanks for the patch, but this has already been fixed in git. :)
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http
Hello,
Attached is a patch, fixing a build problem.
When making
Documentation/devel contrib-guide.txt
The following error appears:
LANG= makeinfo --enable-encoding -I
/home/yotam/src/lilypond/dev/lilypond/Documentation/user -I. -I./out
--no-split --no-headers --output out/contrib-guide.txt
out
Hi Mark,
This is an excellent question, but I'm afraid I've
reached the point where I'm going in circles. I think
you'll have to ask someone else! But I'm very interested
in seeing the solution.
Thanks for the attempt!
For now I may just riff on adjusting absolute values of some other
NMPC p
Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
path-to-binary thing. But adding this as-is certainly c
Just put an empty tarball somewhere, or download the last set of test
results from lilypond.org
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> I've done
> make -f lilypond.make bootstrap
> without problems, and
> make lilypond
> builds all the arches. The test output tarball is cr
939d350c114854ce026e31eddb07abf73be6840f refs/tags/release/2.13.1-1
$ tags/release/2.13.1-1|head
tag release/2.13.1-1
Tagger: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Date: Mon Jun 1 11:30:54 2009 -0300
commit 457b7a93eec7afdab5c76e99f3f4c151047e3bdb
Author: Reinhold Kainhofer
Date: Sun May 24 17:03:50 2009 +0200
2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
> Hey, Jan was just complaining about patches doing too much, and I
> promised to crack down. If we start complaining about patches
> that are too granular, we'll send mixed messages. :)
I was reminded of Jan's post as I replied to Mark, but I thought it
would be OK s
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
>
> > I did:
> > git tag release/2.13.1 0ac...86a
> > and I can see the tag in my own gitk, but when I push, it doesn't
> > update the list of tags on the web-git page. Anybody know what's
> > wrong?
>
>
2009/6/7 Graham Percival :
> I did:
> git tag release/2.13.1 0ac...86a
> and I can see the tag in my own gitk, but when I push, it doesn't
> update the list of tags on the web-git page. Anybody know what's
> wrong?
Did you do `git push --tags' too?
Regards,
Neil
_
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 07:37:14PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
> > These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
> >
>
> LGTM.
Thanks, applied.
> I don't think it's necessary to have three patches though; can you
> squash the translations into
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
>> suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
>> path-to-binary thing. But adding this as-is certainly can't hurt
>> the
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 06:52:49PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
>
> > Reinhold Kainhofer
> > Better detection which characters need to be quoted...
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=0ac32e91fab38b860ad951b8f0cd4700f79ba86a
>
> This is the re
2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
> These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
>
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn
> #'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-offsets . (0 -15)))
>
> \override NonMusicalPaperColumn
> #'line-break-system-details #'((X-offset . 20) (Y-offset . 4
2009/6/4 Patrick McCarty :
> The "print-book-with" procedure is pretty specialized, but I don't see
> any harm in making it public.
It's a helper function for print-book-with-defaults and
print-book-with-defaults-as-systems, so there's no need to make it
public.
-(define (split-at-predicate pred
Kieren,
This is an excellent question, but I'm afraid I've
reached the point where I'm going in circles. I think
you'll have to ask someone else! But I'm very interested
in seeing the solution.
Sorry ):
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing lis
These overrides in the first example should clearly be \overrideProperty
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn
#'line-break-system-details #'((alignment-offsets . (0 -15)))
\override NonMusicalPaperColumn
#'line-break-system-details #'((X-offset . 20) (Y-offset . 40)
2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
> Reinhold Kainhofer
> Better detection which characters need to be quoted...
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=0ac32e91fab38b860ad951b8f0cd4700f79ba86a
This is the release commit. If you look at the regression test
results, you'll see it lis
2009/6/7 Mark Polesky :
>
> List choices in break-align-symbols docstring.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00475.html
LGTM.
Will apply once I've finished docs compilation.
> Make some local functions public.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05
2009/6/4 Patrick McCarty :
> Any comments for this revised patch? The only things I changed were
> the warning messages.
Reinhold's suggestion for the message is an improvement, so I'm happy
to apply the revised patch.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-dev
Hi Mark,
I'd like to help but I can't get your function to work. I get:
warning: type check for `line-break-system-details' failed;
value `(10 . 10)' must be of type `list'
Can you include a working example?
\version "2.13"
staffAdjust =
#(define-music-function (parser location adj) (
List choices in break-align-symbols docstring.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00475.html
Make some local functions public.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00522.html
If anyone has an objection to either patch, let me know.
Thanks.
- Mark
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> For 'Y-offset adjustments, I'd like to be able to give a
> relative adjustment (e.g., -10 means raise 10 spaces from where
> Lilypond would *normally* put it). Is there a way I can get a
> callback function (giving the "current" position) in order to
> accomplish this?
K
In message <481039.28862...@web83406.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>, Mark Polesky
writes
However, the \a is still showing up as a control character 0x07,
which I'm assuming means "alarm"? It's listed as "bell" here:
http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/0007/index.htm
If you read the standard defi
Op zondag 07-06-2009 om 07:46 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Francisco
Vila:
> whete BTW it also says
>
>bin/gub - the Gub Universal Builder
this is just the one build script. I/we needed an U to make
the name bin/gub here ; possibly that's misleading.
I had the idea of adding
Hi all,
I often resort to explicitly moving systems, using the function
staffAdjust =
#(define-music-function (parser location adj) (pair?)
#{
\overrideProperty #"Score.NonMusicalPaperColumn"
#'line-break-system-deta
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Clicking on the lilypond.org W3C HTML 4.0 validator button yields errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Flilypond.org%2Fweb%2F;accept=text%2Fhtml%2Capplication%2Fxhtml%2Bxml%2Capplication%2Fxml%3Bq%3D0.9%2C*%2F*%3Bq%3D0.8;accept-language=en-us%2Cen%3Bq%3D0.5
Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
I just followed this link and it is checked successfully.
This is because I pushed fixes for those errors. Mark, thanks for the
report.
John
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/m
> Clicking on the lilypond.org W3C HTML 4.0 validator button yields errors:
>
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Flilypond.org%2Fweb%2F;accept=text%2Fhtml%2Capplication%2Fxhtml%2Bxml%2Capplication%2Fxml%3Bq%3D0.9%2C*%2F*%3Bq%3D0.8;accept-language=en-us%2Cen%3Bq%3D0.5;accept-charset=I
Clicking on the lilypond.org W3C HTML 4.0 validator button yields errors:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Flilypond.org%2Fweb%2F;accept=text%2Fhtml%2Capplication%2Fxhtml%2Bxml%2Capplication%2Fxml%3Bq%3D0.9%2C*%2F*%3Bq%3D0.8;accept-language=en-us%2Cen%3Bq%3D0.5;accept-charset=ISO-885
Patrick McCarty wrote Sunday, June 07, 2009 6:43 AM
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival :
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downlo
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, June 07, 2009 8:22 AM
Jay Anderson writes:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scott
wrote:
I don't mind having a separate file for the midi output but not
being
able to factor out the common timing and dynamics costs a lot of
input time and makes it a lot h
Jay Anderson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
Which is kind of ridiculous if you're writing an ensemble piece with many
(even more than one) voices/parts. How can a midi of a multi-voice work
with any repeats be done?
I was working on a large score and original
Graham Percival a écrit :
What's the problem with distributing the website source? I can't
imagine this being technically challenging, and I don't think
there's any security issues...?
And what about copyright? If we distribute the website, Han-Wen and Jan
should decide redistribution cond
Jay Anderson writes:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> I don't mind having a separate file for the midi output but not being
>> able to factor out the common timing and dynamics costs a lot of
>> input time and makes it a lot harder to make sure I haven't dropped a
>> bar s
39 matches
Mail list logo