Graham Percival wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as
suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special
path-to-binary thing. But adding this as-is certainly can't hurt
the next person doing the update, so that's fine.
Yeah, I almost took the OSX PATH out. I used to put it in all of my lily
shell scripts before I figured out that it's better to set things up as
described in AU. Since you lean that direction I wouldn't mind removing
it. Do you want me to make a patch or would you rather do it yourself?
I did it, but now I'm wondering how the script worked at all --
doesn't the lsr tarball put things in separate dirs? Oh wait;
maybe the snippets-all has everything in one dir. Ok, never mind.
Cheers,
- Graham
Right. You cd into the all/ dir and then run it. :)
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
