Patrick McCarty wrote Sunday, June 07, 2009 6:43 AM
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham
Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
Francisco Vila a écrit :
2009/6/6 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
downloaded .exe".
GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You
run the
builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by
their
names.
Agreed. We should call binaries by Lily dev team "GUB binaries"
or
whatever you like that sounds correct, but not just
GUB, which is the building framework.
Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on
the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-
devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly
Interesting. So did the name evolve over time? Now it appears to
be
called the Grand Unified Builder:
http://lilypond.org/gub/
Which makes a lot more sense, since the binaries it produces are
certainly not unified, only the source and the building mechanism
are.
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
