On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 06:00:23PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Graham Percival wrote: >> ok. IMO, osx users should set up a "lilypond" shell script, as >> suggested in AU 2.something. Then you wouldn't need that special >> path-to-binary thing. But adding this as-is certainly can't hurt >> the next person doing the update, so that's fine. > > Yeah, I almost took the OSX PATH out. I used to put it in all of my lily > shell scripts before I figured out that it's better to set things up as > described in AU. Since you lean that direction I wouldn't mind removing > it. Do you want me to make a patch or would you rather do it yourself?
I did it, but now I'm wondering how the script worked at all -- doesn't the lsr tarball put things in separate dirs? Oh wait; maybe the snippets-all has everything in one dir. Ok, never mind. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
