how the emacs- lilypond mode works for recent versions
(Lily:2.6 -emacs:21.3)?
information I got through searches are quite old..
what should I do to have it working under winXP
Best Regards,
Mehmet Okonsar, pianist-composer
www.okonsar.com
___
lilypon
On 30-Jun-05, at 3:06 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
I only applied about half a dozen lines of patches to these files.
Why did
it end up modifying the whole file? What did I do wrong?
I think the CVS diff -> email script is broken when changes are
applied to a non-HE
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
First, I changed the lilypond shortcut on the desktop to run:
C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND.COM /C "D:\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond.exe" >
c:\lilyout.txt
And, when I double-click, lilypad does start up. Progress at last! :)
Does everyone have write permission in the root?
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
(The "open" action is set the same way. The "&Generate PDF ..."
action is set to run lilypond.exe.)
It seems to me that the default action should be Generate, not Edit,
like we did it for Cygwin?
The default action is Generate on WinME - I was just mentioning t
Graham Percival wrote:
On 30-Jun-05, at 1:39 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/lilypond
Module name:lilypond
Branch: lilypond_2_6
Changes by:Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/06/30 20:39:01
Modified files:
Documentation/user: basic-notation.itely exampl
On 30-Jun-05, at 1:39 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/lilypond
Module name:lilypond
Branch: lilypond_2_6
Changes by: Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/06/30
20:39:01
Modified files:
Documentation/user: basic-notation.itely examples.itely
On 30-Jun-05, at 3:22 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
Is there an easy way to apply changes to both branches? I imagine
that
the doc fixes for the next few weeks would apply to 2.6 as well as
2.7.
IMO the easiest most robust way is to edit the 2.6.0 -> 2.7.0 patch by
ha
Hi,
A french article about Lily 2.6 as been published on http://linuxfr.org.
Linuxfr is one of the most important french website about linux and
open-source.
Here is the link to the entire article :
http://linuxfr.org/2005/06/27/19210.html
Gauvain Pocentek
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
>> -chmod 755 $@
>> +cat $< | sed $(sed-atvariables) > $@
>
> Indentation-based languages rulez!!
open-close-character based languages suX0rz!
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien |
I couldn't build the documentation until I applied the attached patch.
However, I'm not sure if this is right, because I don't see exactly your
intention.
Bert
--- Documentation/pictures/GNUmakefile 2005-06-30 22:17:34.56250 +0200
+++ Documentation/pictures/GNUmakefile.new 2005-06-30
Bertalan Fodor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, I had to apply the attached patch to build. It changes spaces
> to tabs, because make said to do so.
>
> Bert
> --- cygwin/GNUmakefile2005-06-30 17:24:06.18750 +0200
> +++ cygwin/GNUmakefile.new2005-06-30 17:16:30.62500 +0200
On 30-Jun-05, at 2:12 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I) Page by page files lily-xxx-1.eps ... lily-xxx-N.eps
II) A single file lily-xxx.eps that contains the full score
Clearly, Graham keeps asking about the I) files, whereas Han-Wen keeps
answering about II) file!
Ah, thanks!
As for why I'm usin
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> some comments.
They're welcome.
> * Couldn't the print-method be added as a property to
> scm/define-music-types.scm for each type? (or perhaps as a list of
> methods?)
Good idea.
> * I think it is better to call the routines xxx-display-yyy
>
Laura Conrad said:
It used to be that you could use any valid lilypond file in
lilypond-book. This is apparently no longer the case; e.g., if you
I think we are talking about \book in general whether in lilypond-book or
not.
Han-Wen Nienhuys said:
As a short-cut, lilypond will collect all
Hello, I had to apply the attached patch to build. It changes spaces to
tabs, because make said to do so.
Bert
--- cygwin/GNUmakefile 2005-06-30 17:24:06.18750 +0200
+++ cygwin/GNUmakefile.new 2005-06-30 17:16:30.62500 +0200
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
OUT_POSTREMOVES=$(POSTREMOVES:%=$(outd
> "HN" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Since only the I) files are used when you run lilypond-book on a
>> LaTeX
>> file, Graham's concerns are completely valid, namely that the height of
>> each lily-xxx-n.eps file is taken from the default settings in
>
Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Hi,
Here is a tested version of a `display-lily-music' function:
http://nicolas.sceaux.free.fr/print-lily.scm
If you think this is not maintanable/good enough for the LilyPond
distribution, then I'll keep it somewhere else.
Hi,
some comments.
* Couldn't the print
Graham Percival wrote:
On 29-Jun-05, at 1:03 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Log message:
Branch lilypond_2_6
(MINOR_VERSION): go to 2.7.0
Already? I thought that we'd work on 2.6.x for a while before branching
2.7.
Experience shows that it is really hard to make changes not break
a
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> Please notify lilypond-devel@gnu.org when you've posted the
> announcement, so we can add them to our regular announce list for
> lilypond 2.8
I've submitted a scoop at slashdot yesterday, but afaik for a software
releases the editors will want to see several submission
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Come on guys, don't you realize that you are talking about different
things. If you read carefully what Han-Wen said 28-June, there are two
types of generated .eps files when you have an explicit \book{..} in a
lilypond-book score:
I) Page by page files lily-xxx-1.eps ...
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 29-Jun-05, at 12:46 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 28-Jun-05, at 6:32 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Unless there is a serious bug, in a lilypond-book document each
page of a \book is output as a lily--1.eps, lil
21 matches
Mail list logo
