Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 29-Jun-05, at 12:46 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 28-Jun-05, at 6:32 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Unless there is a serious bug, in a lilypond-book document each
page of a \book is output as a lily-xxxx-1.eps, lily-xxxx-2.eps
etc. sequence, as well as a single EPS file, whose height is as big
as necessary. The latter is
"whose height is as big as necessary" -- what do you mean by that? The
Big enough so the EPS file encompassess all pages when stacked
vertically.
Is it hard-coded to the size of A4 paper? I haven't tried other paper
sizes,
Like I said, it's not hardcoded at all. The EPS bbox is stretched to fit
all of the pages. If it doesn't work, bugreport please.
Come on guys, don't you realize that you are talking about different
things. If you read carefully what Han-Wen said 28-June, there are two
types of generated .eps files when you have an explicit \book{..} in a
lilypond-book score:
I) Page by page files lily-xxx-1.eps ... lily-xxx-N.eps
II) A single file lily-xxx.eps that contains the full score
Clearly, Graham keeps asking about the I) files, whereas Han-Wen keeps
answering about II) file!
Since only the I) files are used when you run lilypond-book on a LaTeX
file, Graham's concerns are completely valid, namely that the height of
each lily-xxx-n.eps file is taken from the default settings in
ly/paper-defaults.ly, not from the page layout of the LaTeX document.
The single large file II) is used for the HTML output from texinfo,
which I guess Han-Wen uses much more frequently than the LaTeX output
mode, so I can understand the confusion.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
