On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 3:41 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> Would the OSI consider maintaining the new metadata publicly (maybe in
> github.com/opensourceorg/licenses)?
>
We hope to do exactly that and also make it available via the license API,
but that project will need to be staffed and funded
This looks like great work. Thank you Giulia!
Would the OSI consider maintaining the new metadata publicly (maybe in
github.com/opensourceorg/licenses)?
Richard
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 5:53 PM Stefano Maffulli wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> It occurred to me that I didn't announce the completion o
Hello folks,
It occurred to me that I didn't announce the completion of this project to
this list. Doing it now: the project is done! Thanks Giulia for your time.
To recap what has been done:
- reviewed the archives of all mailing lists archives in our possession
(1999 - 2023) and the public boar
Good morning everybody.
This e-mail means to be a quick update on the license-review project I’ve
been working on in the past few weeks.
It aims to create a systematic and well-ordered database of all the
licenses that have been submitted to OSI to be approved since its
foundation, whether approv
Stefano and Giulia,
Thank you for your work on this! The new format looks vastly more useful
than the previous one. It's great to see OSI giving this important resource
the care and tending it deserves.
Best,
Aaron
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 8:49 AM Stefano Maffulli
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at
license was
approved, which may yield information on when it was submitted/discussed, etc.
From: License-discuss On Behalf
Of Giulia Dellanoce
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 3:13 AM
To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 8:42 PM Richard Fontana
wrote:
> I found some minutes from several dates in 2005-2006, the earliest
> possibly being 7 March 2005:
> https://opensource.org/meeting-minutes/minutes20050307/
Thank you! Silly me, I relied on "publication date"... This confirms that
we have t
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Indeed, the license-discuss archive seems to be fairly complete. We
can't find the archives (if they exist) of board discussions where
licenses were formally approved, if such proof of approval existed in
the first place.
Does anyone have a recolle
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 11:17 PM Stefano Maffulli
wrote:
> We can't find the archives (if they exist) of board discussions where
> licenses were formally approved, if such proof of approval existed in the
> first place.
>
> Does anyone have a recollection of how the board approved and kept reco
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 7:00 AM Richard Fontana
wrote:
> You probably already know this: several years ago an effort was made
> to import the early (Russ Nelson's crynwr.com-hosted) license-discuss
> archives to lists.opensource.org, and so you can see the results at
> http://lists.opensource.org/
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:13 AM Giulia Dellanoce wrote:
>
> Good morning everybody and thank you Stefano for such a nice introduction.
> Being quite a neophyte to the world of open source software licenses, I am
> getting more and more interested in the subject as I am moving forward with
> the p
Good morning everybody and thank you Stefano for such a nice introduction.
Being quite a neophyte to the world of open source software licenses, I am
getting more and more interested in the subject as I am moving forward with
the project, and I really want to do my best to make my internship at OSI
Hello folks,
The OSI announced today that we started cleaning up the list of Approved
Licenses published on opensource.org thanks to an intern, Giulia Dellanoce.
With the migration to the new website, we moved the list from simple web
pages[1] to a structured and consistent approach.
The new site
13 matches
Mail list logo
