Carlo Wood wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
-export-dynamic is to export symbols from an application so that they are
available to runtime loaded c
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:07:37PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >>On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> >>>I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
>
> >>I do believe that exp
Carlo Wood wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
I do believe that exports symbols from a shared lib. He has static libs.
It should also export symbols
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:00:00PM -0700, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> > I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
>
> I do believe that exports symbols from a shared lib. He has static libs.
>
> whole_archive_flag_spec is the va
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
If that is true, then it is broken.
--
Carlo Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/
On 2004-08-12T09:00+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > On 2004-08-11T10:06+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) > ) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > ) > > libtool-1.4.2-demo.patch (on x86_64 s390 s390x)
) > ) > Yes, this is just to disable several nopic tests: afaicr nopic is
) > ) > meani
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:49:29PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:
> I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
I do believe that exports symbols from a shared lib. He has static libs.
whole_archive_flag_spec is the variable in libtool to look at, but
that's about all I know about it.
>
>
I think this is what the -export-dynamic flag is for.
Carlo Wood wrote:
I have a normal application (not a shared library thus) which
uses convenience libraries in subdirectories.
This application also uses libltdl - in order to load modules.
These modules needs to resolve symbols from the applicat
On 2004-08-12T09:00+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > On 2004-08-11T10:06+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) > ) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > ) > > libtool-1.4.2-multilib.patch
) > ) > This patch is needed for multilib support. It has been sent upstream
) > ) > but basically reject
I have a normal application (not a shared library thus) which
uses convenience libraries in subdirectories.
This application also uses libltdl - in order to load modules.
These modules needs to resolve symbols from the application,
symbols that are in fact in the convenience libraries.
The applic
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2004-08-11T10:06+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > > libtool-1.4.2-multilib.patch
) > This patch is needed for multilib support. It has been sent upstream
) > but basically rejected in its current form as being too Red Hat specific.
) > [Is this sti
Daniel Reed wrote:
On 2004-08-12T00:30+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) > ) > > libtool-1.4-nonneg.patch
) > ) ) > > libtool-1.5-libtool.m4-x86_64.patch
) > ) This too.
) Aw, with changelog entries and stuff :)
The entry for libtool-1.4-nonneg.patch in the RPM changelog is:
* Thu Jul 13 2000 E
We're pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.1.
This is a tiny bug-fix release motivated by (1) the Debian GNU/Linux
freeze, and (2) a three-week vacation starting in a couple of days :)
The list of bug fixes is appended; we have not yet heard about
regressions introduced by 1.9.
You can
On 2004-08-12T00:30+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) > ) > > libtool-1.4-nonneg.patch
) > ) ) > > libtool-1.5-libtool.m4-x86_64.patch
) > ) This too.
) Aw, with changelog entries and stuff :)
The entry for libtool-1.4-nonneg.patch in the RPM changelog is:
* Thu Jul 13 2000 Elliot Lee <[EMAIL
On 2004-08-11T10:06+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
) Daniel Reed wrote:
) > > libtool-1.4.2-multilib.patch
) > This patch is needed for multilib support. It has been sent upstream
) > but basically rejected in its current form as being too Red Hat specific.
) > [Is this still the case? Is the
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 02:27:00AM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >It has been reported a number of times, and I believe I expressed on the
> >list that this was the single most significant bug related to libtool 1.5.
>
> This should fix it. Please confirm.
As I understo
Hello,
Ra[t]es dropped last week ... Jump on it!
Need more of these? JustR-efin-ance your house/prop and you can get it
Use this for the site: http://holdtiff.com/prime/dWorld/
You must visit the link in 24 hrs to confirm your eligibility.
Sincerely,
Shawn Davis
Account Manager
Hollan
17 matches
Mail list logo
