On 2004-08-12T09:00+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) > On 2004-08-11T10:06+0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote: ) > ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) > ) > > libtool-1.4.2-multilib.patch ) > ) > This patch is needed for multilib support. It has been sent upstream ) > ) > but basically rejected in its current form as being too Red Hat specific. ) > ) > [Is this still the case? Is there an alternate solution for this problem, or ) > ) > is .multilib still the only one?] ) Thanks for the url. I have to agree with Scott, looks like adding this patch ) here would be a bad thing, it may break other linux distros. Someone, ) someday, will come up with a generic way of doing this that works on all ) flavours of GNU/linux. They don't seem to have done so yet.
Would it be reasonable to make this a ./configure option at libtool build time? Something like --enable-redhat-multilib or --with-multilib-flavor=RedHat ? Or even something like --with-multilibformat='lib64' versus --with-multilibformat='$host_os/lib' ? -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.redhat.com/djr/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ "True nobility lies not in being superior to another man, but in being superior to one's previous self." _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
