Hi Harri,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 22:02 +0300, Harri Pitkänen wrote:
> My ultimate goal is to reach a point where we could drop all browser specific
> or legacy HTML formats and just have one HTML export format that works in all
> browsers (or at least in those that 99 % of people use). Or if it t
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> For which I always recommend xmlpp,
> http://software.decisionsoft.com/tools.html
Is this better in some aspect than xmllint --format, which cames with
libxml and requires no manual installation? :)
Thanks.
pgpXWgmUojIPS.pgp
Descri
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack píše v Ne 07. 08. 2011 v 14:32 +0200:
> Very good questions ... it would be cool if some of us (QA, dev, UX)
> could chat about that (Hackfest in Munich, anyone?). At the end, Easy
> Hacks is only one way how an issue / wish is turned in something a new
> developer m
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:25 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:28:42PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > For which I always recommend xmlpp,
> > http://software.decisionsoft.com/tools.html
Many thanks Eike for that tool: I think I'll replace xmllint --format by
this ;)
> Is this
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Aquilina píše v St 10. 08. 2011 v 11:39 +0200:
> Kendy shouldnt opengrok still be indexing the old build system for those
> building 3.4.x ?
[Stripped the unnecessary context that you've let in the mail...]
No need to, all the 3.4 fixes have to be backports from master no
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> [Postgresql connector]
>
> And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
> wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
> Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-related code to LGPLv3 that
> would apply _also_ to this code?
>
H
some...@boldandbusted.com wrote:
> I see the excellent Tinderbox work is going strong. If my report isn't
> really useful anymore due to work elsewhere, please let me know. Time
> moves on, and perhaps this kind of thing is no longer useful or wanted.
>
Hi Jesse - nah, quite the opposite, your cont
On 10/08/11 17:54, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc; though in this case the
bug seems to be a fairly generic include order problem.
The build dies in cosv with:
Compiling: cosv/source/strings/string.cxx
In file included from ../../inc/cosv/string.hxx:33:0,
On 10/08/11 18:14, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc.
It dies in o3tl with:
In file included from
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/o3tl/qa/test-vector_pool.cxx:8:0:
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/solver/350/unxlngx6.pro/inc/o3tl/vector_pool.hxx
Caolan McNamara wrote:
> We don't use these AFAIK.
>
Wow, one month to get to this mail - anyway, if anyone has hints on
how to keep especially the pdf backend working, that would be
appreciated. Could be a nice start of adding a feature to have
librsvg render natively to pdf ...
Cheers,
-- Thors
On 11/08/11 09:36, Noel Power wrote:
[...]
pushed to master
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=1a35f23a2ccb17c3e8e0cb218bb1cf886b4c7124
modified subject to PUSHED
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http:
On 10/08/11 18:49, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc.
It dies in sax with:
In file included from
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/sax/source/tools/fastserializer.cxx:33:0:
/home/tromey/Space/LibreOffice/bootstrap/solver/350/unxlngx6.pro/inc/comphelper/se
On 11/08/11 02:59, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
[...]
2/ I am not well equipped to apply in-lined patch like that (I use
gmail as main mailbox for this dev-list... so it is cut-and-paste with
horror stories about line wrapping and all)
could you use git format-patch to generate patches and attach them
Seeing this is pushed.
Olivier Hallot wrote:
> License is LGPLV3 + MPL
>
Hi Olivier, can you please confirm your patch is "LGPLv3+ / MPL"
(to avoid any ambiguities)?
Thanks,
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpvTID2joUA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Libre
I guess Bjoern knows most about this, adding him to cc list, think he is
on vacation now but surely will look when he gets back
Noel
On 10/08/11 22:56, Henrik Jensen wrote:
Patches licensed under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1 ( or what ever Bjoern Michaelsen prefers
:-) )
A series of 7 suggested patches t
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Wednesday, 2011-08-10 17:48:14 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>> For performance reasons, it (like all the other xcu files, too) got
>> folded into a single large main.xcd. (Beware, very long lines. You
>> may want to pipe it through an XML pr
Jambunathan K wrote:
> I am running in to an issue while converting from odt to Microsoft Word
> 97 format. The problem is that some sections of the odt file are
> differently formatted in word document.
>
Please file a bug, with your sample files attached, here:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org - use
Hello Aaron
Aaron Rasmussen writes:
> When I run the program, everything builds and runs without any error messages,
the LO application starts
> up, but no spreadsheet is ever created. I get the launch screen if I click on
the LO icon in the dock.
>
> I'm wondering if there aren't some compatibi
On 10/08/11 18:44, Jenei Gábor wrote:
Hello Noel,
Well, I just like more if{ } form even is
code is just one line long, but you are right
there are no rules about this, but it is the convention to at least
follow the pattern already used in the source file otherwise things look
very ugly. So
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:22 PM, julien2412 wrote:
> cppcheck has detected 1 Throwing exception in destructor" line 88 of
> core/bridges/test/java_uno/acquire/testacquire.cxx
> (sorry I mentionned 2 locations on IRC cause I forgot about the new git repo
> : it was in core and old ure repo)
> Could it
On Wednesday 10 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >> Technically, lostd::list is no longer a container, as it violates the
> >> requirement that the return type of size() is size_typ
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 21:30 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 01:56 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > For this one at least, the assert itself was bogus for the empty
> > paragraph case, fixed with
> >
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=ba6440349db1bd688c08369d
> Josh, thanks for the patch and the screenshot - the latter makes
> evaluating things for "less developers" (tm) like myself very quick and
> easy.
No problem
> Hence, my question whether a "semi-automatic" extraction of short
> versions of the file type...
I like this idea quite a bit
> Mmh, al
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Noack schrieb:
Hi Josh, Regina, Astron!
[..]
Another thing I've thought about is "keep", "use anyway", ... Only the
visual marker on the button reveals the default choice in the dialog
(grrr, different to LibreOffice ODF default - didn't notice that) - so
my take is to
Hi All,
> I think, that does not solve the "keep" problem. The document, the user is
> working on, _is_ in ODF Format. So saying "Switch to ODK Format" makes no
> sense to him. The user relates (or might relate) the button caption not to
> the target file format but to the source file format. So t
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, wrote:
>
> After a long hiatus, this service is back on the air. I swapped out the
> bad RAM for some good RAM, and hooray, we've got a fresh cppcheck report
> at http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ .
gives a 403 forbidden error right now
ciao
Christian
__
[ Premise: If you think adding something to LO code is easy, you are still an
inexperienced LO developer. ]
#include
...
printf( "%d\n", Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
printf( "%d\n", ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
25
10
As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least
BANNED CONTENTS ALERT
Our content checker found
banned name: .exe,.exe-ms,.txt ... .exe
in email presumably from you
to the following recipient:
-> jbelt...@iqfarma.com
Our internal reference code for your message is 22512-11/BHV4qPSr8+9R
First upstream SMTP client IP address: [200.121.169
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how much would
> break if I fixed these two to be sane?
I don't know, but I would guess that it is used for delta times as well
as "wall clock" times. That would certainly explai
Hi all,
I fixed fdo#37403 a while ago, and Rainer asked if we could cherry-pick
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=21ec661d09ed9d7bbbec5e52ee2b382d8c465324
to 3.4.2.
Can someone review, sign-off and cherry-pick it?
Thanks,
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http:/
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 15:36 +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I fixed fdo#37403 a while ago, and Rainer asked if we could cherry-pick
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs-core/commit/?id=21ec661d09ed9d7bbbec5e52ee2b382d8c465324
> to 3.4.2.
Forgot all about that one. Don't yo
Hi,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 10:15:02 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
> > wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
> > Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-related code to LGPLv3 that
> > would apply
Hello Thosrten
I do confirm.
Kind regards
Olivier
2011/8/11 Thorsten Behrens
> Seeing this is pushed.
>
> Olivier Hallot wrote:
> > License is LGPLV3 + MPL
> >
> Hi Olivier, can you please confirm your patch is "LGPLv3+ / MPL"
> (to avoid any ambiguities)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Thor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 33463, which changed state.
Bug 33463 Summary: Comments are lost after FILESAVE as DOCX
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33463
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Hello Kohei, Eike, Caolán
Thank you guys for the coding advise and commit.
I take note on the added value in optimizing code to squeeze CPU cycles. So
far I was coding caring on legibility and understandability.
Kind regards
Olivier
2011/8/11 Kohei Yoshida
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 22:07 -0400
Meta-reply: I am far from contributing a patch, so my
thoughts are off-topic for this list. I am happy to take
this conversation to private email or to the discussion list
if that would better suit the list recipients.
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:43 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> [ Premise: If you th
Lubos Lunak wrote:
> As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for time
> having 25 hours, but 10 seconds without 20 seconds being 10 seconds (and
> there is actually explicit code to ensure that)?
>
> Does somebody know why the Time class does either of these and how
> "Norbert" == Norbert Thiebaud writes:
Norbert> 1/ Are we sure that this behavior will be seen in a _released_ gcc ?
Norbert> (not a rhetorical question, I'm a bit weary of chasing gcc trunk that
Norbert> closely)
I believe so; or at least, this is definitely a bug in LibreOffice.
'checkSiz
Noel> I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel>
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled in 'ure' (actually everywhere using ./g pull) but I don't
see that commit. I'm on '
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:09:39AM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Noel> I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
> Noel>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
>
> I don't understand where these commits go.
> I re-pulled in 'ure' (a
Hello Tom,
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 09:09 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Noel> I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
> Noel>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
>
> I don't understand where these commits go.
> I re-pulled in 'ure
Miklos> Yes, core.git. See
Miklos>
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build#Getting_the_sources
Miklos> Background:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/One_Git_Conversion
Thanks. I must have read some stale document before starting; but
unfortunately I don't recall
On 11/08/11 16:09, Tom Tromey wrote:
Noel> I rolled up this patch and the previous one here
Noel>
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c2a634416ba8f385c25c16cc52aeae6f68cab9db
I don't understand where these commits go.
I re-pulled in 'ure' (actually everywhere using ./g pul
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 12:29 +0930, Josh Heidenreich wrote:
> I have attached a patch also.
Looks a good start to me, overly-wide alright for some of the filter
names, but when it appears it's obvious without reading war and peace
which button I want, which makes it better I reckon.
Pushed as a wo
Hi Lubos,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 14:43:28 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> #include
> ...
> printf( "%d\n", Time( 25, 0, 0 ).GetHour());
> printf( "%d\n", ( Time( 1, 0, 10 ) - Time( 1, 0, 20 )).GetSec());
>
> 25
> 10
>
> As much as I don't like it, I can possibly see at least some reason for time
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > [Postgresql connector]
> >
> > And the libreoffice pre-commit hooks complain about that. I was
> > wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation by Sun /
> > Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOff
Le 11/08/11 16:05, Eike Rathke a écrit :
Hi Eike,
> The current state of affairs from what I know is that the list of files
> prepared contains all files of OOO340 plus all new files in all of the
> pending CWSs. Whether all of the files really will end up at AOOo is yet
> to be seen. But I'm fai
Hi Olivier,
On Thursday, 2011-08-11 11:26:28 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> I take note on the added value in optimizing code to squeeze CPU cycles. So
> far I was coding caring on legibility and understandability.
Bear in mind that usually micro-optimizing code isn't worth the time as
modern op
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:14 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 11/08/11 16:05, Eike Rathke a écrit :
>
> Hi Eike,
>
> > The current state of affairs from what I know is that the list of files
> > prepared contains all files of OOO340 plus all new files in all of the
> > pending CWSs. Whether a
Hi,
The attached patch allowed me to build and dev-install (wikihelp opens
properly) master without cloning the help repo (saving 20MB of download
of something I don't need during development in most cases).
The Android/iOS part is because Tor already introduced a "DESKTOP" build
type where helpc
Le 11/08/11 18:29, drew a écrit :
Hi Drew,
>
> I'm not sure it ever was - you get the binary from the main OO.o webstie
> and not the extensions site (that never changed did it?)
Yep, and it was only available for certain OSes (not Mac, which is my
main platform).
> the only source I knew off
Hi.
I have just found another (pretty big, I think) usability problem with
the dialogue: it doesn't have a Cancel button that would abort the
save. Pressing Esc currently selects the "Save in ODF Format" button.
To "keep the user in control" (quote from Gnome HIG again) Josh,
would you mind think
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:22 PM, julien2412 wrote:
> ...
>> Could it be replaced by just a log (which function should be used for
>> this
>> kind of case ?) or something since a throw in destructor should be
>> avoided ?
> Given that assertNotNull() further down in that f
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 06:42:52PM +0200, Miklos Vajna
wrote:
> The attached patch allowed me to build and dev-install (wikihelp opens
> properly) master without cloning the help repo (saving 20MB of download
> of something I don't need during development in most cases).
>
> The Android/iOS part
I had an unexpectedly hard time moving oox into tail_build... I
tinkered with it fours hours, build after build to get it to 'work'...
but in the end I'm getting tunnel visioned.
I'm not sure if all the change I made were necessary or even if they
were the correct way... one thing I know is I disl
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 01:11:43PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 11:32 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Ah, I found:
>> solenv/bin/linkoo:export SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS=1
>> sc/source/ui/vba/testvba/runTests.pl: $ENV{"SAL_ALLOW_LINKOO_SYMLINKS"} =
>> "1";
>> toolkit/w
Hi all,
There has been a heap of discussion about this in another thread, and
I posted a patch there, but I though I should post a [PATCH] one too.
This is version 3 of the patch. LGPLv3/MIT.
Josh
From 8cea17536d1be944db3e74711e2e0d92594a2d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Heidenreich
Date
Hi All,
I have the third version of the patch.
See also this screen:
http://thejosh.info/libreoffice/export_format_v3.png
Is it possible to get this into master?
Commit message:
Alien save dialog to include format name on save button
Licenced under LGPLv3/MPL
I'm going to do another one after
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:55:02AM -0400, drew wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 10:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> [Postgresql connector]
>>> I was wondering if by any chance there is a general authorisation
>>> by Sun / Oracle that relicenses *all* OpenOffice-rel
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> ...
> You mean I can just run "build" in a module and
> ./install/program/soffice will use it, without rerunning "make
> dev-install"? Ah yes, it works, you just increased my productivity!
> ...
>
Hello,
Unless it has changed or I forget/misunderstand something but
> I have the third version of the patch.
Oops, forgot to attach
From 8cea17536d1be944db3e74711e2e0d92594a2d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Heidenreich
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:25:48 +0930
Subject: [PATCH] Changes to the "alien" save dialog
This is part one.
Part two will contain additiona
Hi there,
On 12 August 2011 06:20, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> I had an unexpectedly hard time moving oox into tail_build... I
> tinkered with it fours hours, build after build to get it to 'work'...
> but in the end I'm getting tunnel visioned.
>
Hmm, indeed, there are many things to do it seems.
On 08/11/11 05:38, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:38 PM, wrote:
>>
>> After a long hiatus, this service is back on the air. I swapped out the
>> bad RAM for some good RAM, and hooray, we've got a fresh cppcheck report
>> at http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.com/ .
>
> gives
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On 12 August 2011 06:20, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>> I had an unexpectedly hard time moving oox into tail_build... I
>> tinkered with it fours hours, build after build to get it to 'work'...
>> but in the end I'm getting tunnel vi
64 matches
Mail list logo
