On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:29:24AM +0100, Wols Lists
wrote:
> If Word's autocorrect kicks in, that's considered a separate action from
> what the user did, so if I mis-type then Word autocorrupts, the first
> ctrl-z reverses the autocorrupt, and I need a second ctrl-z to undo what
> I did.
No ne
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 17:13 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida
> > Just so you know, piggybacking on a thread and say "please fix my
> > favorite bug I filed x years ago" is not appreciated.
>
> Sorry if I offended you.
No offense was taken; I just did not
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida
wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>> >
>> > That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
>> > too long ago to remember the details, and it w
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
> >
> > That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
> > too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
> > remember whether it was a Writer tabl
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>
> That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
> too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
> remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the
> cell and tabbed away. The Au
On 27/06/14 17:22, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:42 +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
>> Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for
>> things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a
>> second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's tw
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:42 +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
> Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for
> things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a
> second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's two ,
> not one?
I'll take this idea. I hope
On 06/06/14 12:27, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
>
> Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case
> require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather
> than in two separate steps?
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as t
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:56 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
>
> > Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
>
> > Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use
> case require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step,
> rather than in two separate st
Hi Kohei,
> Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
> Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case
> require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather than in
> two separate steps?
Well, we're talking of a company, I don't use it personally.
O
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 07:50 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> > > Yes. I'm almost certain that some enterprise users actually use this
> > > feature.
>
> > I'd like to know they still exist though, rather than speculating that they
> > still do.
>
> I hate to disappoint you, but t
Hi Kohei,
> > Yes. I'm almost certain that some enterprise users actually use this
> > feature.
> I'd like to know they still exist though, rather than speculating that they
> still do.
I hate to disappoint you, but the company I work with does.
And I would think that LibreOffice would aim to
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 19:54 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida
> wrote:
> > In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> > results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
> > place.
>
> When we've deprecated
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida
wrote:
> In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
> place.
When we've deprecated/removed other features, how did we handle that
that in the Release Not
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 00:23 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Kohei,
>
> On Thursday, 2014-06-05 13:33:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
>
> > In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> > results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
> > place.
> >
>
Hi Kohei,
On Thursday, 2014-06-05 13:33:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
> place.
>
> I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got remove
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 17:20 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 22:52 +0200, Mat M wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
> > a écrit:
> >
> > > In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> > > results to someplace el
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 22:52 +0200, Mat M wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
> a écrit:
>
> > In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
> > results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
> > place.
> >
> > I'm
Hello,
Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
a écrit:
In Calc, you can go to Data -> Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got removed.
The U
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 21:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> > I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got
> > removed.
> >
> Especially with Calc & Writer, it is a relatively safe bet that every
> obscure feature is absolutely necessary for someone's work
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got
> removed.
>
Especially with Calc & Writer, it is a relatively safe bet that every
obscure feature is absolutely necessary for someone's workflow.
Just sayin,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
21 matches
Mail list logo
