On 06/06/14 12:27, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Good. Now I have someone real I can ask. > > Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case > require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather > than in two separate steps?
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's two <ctrl-z>, not one? That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the cell and tabbed away. The AutoCorrupt kicked in. And <ctrl-z> reversed the ENTIRE operation, deleting the text I'd typed! I just *could* *not* work out how to get LO to accept what I'd typed without insisting on corrupting it. So it makes a lot of sense, in many circumstances, for a user's input to be treated as multiple steps requiring multiple undos, even when it's just one user action that triggers it. Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
