When the user selects "Pages" radio button in the Range section, it is very
reasonable to expect that she would now want to specify the range. Thus moving
the focus automatically to the page range edit box would save the user a mouse
click.
Code is contributed under the LGPLv3+ / MPL.
Signed-off
> Calc add-ins do not support functions that take or
> return UNO type hyper.
> .. however, it should work if the .idl file instead
> uses unsigned hyper ...
>
This is why I started this topic.
Moreover, NetBeans Wizard for Calc add-ins shows Java "int" and this is
mapped correctly as "long" in I
Hi,
I have added the feature with screenshot to the ReleaseNotes.
Stephan: I'm compiling the code and will test the patch when it is done.
M.V.G.
Rob Snelders
On vr 21 okt 2011 17:53:31 CEST, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:37 +0200, Rob Snelders wrote:
Here are 3 pat
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Unfortunately, this breaks the build, as basic now has a (missing)
> dependency on sfx2, which already depends on basic.
Fair enough, my mistake. I dropped sfx from the link line, it's not
actually required, leaving the link de
Hi Michael
Em 21-10-2011 17:51, Michael Meeks escreveu:
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 17:15 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
The following patch fixes bug fdo41997.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41997
Wow - no sooner than I filed it, it got closed :-) great work. I push
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 21:02 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> have replaced this implementation with a new, faster one:
Nice work :-)
> but perhaps that just means my new machine is too fast; perhaps somebody
> wants to benchmark it on their netbook/Alpha box/ARM wristwatch
You kno
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 17:15 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> The following patch fixes bug fdo41997.
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41997
Wow - no sooner than I filed it, it got closed :-) great work. I pushed
the patch, it looks like you caught all the cases in
Hi
The following patch fixes bug fdo41997, clean VCL enumeration.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41997
Note: tested only in Linux, not tested in Windows (no windows available
for me)
Regards
--
Olivier Hallot
Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation
LibreOff
On 10/21/2011 03:57 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 14:51 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
That would of course mean shipping some
duplicate legacy MSVC++ compiled libraries, but ... surely do-able.
It would not suffice to ship them, one would also need to build them.
Kind of back
The following patch fixes bug fdo41997.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41997
Note: tested only in Linux, not tested in Windows. No
Regards
--
Olivier Hallot
Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation
LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese
+55-21-
On 21/04/11 18:33, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:24:57 +0100
Michael Meeks
wrote:
If not, it sounds like we should have it always enabled (?),
particularly if we can cleanup the issues it finds :-)
Enabled by default on master with:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libre
Marcin, hope you don't mind I bring this back to the public mailing
list. I'm no expert with Calc add-ins, so we should make sure I'm not
telling nonsense:
On 10/21/2011 05:42 PM, MarcinGutman wrote:
Sorry, not sure what you want to tell me with the above.
If you create Java Calc Add-In yo
Hi all,
I recently upgraded from Ubuntu 11.04 to 11.10 and after pulling from
master this morning, and making clean, the build no longer completes,
failing in the moz module with lots of internal errors of the type :
/home/alex/LODEV/core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/lib/libcrmf.a(asn1cmn.o):(.data.re
Hi Michael
Thanks for your response
I have 3 degrees of responses
>
> So - you can get a tool panel presented and working for you ? [ do you
> get to the green screenshot state ? ].
>
1-
well i went a bit more deeper than the green panel ;)
using the java code at
core/testautomation/ext
Hi August, Michael,
Michael Meeks píše v Pá 21. 10. 2011 v 10:13 +0100:
> Ooh ! :-) this is really nice. I was previously fooled by the subject
> into not noticing that this was some sexy code cleanup + unit testing
> patch.
Michael - thank you a lot for pushing this, and sorry, August, th
On 10/21/2011 11:13 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi August,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:01 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, August Sodora wrote:
I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC
scanner. Most of the test cases are just to get an idea of how
Sure all of my work can be licensed MPL/LGPLv3+.
Just noticed I forgot to refer to the bug that gave me the idea to try
this (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39900)
August Sodora
aug...@gmail.com
(201) 280-8138
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 17:19 +0200, Laurent Godard wrote:
> before diving in calc large file in november, i have to deal at the
> moment with XToolPanel
Sounds exciting :-)
> the purpose is to be able to have things in task pane and manipulate
> them using scripting (macro or
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:37 +0200, Rob Snelders wrote:
> Here are 3 patches that together make the code for adding the
> scan-button to the sanedlg.
Great to see that :-) Any chance you could drop a nice screenshot /
feature note and your name at:
http://wiki.documentfou
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 02:25 +0200, MarcinGutman wrote:
> Could somebody confirm this bug?
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42005
Apparently the resolution is 'Notabug' but thanks for caring about our
quality. There is a QA list: libreoffice...@lists.freedesktop.org - that
is
Hello Michael, August,
2011/10/21 Michael Meeks :
> Hi August,
>
> On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:50 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
>> Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
>> continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
>> they inherit from eachothe
Hi August,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:50 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
> Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
> continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
> they inherit from eachother?!) in basic? I'm also curious about VBA
> support and whe
Hi Michael,
Good catch with this :-)
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:28 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> is there any authoritative documentation on when exactly the SolarMutex
> should be locked when coming from the UI?
So - with the gtk+ backend, it should mirror the GDK_THREADS lock th
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:45 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
> Interesting, I'll take a look at those documents. I had actually
> initially thought that adding something to the BASIC language would be
> more controversial than adding a calc cell function :)
Heh :-) well, the direction we're t
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 14:51 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > That would of course mean shipping some
> > duplicate legacy MSVC++ compiled libraries, but ... surely do-able.
>
> It would not suffice to ship them, one would also need to build them.
> Kind of back to square one.
For wind
Hello,
Please, could somebody check this...
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42005
Best Regards,
Marcin Gutman
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>From my humble experience with OOo , i conclude that the designers decided to
have a limited functionality for toolbars. I would be happy to know of some
people willing to improve OOo toolbars API allowing more power and
flexibility to build complex toolbars with rich controls and dynamic events.
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 11:19 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> My latest patch fixes it, I would like to have it in LibreOffice
> 3.4.4,
Now pushed to 3-4
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/
Hey,
I just enabled the macro's test in calc again and it seems that in
some situations we get a deadlock in the first incremental build after
the patch. If you observe that in your build, do a make clean and the
next make should execute the test without a problem.
If you still get problem after
Thanks this seems very interesting.
So we could include Tool Panels in a toolbar too and not only in a Task Pane
is that correct?
I'll be very interested to see some snippet code (java or python) on how to
make a Tool Panel and add it to a addon toolbar.
I can work on this if you give me some guide
On 10/21/2011 02:38 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 21:58 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
In rsc/doku/feinkonz.43 there are 3 sdw files, LibreOffice 3.4.x
crashes on all of them under Linux/Windows. I did not try master. 3.3
is OK.
master crashes for me alright,
http://cgit.freedes
I want to cherry-pick the attached commit back to 3-4, the .sdw import
of the binfilter is broken otherwise as timar noted.
May need git am --ignore-whitespace or whatever to apply.
C.
>From ac7475b06466404ac23d5352d9226de857d83987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Caol=C3=A1n=20McNamara?=
On 10/21/2011 10:39 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:06 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
From the wiki page, one of the concerns is "binary incompatibility". I
assume this is in reference to extensions?
Sure; of course we only export a reasonably small ABI, th
Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
they inherit from eachother?!) in basic? I'm also curious about VBA
support and whether there exists a grammar or similar documentation
for the StarBASIC langu
On 10/21/2011 11:08 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 4:11am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/21/2011 02:06 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
5. That API definition will be a *lot* of work, but hopefully somewhat
thought out already through only a mild reengineering of the current
binary AP
Interesting, I'll take a look at those documents. I had actually
initially thought that adding something to the BASIC language would be
more controversial than adding a calc cell function :) Has there been
any discussion on where these types of additions should go in the
past?
August Sodora
aug...
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 21:58 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> In rsc/doku/feinkonz.43 there are 3 sdw files, LibreOffice 3.4.x
> crashes on all of them under Linux/Windows. I did not try master. 3.3
> is OK.
master crashes for me alright,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/binfilter/commit/?id=86d
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(c) pyuno as run from an external python process might no longer work. An
easy way to test that is to start the interactive python executable from the
LibO program directory and execute "include uno" (and/or "include pyuno"; not
sure right now which
HI
,
> I looked to this one but these are not flexible enough. i need more complex
> controls (like XFixedText and progressbar). i also want to dynamically
> show/hide toolbar controls at runtime. do you know how we can do this?
i'm currently exploring this
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wik
Hi,
I looked to this one but these are not flexible enough. i need more complex
controls (like XFixedText and progressbar). i also want to dynamically
show/hide toolbar controls at runtime. do you know how we can do this?
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.
Michael Stahl wrote:
> would anybody object to turning it off?
>
Nope, go for it. It has bitten a few others before already...
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpU0N867kgyH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop
hi all,
noticed that i just committed thb's patch with a Gmane mangled mail
address :(
is there a particular reason why this list is using the address mangling?
looks like the addresses aren't that well protected in the fd.o web
interface anyway e.g. 'mstahl at redhat.com'.
and also the ot
Hi August,
August Sodora schrieb:
I came across this feature request today and decided to try my hand at
it. Is the attached patch an appropriate solution?
I understand now, that you will do BASIC and CALC at the same time.
For CALC there are some problems. A function FRAC is not defined in
On 21/10/11 11:59, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi there,
it seems, though the filter is there, we don't read .svg files from
the Pictures stream inside the odf zip container. Easy fix attached,
could someone please review& commit to -3-4?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
have reviewed and pushed to -3-4.
r
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:28 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> now which frame in that stack should lock the SolarMutex ?
Possibly a special case because the file dialog here is the gtk file
dialog and its more a miracle it works than something to prod too
hard :-) ?
C.
__
On 21/10/11 04:19, August Sodora wrote:
I came across this feature request today and decided to try my hand at
it. Is the attached patch an appropriate solution?
seems like a nice patch :-). From the basic side of things , all seems
fine, if Kohei is happy with the calc parts then I see no prob
is there any authoritative documentation on when exactly the SolarMutex
should be locked when coming from the UI?
i know that it must be locked on UNO API method entry in the parts of
the code that are not otherwise threadsafe, but i have no idea how the
UI stuff / VCL works.
for example, so
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:31:23PM -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> I get stuck with autogen.sh, asking for "Qt4 Libraries" when I
> --enable-kde4.
> I am on a Kubuntu Oneiric machine and it seems I cannot find the
> right package to install. Must be stupid, but I just don't get it.
apt-get build-de
Hi all,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:16:07AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Try running a no-op incremental make in tail_build :-) it's more like
> 30+ seconds:
Only with gb_CHECKOBJECTOWNER=T otherwise its down to 10 seconds in tail_build,
which is likely mostly stat'ing.
Anyway: I implemen
Hi there,
it seems, though the filter is there, we don't read .svg files from
the Pictures stream inside the odf zip container. Easy fix attached,
could someone please review & commit to -3-4?
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
From abc156890a8cb64094f5d668274559203ae188b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thorst
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 09:25 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> What would be -really- excellent to nail this permanently would be to
> have a during-compile unit test that exercises pyuno, clearly getting
> that working on Linux first would be ideal.
> Which reminds me - do we not have bridge-tes
Hi August,
August Sodora schrieb:
I came across this feature request today and decided to try my hand at
it. Is the attached patch an appropriate solution?
I'm not sure about it. It seems you are mixing up BASIC functions and
CALC interpreter.
Kind regards
Regina
___
On 19/10/11 10:17, Dag Wieers wrote:
Hi,
During the course of the LibreOffice conference in Paris, we (the
unoconv and cloudooo projects) found that some of the issues our users
were having while doing document conversions using PyUNO and OpenOffice
and LibreOffice were not related to our own pr
At 5:16am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:20 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
That said, I anecdotally note on my limited-in-hardware machine,
that a consecutive run of make is almost instantaneous. Would a
make -pn really be that expensive?
Try running a no-op
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 14:20 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> That said, I anecdotally note on my limited-in-hardware machine, that a
> consecutive run of make is almost instantaneous. Would a make -pn
> really be that expensive?
Try running a no-op incremental make in tail_build :-) it's m
Hi August,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:01 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, August Sodora wrote:
> > I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC
> > scanner. Most of the test cases are just to get an idea of how the
> > scanner handles certain situat
At 4:11am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/21/2011 02:06 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
5. That API definition will be a *lot* of work, but hopefully somewhat
thought out already through only a mild reengineering of the current
binary API.
The UNO API is already there. Or what do
At 4:39am -0400 Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
[one /could/ work toward interprocess extensions ... ] But of course,
I personally think there is much lower hanging fruit in the calc core
;-)
Noted and agreed! I'm just sticking my nose in all things LO, probably
stepping on toes as I d
Hi Jonathan
Em 21-10-2011 03:46, Jonathan Aquilina escreveu:
On 20/10/2011 22:31, Olivier Hallot wrote:
I am taking a stab in the dark here, but have you tried installing the
qt4-dev-tools package?
Yes, it is installed.
Peeking at configure.in, it seems that the test for Qt4 Libraries is
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 20:06 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> From the wiki page, one of the concerns is "binary incompatibility". I
> assume this is in reference to extensions?
Sure; of course we only export a reasonably small ABI, the 'ure' (big
chunks of which are in-lined C++
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:21 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> I must confess ...
Heh :-) seems reasonable enough.
> Anyway, if anybody less Windows-phobic than me would like to check out
> whether pyuno still works on Windows, that would be great:
In the past I've had similar pr
On 10/21/2011 01:20 AM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:21:52PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
(c) pyuno as run from an external python process might no longer work.
An easy way to test that is to start the interactive python executable
from the LibO program directory and execut
On 10/21/2011 02:06 AM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
At 4:52pm -0400 Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/LibreOffice4
+ getting stuck into Windows / mingw build etc.
From the wiki page, one of the concerns is "binary incompatibility". I
assume this
Hi
>
> why? is it impossible to configure a custom toolbar in addon using
> controller.xcu ? and how to get it work in my addon?
> does OOO provides an API to give advanced custom toolbar configuration in
> a addon.
>
> can someone help on this please?
you may have a look at the sdk, there ar
Interestingly enough there seem to be two definitions for the frac
function. Your implementation is the one seemingly used by all
programming languages, which implement it. But the correct
mathematical definition seems to be y = x - floor(x)
(http://mathworld.wolfram.com/FractionalPart.html), which
65 matches
Mail list logo
