Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Replace-SvULongs-with-std-vector-in-sfx2

2011-09-28 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:11:11PM +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote: > Hi *, > > Simple Patch replacing SvULongs with std::vector. Related Bug 38831. Pushed, thanks! > @@ -53,7 +54,7 @@ TYPEINIT1_FACTORY( SvxClipboardFmtItem, SfxPoolItem , new > SvxClipboardFmtItem(0 > SvxClipboardFmtItem_Impl

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

2011-09-28 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi, this patch is only to fix the wrong namespace. To get a better accessibility is a different problem and has to be addressed separate. Kind regards Regina Christophe Strobbe schrieb: Hi, At 16:14 28-9-2011, Christophe Strobbe wrote: Hi Regina, At 15:50 28-9-2011, Regina Henschel wrote:

Re: [Libreoffice] unit tests run on top-level make ?

2011-09-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:15:30 -0500 Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Michael Meeks > wrote: > > > >        Having done a from-clean make (successfully), I was slightly > > surprised to discover that this had failed to compile the unit > > tests: > > > the target 'all' wa

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Get rid of SvULongs in calc

2011-09-28 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:06:49AM +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > 4) Last but not least, please state that you are submitting your patches > > under LGPLv3+/MPL 1.1. > > Of course and future also. Hi, could you add yourself to http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Devel

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH][PUSHED] Re: Replace SvULongs and SvUShorts in svx with std::vector

2011-09-28 Thread David Tardon
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:09:02PM +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote: > Marking as PATCH. Might got lost. Thanks, pushed. D. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] [Patch][PUSHED] Porting js2hxx.py to python3

2011-09-28 Thread David Tardon
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen wrote: > Hi, > > This is a simple patch to allow using python 3 when building. > I'm new to this list, and to submitting patches for libreoffice, so if > I did anything wrong, feel free to correct me :) Thanks, you did all right :) Ca

[Libreoffice] need help with feature/gbuild

2011-09-28 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi, I have recreated feature/gbuild branch. I'm gbuildizing sal, salhelper, cppu and cppuhelper there. It's almost done but there are few problems. In odk I'm getting: check cpp docu: + ERROR: "../../unxlngi6.pro/bin/odkcommon/docs/c

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Stahl
On 28.09.2011 10:42, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 00:46 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 27.09.2011 10:33, Michael Meeks wrote: >>> Sure sure, so - I think Stephan has a point - that we ought to find >>> some way of enabling this for some set of people that can cope with it.

Re: [Libreoffice] unit tests run on top-level make ?

2011-09-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > >        Having done a from-clean make (successfully), I was slightly surprised > to discover that this had failed to compile the unit tests: > That was a problem in the top-level Makefile. the target 'all' was not the first target anymore

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 --- Comment #208 from LE GARREC Vincent 2011-09-28 14:04:33 PDT --- 40854 : because, it's really annoying that sometimes you cannot select two drawings with the mouse and CTRL key. With the bug report is attached a document that show the problem

[Libreoffice] New Config Variable in Impress

2011-09-28 Thread Rob Snelders
Hi, I'm looking into bug fdo#35973. But I have trouble finding out how I can add config-variables for Impress. Can anybody give me any pointers? -- Greetings, Rob Snelders ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.fr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 LE GARREC Vincent changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||40854 -- Configure bugmail: https:/

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Thorsten, did you follow that example and set SYSBASE, or did you get > your Android cross-build to complete without using SYSBASE? > I did set SYSBASE, following your example. Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpFm569o9dcg.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: [Libreoffice] bug in GCC 4.6.1?

2011-09-28 Thread julien2412
Hello Kevin, I just found this gcc bugtracker : http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 But it's about GCC 4.7. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/bug-in-GCC-4-6-1-tp3376935p3377222.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Libreoffice] comprehensive binfilter tests?

2011-09-28 Thread Andras Timar
2011/9/26 Caolán McNamara : > On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 10:23 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> With the apparently somewhat semi-automatic code clean-up/removal in >> binfilter (removing dead code, noticing compiler warnings about thus >> newly unused variables, thus removing more dead code, ...), I w

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> actually git grep SYSBASE= still return nothing useful. I don't know if setting it in the environment when running configure is the intended use case (who knows?), but I notice that in my Android cross-build tree's autogen.lastrun, I set SYSBASE=/home/tml/android-ndk-r6/platforms/android-9/arch-

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> I don't think we use SYSBASE anywhere anymore > > Huh, we use in a lot of places. > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=&project=core&defs=&refs=SYSBASE&path=&hist= humm, I must have botched my git grep... sorry about the noise. I'm a

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> I don't think we use SYSBASE anywhere anymore Huh, we use in a lot of places. http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=&project=core&defs=&refs=SYSBASE&path=&hist= > I don't think it is a good idea -- and it is inconsistent with what we > do now -- to overwrite CC/CXX if it has been defined by

[Libreoffice] bug in GCC 4.6.1?

2011-09-28 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hullo List, I recall mention on the list that the LO build was finding bugs in various build programs, but I was only paying peripheral attention. Now I've run across something from GCC 4.6.1 that says: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148 Please

[Libreoffice] unit tests run on top-level make ?

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Having done a from-clean make (successfully), I was slightly surprised to discover that this had failed to compile the unit tests: In file included from /data/opt/libreoffice/core/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx:30:0: /data/opt/libreoffice/core/solver/unxlngi6.pro/inc/test/bootstrapfixture.hxx:43:31

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 32709, which changed state. Bug 32709 Summary: PPT/PPTX created by LibreOffice can't be opened by MS PowerPoint Viewer and MS Office Web Apps https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32709 What|Old Va

Re: [Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Hi *, > > > If I get to it, I'll have a tinderbox building it - and to make > people playing with it a tad easier, what about attached patch to > configure.in (similar in spirit to the --with-macosx-sdk option), > that adds a --with-andro

[Libreoffice] Android cross-building state

2011-09-28 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, thanks to Tor's and others (Kendy, Fridrich, Jesus and all those I forgot) work around making LibO truly cross-buildable, there's now Android building up to instsetoo_native again. It's not doing anything sensible besides compiling yet. If I get to it, I'll have a tinderbox building it - an

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

2011-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 40392, which changed state. Bug 40392 Summary: Application launches in background, does not receive foreground focus https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40392 What|Old Value |Ne

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Porting js2hxx.py to python3

2011-09-28 Thread Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen
Hi, This is a simple patch to allow using python 3 when building. I'm new to this list, and to submitting patches for libreoffice, so if I did anything wrong, feel free to correct me :) Regards, -- Hugo Beauzée-Luyssen From ecc20336a6a5a0e428551805071cccf9e9d17158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

2011-09-28 Thread Christophe Strobbe
Hi, At 16:14 28-9-2011, Christophe Strobbe wrote: Hi Regina, At 15:50 28-9-2011, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, The patch fixes the following error: When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace. How to pr

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

2011-09-28 Thread Christophe Strobbe
Hi Regina, At 15:50 28-9-2011, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi all, The patch fixes the following error: When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace. How to proof it: Export any file and make sure, that the file

Re: [Libreoffice] Option convert-to

2011-09-28 Thread Arianne Valdes Alvarez
Hi Cor, thanks by anwser me quickly - Mensaje original - De: "Cor Nouws" Para: "Arianne Valdes Alvarez" CC: "libreoffice" Enviados: Miércoles, 28 de Septiembre 2011 0:45:45 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected Asunto: Re: [Libreoffice] Option convert-to This list is for developer issues. See

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] fdo#40373 - export xhtml parse error

2011-09-28 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi all, The patch fixes the following error: When you export a document via File->Export->XHTML it generates an invalid file, because the lang attribute gets a wrong namespace. How to proof it: Export any file and make sure, that the file extension is xhtml. Upload the file to http://validato

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

2011-09-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 34184, which changed state. Bug 34184 Summary: [Task]: Make E-mail MAILMERGE usable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34184 What|Old Value |New Value --

Re: [Libreoffice] sfx2 et al wanting libxml2.a pointlessly

2011-09-28 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> It looks like that is explicitly requested (in a rather hacky and wrong > way) at RepositoryFixes.mk:139 ff. -[line 128 here] - but that looks wrong > anyway, > doesnt it? Ah, yes, I did that, now I recall, and the comment says it all, it is/was rather ad-hoc. If these 3rd-party libs now do get

Re: [Libreoffice] Easy Hack String replacement: SearchAndReplace

2011-09-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:55 -0300, Neil Leathers wrote: > This seems to work fine. I guess > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/String_Classes should > be updated? Probably, feel free to edit it with the extra info. I didn't check to see if its a universal replacement for the String::*

Re: [Libreoffice] sfx2 et al wanting libxml2.a pointlessly

2011-09-28 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:24:30 +0200 Thorsten Behrens wrote: > so I'm hit by the android crossbuild not generating static libs for > several external libs - but gbuild kind of requiring them for no > good reason. It looks like that is explicitly requested (in a rather hacky and wrong way) at Repos

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 11:44 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Yes, test was intended for such stuff -- but we need to make sure not to > introduce circular dependencies. (The conceptual level of that module > is still somewhat undecided.) "fattest"/"uglytest", "slimtest"/"goodtest" if it arises

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hello Stephan, 2011/9/28 Stephan Bergmann > On 09/28/2011 10:46 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: > >>Incidentally, while trying to get some StarBasic / VBA unit tests >> working with Moggi, it seemed that some of our hangs were down to >> dialogs showing up that were simply not visible, and spin

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/28/2011 10:46 AM, Michael Meeks wrote: Incidentally, while trying to get some StarBasic / VBA unit tests working with Moggi, it seemed that some of our hangs were down to dialogs showing up that were simply not visible, and spinning the mainloop waiting for a response. static void

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/28/2011 11:27 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:46 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: Reading the various cppunit tests we have and the code cut/paste going on gives some concern. We need a place to share most of this "really bootstrap UNO" heavy lifting and the various other bi

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:46 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Reading the various cppunit tests we have and the code cut/paste going > on gives some concern. We need a place to share most of this "really > bootstrap UNO" heavy lifting and the various other bits of common > magic that go on there, presu

[Libreoffice] unit-test / code sharing ...

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 19:01 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > Don't get me wrong... I'd love to run make check on these boxes... but > not if that means that I have to watch them like milk on fire (1)... Incidentally, while trying to get some StarBasic / VBA unit tests working wit

Re: [Libreoffice] --enable-werror

2011-09-28 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 00:46 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 27.09.2011 10:33, Michael Meeks wrote: > > Sure sure, so - I think Stephan has a point - that we ought to find > > some way of enabling this for some set of people that can cope with it. > > I suspect a good heuristic would be to have

Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttest hang ...

2011-09-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 09/28/2011 02:01 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: (1) it occurred to me that this French expression may not translate well. "a surveiller comme du lait sur le feux" means to keep close and attentive watch... milk being notorious -- when it start boiling -- for quickly overflowing the pot. That m