On 28.09.2011 10:42, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 00:46 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: >> On 27.09.2011 10:33, Michael Meeks wrote: >>> Sure sure, so - I think Stephan has a point - that we ought to find >>> some way of enabling this for some set of people that can cope with it. >>> I suspect a good heuristic would be to have an 'auto' mode for the flag >>> that checks if you have git push access and if so enables -Werror, so >>> that old-hands get it automatically, and newbies don't suffer. >> >> perhaps it can be enabled automatically for "known good" GCC versions > > A given gcc 4.X.Y in a distro may have additional patches applied to it, > e.g. visibility support backports or so on, which makes making a > decision based on the simple version number problematic.
good point. > I think we're overthinking it really. tinderboxes can (and do, e.g. the > macosx one already does) use --enable-werror. > > Devs can manually configure with --enable-werror if it works for their > compiler, which it probably does. agree that this is the most sensible approach. regards, michael _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
