Hi all,
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.8-rc1. This is the first release candidate on the road to
LFS-6.8. It includes numerous changes to LFS-6.7 (including updates to
Linux-2.6.37, GCC-4.5.2, Glibc-2.13 and security fixes). It also includes
e
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the release of LFS Version 6.6. This release
includes numerous changes to LFS-6.5 (including updates to
Linux-2.6.32.8, GCC-4.4.3, Glibc-2.11.1) and security fixes. It also
includes editorial work on the explanatory material throughout the book,
improving both the c
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:04:07 -0800 (PST), Marco Marzetta
wrote:
> Hi, I finished building LFS. Now
> looking through the manual I find BLFS to section 6.3 to install GCC
> version 4.1.2, but in reality GCC is already installed with LFS in
> paragraph 6.15 and in a version 4.4.1. Why should I inst
Hi,
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.6-rc2. This release includes numerous changes to LFS-6.5
(including updates to Linux-2.6.32.8, GCC-4.4.3, Glibc-2.11.1) and
security fixes. It also includes editorial work on the explanatory
material throu
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of LFS Version 6.6-rc1. This release
includes numerous changes to LFS-6.5 (including updates to
Linux-2.6.32.7, GCC-4.4.3, Glibc-2.11.1) and security fixes. It also
includes editorial work on the explanatory material throughout the book,
improving bo
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 22:18:58 -0500, William Immendorf
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I ran into a issue with Mod-python 3.3.1. The issue: It fails to build
> under the new LFS 6.5 toolchain :-(. Just see the attached
> log. Google was of no help.
I'm intrigued what query you sent to google for it t
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 06:43:28 -0600, Jim McConville wrote:
>
> Because the compilation of
> autofs-5.0.3 was done in the "LFS-6.5 chroot" environment the '/proc'
> directory was not populated. To complete the compilation the computer was
> rebooted into LFS-6.5 and the "configuration" and "install"
Hi,
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.5. This release includes numerous changes from LFS-6.4
(including updates to Linux-2.6.30.2, GCC-4.4.1, and Glibc-2.10.1) and
security fixes. It also includes editorial work on the explanatory material
through
Hi,
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.5 Release Candidate 2. This release includes numerous
changes from LFS-6.4 (including updates to Linux-2.6.30.2, GCC-4.4.1,
and Glibc-2.10.1) and security fixes. It also includes editorial work on
the explanat
Hi,
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS Version 6.5 Release Candidate 1. This release includes numerous
changes from LFS-6.4 (including updates to Linux-2.6.30.1, GCC-4.4.0,
Glibc-2.10.1) and security fixes. It also includes editorial work on the
explanatory
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:25:38 +0100, Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I still don't know how to make a patch, I can't be
> more specific
Nicolas,
Here's how to create a patch:
tar xf dvd+rw-tools-7.0.tar.gz
cp -a dvd+rw-tools-7.0 dvd+rw-tools-7.0.orig
cd dvd+rw-tools-7.0
#make you
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:31:19 -0400, Scott Castaline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do have a question though, shouldn't I have been able to do this from
> the LFS LiveCD? It kept coming back with errors of which I can't
> remember right off hand I think no block devices found was being
> reported
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 22:08, Janesh Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Here is the output of amixer. Does it look like something is going wrong
> here ?
>
> -bash-3.1# amixer set PCM 80%
What about `amixer set PCM unmute 80%'? Here's the difference in output I get
between muted and unmuted output:
$ am
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 22:12, Janesh Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Here is the output:
>
> -bash-3.1# amixer sget Master
> amixer: Unable to find simple control 'Master',0
Could you post the output of `amixer controls' please?
Thanks,
Matt.
PS: Please don't top-post. Please put your reply under th
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 22:08, Janesh Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Here is the output of amixer. Does it look like something is going wrong
> here ?
>
> -bash-3.1# amixer set PCM 80%
What does the output of `amixer sget Master' show?
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
Matthew Burgess wrote:
I suspect it'd be quicker just starting from scratch
Here's a wonderful snippet from the latest release of cdrtools
So, another case of NIH syndrome. Rather than report bugs/offer patches
to existing projects (tar vs. star, make vs. smake, etc.) h
Ken Moffat wrote:
Debian has now forked cdrkit (get it from your local debian pool,
the diff on top of pre3 only affects some of the debian/ files).
I wonder how long it'll take them to clean it up? I suspect it'd be
quicker just starting from scratch (and just don't support anything that
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:50 -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Notice below there are several libs Firefox "can't find". However,
it runs perfectly because it has internal knowledge of the whereabouts
of the libs.
Oof, what a terrible example I picked! That happens to work
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1.1. This release includes fixes for all known errata since
LFS-6.1 was released 4 months ago.
You can read the book online at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1.1/ or download it from
http://www.linuxfroms
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The final release is planned for Wednesday 30th November.
Best regards,
Matthew Burgess
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the first
pre-release of LFS 6.1.1. This release includes fixes for all known
errata since LFS-6.1 was released 4 months ago.
You can read the book online at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1.1-pre1/ or download to read
locall
Doug Ronne wrote:
There is a chance this should go to the alfs list since that is where
I first ran into the trouble, but I got the error by hand too. During
the second pass of gcc, I get a bunch of errors and the first error
that shows up is with /usr/included/gmp.h (a huge pile of syntax
error
Paul Lewis wrote:
I was just wondering if anyone could shed any light on this for me - have I
done it right by specifying the path as /{.usr/}lib in the specs file, or do
I need to enter the path twice, or is there some other method that I've
overlooked?
From 6.12 (about half way down):
"Next
Torsten Vollmann wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a separate ML for specifically cross-lfs questions?
thanks.
Yes, it was just recently created. See
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-lfs/ for details.
Is it run through the mail2news
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
is there a separate ML for specifically cross-lfs questions?
thanks.
Yes, it was just recently created. See
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-lfs/ for details.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://
Paul Lewis wrote:
Hi,
I'm using LFS 6.1, and have come across a problem when I try to compile TCL
(version 8.4.9, as recommended by the book).
...
\".so\" ./../compat/strstr.c
./../compat/strstr.c: In function 'strstr':
./../compat/strstr.c:67: error: 'NULL' undeclared (first use in this
fun
Jasper Leemans wrote:
Should I be worried or just ignore the error, sda is it scsi or sata?
...anyway I don't have any of those, but I just don't like errors :-D
You can safely ignore the error. It's actually caused by us moving
coreutils' `test' binary from /usr/bin to /bin. The udev test
Henry Grefrath wrote:
Hi Tony,
I was hoping I could build a small system on this laptop. It has 32MB of
RAM and I setup a 75MB swap partition. The rest of the hard disk 1.2GB
is mounted as /mnt/lfs.
I think you might struggle with that, I'm afraid. Building just chapter
5 on an Athlon XP 2
jaca wrote:
Hello Jim,
Wednesday, October 19, 2005, 5:21:01 PM, you wrote:
JG> I just tested the Sparc64 multilib version. No problems here.
JG> Can you verify /etc/passwd, /etc/group, /etc/shadow, and /etc/gshadow exist.
In addition to Jim's recommendations, also check your /etc/nsswitch.co
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
I remember reading on the glibc mailing list that glibc is always
backward compatible, i.e. an application compiled for glibc-2.2 should
work on a glibc-2.3 system.
Yes, but have you actually tried to upgrade a glibc installation in-situ
(i.e. on the OS you're currentl
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
As long as you are upgrading the toolchain packages (not downgrading)
everything should be ok, especially if they have the same major (and
minor version?)
I think glibc is still an exception here, though I wouldn't like to bet
any amount of money on that! I do, howeve
Oliver Burtchen wrote:
the group "cdrom" is missing in /etc/group, but is used in the udev-rules
provided by lfs.
Thanks Oliver. I've entered this into bugzilla now (bug 1639), so we
can't forget about it!
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: htt
Jaqui Greenlees wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
LSB - no. The LSB is for providers of binary
software, among other things it mandates RPM as a package manager,
really? I never saw a package manager requirement in
it.
http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/sw
Brian Burch wrote:
root:/# type -pa ld
/usr/bin/ld
root:/#
OK, so it's obviously there. Perhaps it's linked to something in /tools
that is no longer there (you're very courageous to have removed it
already!). What do `ldd /usr/bin/ld', `readelf -l /usr/bin/ld | grep
interpreter' and `ld -
Brian Burch wrote:
root:/sources/linux-2.6.11.12# make menuconfig
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
collect2: cannot find `ld'
Hmm, `ld' should have been installed in both /tools (by chapter 5
instructions) and later in /usr (by chapter 6 instructions). I'm
surprised you've got as far as chapt
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of the book (6.1), there's a confusion on page 103: 'console'
and 'null' are mounted twice and 'console' with different modes (622
seems to be the correct choice).
The first pair of devices are what we need to start
rick wrote:
I have finally managed to get to step 5.5, Installation of
Linux-Libc-Headers without any errors but now am stuck.
The instructions given on pg. 57 in Linux From Scratch ver
6.1 show performing a cp from (what I believe) is my
original partition...
"cp -R include/asm-i386 /tools
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
bash: /tools/bin/ranlib: No such file or directory
but it IS there.
Does the FAQ help here at all?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#any-no-such-file
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc
Julien Demoor wrote:
[re-arranged top-posted material - please see
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/#netiquette]
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Something went wrong with your glibc installation.
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 should be installed by chapter 5 glibc
(section 5.6).
>
> In /m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: ld-linux.so.2, needed by /tools/lib/libc.so.6, not found (try using
-rpath or -rpath-link)
Something went wrong with your glibc installation.
/tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2
Bhishma wrote:
This is my first lfs install, and i am experiencing some problems.
What version are you trying to build?
I am trying to compile gcc (second pass) and it cannot found the
gnu/stub.h file.
That file doesn't exist on my machine, maybe it would help if you copied
and pasted the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, is there a reason that sending mail from a gmail web client
is always blocked ? It says the it suspect that the subject
contains spam, even if is one word (like error).In fact,this message
is sent from telnet
Try turning off the "Rich Formatting" feature of gmai
Björn Schlögl wrote:
I actually do not follow the lfs books, but i try to compile a linux system
for myself. As a last resort i write to this mailing list:
Well, as you're not following LFS instructions I doubt anyone here will
be able to offer much help either. I'd strongly suggest using LFS
chris coneway wrote:
So I go to the config log and the cofigure progam that
failed was confdefs.h program failed.
Hmm, you're missing some vital information here - what did config.log
complain about specifically when attempting to compile the failing program?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/
Atchu Reddy wrote:
I am trying to install lfs 6.1.
I was following the book for the same.When trying to install TCL,i am
getting an error at the make command
../compat/strstr.c: In function `strstr':
../compat/strstr.c:67: error: `NULL' undeclared (first use in this function)
../compat
Matt Sanchez wrote:
I tracked the build failure to gawk in the libgpg-error build scripts. I
went to the gawk ftp site, found a version 3.1.5, uninstalled gawk 3.1.4
from LFS 6.1, and built and installed gawk 3.1.5. When I tested the build of
libgpg-error (version 1.1), lo and behold it built.
Chris Staub wrote:
If it's running out
of memory, the only solution is to free up more by finding programs to
close.
Or, presumably, adding some more swap space though that's going to be
slower than adding/freeing more RAM.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: ht
Andrew Benton wrote:
Tarek Ghaleb wrote:
I take back what I wrote about Fedora. I think Fedora uses a 755
permission as well.
And SuSE, Slack and Mandrake. They all set permissions at 755. Only
Debian (and Ubuntu) set the permissions at 644.
Ncurses seems to work OK on Ubuntu so I don't kno
Mark Twombley wrote:
Matt I realize you probably already know how to do this but just incase
someone else is following this thread I thought it might help them on how I
solved their own problems.
Indeed, thanks very much for the followup. It's amazing the number of
times I've scoured the web
Mark Twombley wrote:
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on \
unknown-block(0,0)
I'm assuming that my SCSI driver didn't install but I'm not sure. I
can't use the shift-PgUp to see what was loaded and I can't see a log.
Did you compile your SCSI driver or your roo
Andrew Benton wrote:
In Gnome, when I run Nautilus in browser fashion it has a computer icon
on the toolbar. If I click on it it shows me floppy, CD-ROM and mp3. If
I click on them it mounts it and then shows the contents. To unmount it
I right click and choose Unmount Volume before removing i
Seth Payne wrote:
> chroot: cannot run command `/tools/bin/env': No such file or directory
Seth,
I realise you've sorted your problem now, but I thought I'd take this
opportunity to remind folks of our FAQ page, which just happens to
answer this question and many more too.
http://www.linuxfr
Paul Millar wrote:
'configure:error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile'
After which I think it would also say to take a look at config.log.
Does that provide any clues? If not, upload it and post a link to it
and we can take a look for you.
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://lin
Rainer Peter Feller wrote:
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 11:08 +0100, Dom wrote:
Hi, ive just started the lfs project, and already I've hit problems
I may have just missed it, but where about should I bunzip and untar the
files for (like on the liveCD, you get the file
binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2.tar.bz2)
Randy McMurchy wrote:
The ability to play files encoded with FLAC is what you lose. I
don't think that is a very big deal.
It's certainly more than offset (IMO of course) by the diskspace one
gains by not having those massive FLAC files lying around :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
S. Anthony Sequeira wrote:
A quick question about the errata, should the versions in the book be
built and then upgraded to the recommended versions, or would the
initial build be done with the recommended versions?
I can't foresee any problems just building with the versions recommended
in t
Charles Notley wrote:
I was using the mips cross-compile documents located here:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/cross-lfs/
but they have since moved or been removed. Can anyone tell me where
to find them now?
They're back at that location now. Due to a stupid error I made in the
sc
Jim Gifford wrote:
Jim, please please please, for the sake of everyone's sanity, can you
learn to trim your quotes please. Quoting Ken's *entire* email to add
just 2 lines is completely unnecessary.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www
root wrote:
So, I use knoppix, which has a kernel
2.4.22-xfs.
Please re-read
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1/prologue/hostreqs.html.
Recent versions of knoppix come with a 2.6 kernel which can be booted
into using a boot parameter.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinf
David Rosal wrote:
it seems that e2fsprogs installs identical files with different
names instead of simply symlink them.
Is there any technical reason to make thinks like this?
Can I replace one of each couple of identical files by a symlink?
Some programs act differently dependent on how th
David Rosal wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to build a mini-LFS, and wanted to know if I can get rid of
all files installed by module-init-tools, since I haven't enabled module
loading support in the kernel.
No definite answer I'm afraid. My suspicion is that it should be fine.
Although I don't us
Ken Moffat wrote:
For glibc, the _safe_ advice is always to rebuild the whole system :)
I can personally attest to that, having made the fatal error of doing a
'make install' from the wrong xterm and overwriting the host's libc.
Not even 'ls' coped with that tiny mistake!
Binutils and gc
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
steve crosby wrote:
Another option is to apply the FC2\3 workaround permanently - change
the book instructions to download, compile and use e2fsprogs from LFS
to create the LFS partition always, and never use the host tools.
Although that would work for all e2fs problems
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
Yep. I won't give up before it works as a non-module, this time...!
Would be a bummer having to have root on an old ATA when I have two
big new SATA-disks (with NCQ, no less!) ready to be raid0-striped... :-)
But as you mentioned the NV SATA driver in your prior messag
Coneway, Christopher Darius (Christopher) wrote:
???What!
Please don't top-post and please trim your replies. We already got
Jose's message the first time, we don't need it *all* again. See
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/index.html#netiquette.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfroms
Peter Odding wrote:
However, I noticed while downloading the packages (for stable)
that man-pages-2.01 has gone missing from kernel.org and most mirrors.
Ah, so it has! As luck would have it, man-pages is probably the easiest
and safest package to upgrade, so using any version (e.g. today's 2
David Lyne wrote:
TEST 104: temporary node creation test
device '/block/sda' expecting node 'node'
add: error
Can't exec "tree": No such file or directory at ./udev-test.pl line 1371.
It's been reported at least once before:
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2
Daryn Neadow wrote:
Does anyone know why the version of binutils was dropped back for the just
released 6.1 version?
The last SVN version I was running was 20050608 and had binutils-2.16 in it
while the 6.1 version just released has 2.15.94.0.2.2?
It didn't drop back. The way we develop the b
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1. This release includes a large number of package upgrades
(including Linux-2.6.11.12, GCC-3.4.3 and Glibc-2.3.4) and security
fixes (including the recently disclosed zlib vulnerability). It also
includes a large am
José Carlos Carrión Plaza wrote:
Dear list members:
Anyone knows about the gentoo linux security advisor labeled «GLSA
200507-05 / zlib»?
Yep, we've fixed this in LFS-6.1-pre2 and also the devlopment (trunk)
version of the book.
But which are the programs of LFS and BLFS that are been
co
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1-pre2. This pre-release for the upcoming final 6.1 revision of
the book includes a patch to fix a recently disclosed security bug in zlib.
You can read the book online at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/6.1-pr
steve crosby wrote:
From udev-047, udevd is capable of handling hotplug events from
modules, as well as devices, and knows to call the appropriate hotplug
rc script related to the module. (at module load, a hotplug event is
generated by the kernel, and calls whatever is defined as the hotplug
ha
Dan McGhee wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Dan McGhee wrote:
My question is this: After backing up the scripts I have changed in
both /etc/sysconfig and /etc/rc.d/init.d, can I just run the
"install" commands for the udev packages and the bootscripts?
Yes, updating to lfs-b
Hi folks.
http://tidy.sourceforge.net/docs/quickref.html#newline states that the
newline character is detected automatically, and an 'LF' should be
output for Linux/Unix systems. My tidied HTML files have DOS line
endings (CRLF), but I'm running it (and compiled it) on a Linux box so
the lin
The Linux From Scratch community is pleased to announce the release of
LFS 6.1-pre1. This pre-release for the upcoming final 6.1 revision of
the book includes a large number of package upgrades and security fixes.
It also includes a fair amount of editorial work on the explantory
material throug
steve crosby wrote:
just building now with udev-059. One change is that udevstart now
launches udev as a process (with a --daemon flag), so you can't umount
/dev without stopping that process (/dev is reported as busy), so we
might need to modify the "Booting into LFS" section.
Other than some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm building (or at least trying) LFS 6.0. Everything went good I think,
but when doing 5.34: Perl-5.8.5 I encounter a strange error:
make first states it's skipping lib/auto/Fnctl/Fnctl.a because the
directory does not exist. Then it says:
Try 'IO Fcntl POSIX'
Dan McGhee wrote:
My question is this:
After backing up the scripts I have changed in both /etc/sysconfig and
/etc/rc.d/init.d, can I just run the "install" commands for the udev
packages and the bootscripts?
Yes, updating to lfs-bootscripts-3.2.2, udev-058 and the newer udev
rules file sh
Hi everyone!
I finally got around to updating the SpamAssasin rulesets for the
mailing lists today (thanks to Jim Gifford for giving me explicit
instructions!).
I'd be interested to know if you:
1) Notice a significant decrease in the levels of spam on the lists
2) Continue to receive spam
3
Alexander Darino wrote:
genmodes.o errors.o ../libiberty/libiberty.a
/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc
collect2: ld returned 1 exist status
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#cannot-find-lc
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FA
David Ciecierski wrote:
root:/tools/bin# ls find
find
root:/tools/bin# ./find --help
bash: ./find: No such file or directory
It probably compiled against the wrong libc (or some other library) due
to the specs file changes. If you do an 'ldd /tools/bin/find' it should
tell you what librarie
Speek wrote:
It doesn't seem to work for me. I've tried it now with Crux 2.1 and
Slackware current as host systems. Maybe something has changed in
recent versions of tcl or expect?
OK, can you fall back to an earlier version of tcl then - tcl-8.4.9, for
example. There was an earlier report t
Speek wrote:
To the LFS developers: is this a bug or is it something with my (and
Brads) host system? My host system is Crux 2.1. Let me know if I can
help figuring this out.
I'm not sure. What do your source and build directory layouts look like?
I know some folks have run into problems whe
gabriel wrote:
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-cancelx17.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
Has anyone got any idea what causes this error?
My memory is hazy, searching the mailing list archives may prove more
reliable! However, I think this is caused by particular c
ravi kumar wrote:
can anyone help me installing libstdc++ in
fedora core 2 linux.
Ravi, I think you've got the wrong mailing list. This is for the
discussion of problems related to installing a Linux system according to
the instructions given in the Linux From Scratch book (see
h
Ken Moffat wrote:
The repeated grep -v invocations sure burn up CPU cycles, but for me
its worth it to remove _most_ of the irrelevant changes. When I do this
for blfs on a running system there are still occasional irrelevant
changes, e.g. to /etc/ntp.drift, so use with care.
Ken, FWIW my sc
Ken Moffat wrote:
the mail from the script works
fine so I guess this is an fcron problem. The mta is postfix. Any
ideas ?
mail? mta? postfix? fcron? Might the folks on blfs-support be more help? :)
Cheers,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.
Jim McLaren wrote:
Secondly I tried to post to the newsgroups rather than use the mailing list,
but I wasn't allowed to post. Is the problem at my end or do I have to post
through the mailing lists?
No the problem is at our end. We use news->mail and mail->news gateways
to keep the two ser
Jim Gifford wrote:
Repeating the post will probably get your issue ignored.
Your problem is with DejaGNu, try an older version or cvs.
With all due respect Jim, I don't think it's DejaGnu that caused all
those missing and incompatible symbols, though I don't know what would.
Matt.
--
http://linux
Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
i have completed my LFS 6.0 and when i tried to boot lfs, i got this error
*error
checking file systems...
fsck.ext2: Filesystem has unsupported feature(s) (/dev/hdb5)
e2fsck: Get a newer version of
Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
hi,
i know it is told in BLFS,but if u see the hints section of LFS,it is
there?..am i making a mistake or it is BLFS??
Well, the general rule is that if the packages you are having problems
with are in the LFS book, then lfs-support is the right place to post
your request
Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
has anyone installed X11 in LFS 6.0??...i just got this section of
Installing WindowMaker in LFS Hints section,
Please post to blfs-support instead.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
U
lin q wrote:
My question is does Ada get compiled in the 2nd build?
No. Basically, the chapter 5 '--without-ada' option is a safeguard
against those hosts that might have an ada compiler installed. By
specifiying the option, we ensure that the ./configure script doesn't
try to find an ada co
Andreas Fehr wrote:
Sorry, but I'm to lazy
to send a mail to subscribe, a mail to confirm, a mail with the bugs and
a mail to unsubscribe the dev-list.
You don't have to subscribe to the mailing lists to post (just ask the
spammers!). Not subscribing means that you'll have to request CC's of
an
Ken Moffat wrote:
I'm a little uncertain which
version to point you at, I think Matt was going to fix up some minor
issues, so maybe the 'testing-20050428' is the closest we've got to a
6.1 release.
Yeah, I've been really pressed for time just recently.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/tes
HAUPT Clemens wrote:
>snipped
a) Please don't respond to spam, other list members may have spam
filters meaning they never got the original. Your response may mean
they see the spam after all, otherwise they'll see a response to a
message they never received.
b) Did you really have to quote the
Donal Farrell wrote:
Hi there. I'm having tons of trouble with Xorg6.8.2 in BLFS-6.0 When I
do Xorg -configure
Please post to the blfs-support list instead; this list is for the
discussion of LFS related support queries only.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-supp
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
I've simply had trouble getting the nv driver to behave like a normal
driver. Last time I tried it, I couldn't get it to run 1024x768x24.
Same here, when doing an `xorg -configure' at least. Running through
`xorgconfig' got it working just fine though, and like Andrew, I'm
Jens Olav Nygaard wrote:
Is there any standard way of doing
such things, some sort of "sandbox" technique that I may not be aware
of? Any advice greatly appreciated...
I've generally had good results with '--prefix=/opt/gcc-4.0.0-20050410'.
BTW: You'll have to omit the fixincludes patch from your
Jason Gurtz wrote:
> Straying OT here but I saw the recent announcment from Via over their
> contribution of open source drivers for the S3 and their other brands
> chips and also from Volari.
There's also the fully open graphics card currently being developed by
techsource. The mailing list is a
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
