hi and thanks.
thats not exact what i had in mind.
when i.e. there is a directory /mnt/x than you can cp something into /mnt/x
but when you mount something in /mnt/x
than what you copied there is hidden till you umount.
when creating device-nodes $LFS/dev/console and $LFS/dev/null and
bind-mount ho
they
simply have to exists when in the end the system is actually booted ?
good school! thanks
2013/9/16 Ken Moffat
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:36:20PM +0200, andreas graeper wrote:
> >
> > book-version is 7.0, see subject.
>
> And that, in linux terms, is ancient his
2013/9/15 Bruce Dubbs
> andreas graeper wrote:
> > hi,
> > i was looking for mail-archives using the link
> > linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/
> > but got a 'page not found' ?
>
> They were turned off due to bandwidth/cost consideratio
/tools/
i installed autoconf and automake as all the other tools into /tools
and warning has gone.
cheers andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ive one is found and i get that warning.
do i have to configure gcc once again with support for c++, so that
cross-g++ is build and installed. or can i ignore that warning, cause g++
is not actually used to build glibc ?
thanks in advance
andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-s
thing?
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ne 3: `uname -m)'
This runs nicely with `uname -m`. Same behavior exists with
the .../bin/bash (instead of ../tools/bin/bash).
Instead the same test file run with the host bash:
#!/bin/bash
DD=$(uname -m)
echo $DD
come back nicely with
i686
Any ideas? AM I doing something wrong?
Thank
hello,
i am trying the non-stable version and it stopped in chapter 5.9 with this:
l...@battlecat:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ CC="$LFS_TGT-gcc
-B/tools/lib/"AR=$LFS_TGT-ar RANLIB=$LFS_TGT-ranlib
../binutils-2.20/configure --prefix=/tools--disable-nls
--with-lib-path=/tools/lib
checki
Hi,
i had a similar problem, i just compiled make in the chroot environment
after wards. all went fine. but you need the chroot command from 6.4, so
that /tools/bin is present in PATH
good luck
2009/11/8 pieter blomme
> Hi,
>
> I finally got to building the real LFS-environment. However, afte
On Monday, 28. April 2008, 22:21, Jeremy Huntwork (as JH) wrote:
>JH: Andreas, you may want to try to track down what differences there are
>JH: between Ubuntu's grub and what LFS installs.
Ok, I patched grub with the files from Ubuntu, didn't help.
So I bzipped all my files,
in relation to the file system that you are
>RM: using. They are all file system specific.
Yes, I copied stage1 and 2 and the stage1_5 for ext2. And just to be
sure, I copied all the other files as well. The devices.map file seems
correct and the kernel file in the menu is availa
to re-install the boot loader anyway, has somebody some
information on grub2? All I saw, grub2 doesn't have the same syntax as
grub legacy. There is a converter file for my menu file but what
commands do I have to use to load grub into MBR?
Thanks,
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.
t;JF: need to use yaboot.
- I use grub on my MacBook (Santa Rosa) without problem
- Ubuntu boots with grub on the very same Mac mini
Thanks anyway,
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t with my own eyes :-)
>JH: Andreas, you may want to try to track down what differences there
>JH: are between Ubuntu's grub and what LFS installs. Or, you could
>JH: consider using Lilo instead. :) I use Lilo on my Intel macs (mostly
>JH: because I build a 64-bit system) and it w
roblem? What is grub waiting for?
Thanks for any help,
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Original Message
Subject: building LFS
From: Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LFS Support List
Date: Freitag, 07. Dezember 2007 01:02:59
> Andreas Hofer wrote:
>> Original Message
>> Subject: building LFS
>> From: Randy McMurchy <
Just my thoughts.
>
I don't agree. I had exactly the same problem and solved it more by
guessing. But, maybe an addition to the general advice explaining that
after unpacking and cd'ing to the source directory some packages require
to build in a dedicated build directora
d you look at cross-lfs: your target
> environment is really a different environment than the one you're planning to
> build on, and therefore you need a cross-compiler.
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>
> -Original Message
Original Message
Subject: Install LFS on Vortex86SX (486SX core)
From: Wilco Beekhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LFS Support List
Date: Montag, 03. Dezember 2007 22:59:51
> 2007/12/3, Andreas Hofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wa
kernel
crashes very soon. So I want to sort of cross build LFS for the
Vortex86SX on my notebook (Core2Duo 1.6GHz Ubuntu 7.10).
Question: Is that possible and how? What do I have to do that the
binaries incl. tool chain will run on the target?
Cheers,
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
pdf version.
thanks for your answers.
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Ken Moffat skrev:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Andreas Åberg wrote:
>
>>>> 1. Yes they exist.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Yes i can run /bin/bash, and everything else to.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Odd. In that case, the primary suspect has to be a linking pro
Ken Moffat skrev:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Andreas Åberg wrote:
>
>>>
>>> What we know so far:
>>>
>>> (i) hda3 does have a reiserfs filesystem.
>>> (ii)the kernel isn't able to run either /sbin/init or /bin/bash on
>>> hda3.
Ken Moffat skrev:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Andreas Åberg wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> I have compiled a uClibc HLFS system and everything seems to be ok until
>> i try to boot it.
>>
>> (the hda3 gets mounted here without any problem)
>> VFS: Mounted root (reiserfs
Matthias B. skrev:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:51:52 +0200 Andreas Åberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi
>> I have compiled a uClibc HLFS system and everything seems to be ok until
>> i try to boot it.
>>
>> (the hda3 gets mounted here withou
everything... help!!!
I tried to change init to init=/sbin/init and init=/bin/bash and init=3
but it has no effect what so ever...
//Andreas
these are my menu.list, .config, fstab, inittab
menu.lst:
# By default boot the first menu entry.
default 0
# Allow 30 seconds before booting the default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply. For sure, you are much
> more advanced than me at this stage :). At this moment
> I feel a little lost... For example, "6.11.
> Glibc-2.3.4" - the documentation states "routines for
> allo
em. For example i added a DHCP client,
ppp and the ISDN/CAPI stack and removed all development stuff (gcc, make,
autoconf, include files, etc.), most of
kernel modules and locale specific file as well as the man pages. I dont
need perl, vim, and so on.
You could consider using the BusyBox but the sav
On Sat, 21 May 2005, 19:26, Chakkaradeep C C (as CCC) wrote:
>CCC: so how to make my LFS to be put into a Live CD like Knoppix and
>CCC: test...??
>CCC:
>CCC: i would be happy if friends could help me out...
Why not just use lfs-livecd from ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.de/pub/lfs-livecd/
--
http://lin
LG: label="Linux"
>MLG: >MLG: read-only
>MLG: >MLG:
>MLG: >MLG: other="/backup/boot/lfskernel-2.6.8.1"
>MLG:
>MLG:
>MLG: Are you sure, you want /backup/ in the kernel path??
>MLG:
>MLG: Andreas
>MLG:
read-only
>MLG:
>MLG: other="/backup/boot/lfskernel-2.6.8.1"
Are you sure, you want /backup/ in the kernel path??
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
o if you have / and /usr on the same partition, I think
this isn't a problem. But for consistency, I'd copy them to /lib.
Andreas (other might tear me apart and have other ideas on this)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/f
I don't get it. Do you want to install LFS or some other Linux
distribution? Why install any Linux distribution, if you replace it with
LFS some hours later??
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sun, 8 May 2005, 11:48, Matthew Burgess (as MB) wrote:
> MB: Andreas Fehr wrote:
> MB: > Sorry, but I'm to lazy to send a mail to subscribe, a mail to
> MB: > confirm, a mail with the bugs and a mail to unsubscribe the
> MB: > dev-list.
> MB:
> MB: You don
On Sat, 7 May 2005, 09:52, Jeremy Huntwork (as JH) wrote:
> JH: Andreas Fehr wrote:
> JH: >
> JH: > I guess, this list is as good as any other place.
> JH:
> JH: Actually, the lfs-dev list is where development topics go, so book
> JH: fixes should be noted there.
On Sat, 7 May 2005, 08:24, Andreas Fehr (as AF) wrote:
>AF: On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, 08:28, Jeremy Huntwork (as JH) wrote:
>AF:
>AF: > JH: Although it's not 100% complete, and may contain a few bugs,
>AF: > JH: there's a multi-arch LFS book under development with a
ents.jg555.com/multi-arch/ppc/
Where should I send corrections? I found some error in the ppc document.
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
d that you referenced (I
> RM: have it locally) does it say that 6.1's been released.
Well, did I say LFS 6.1 is out? No, just the last response to this very
same question was sent some hours ago. And as you have the other thread,
why start a new one?
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscr
ust today, some hours ago.
So please browse the archive.
(This is my opinion, others might have different and give you some other
answer)
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
t have
the docbook and libxls and other files needed to create the html files.
Do you have any information on the release of this document?
Thanks,
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
ents.jg555.com/multi-arch/ppc/
Jeremy, thanks again for the answer, but as I wanted to access the
documentation some minutes ago, there was only an error message. Is the
ppc book somewhere to download or accessible on the internet?
Thanks, Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi
available for free if you
download them from the net.
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, 17:29, Info by Giardina Software (as IbGS) wrote:
> IbGS: sorry Andreas and jeremy for my intrusion (OT),
> IbGS:
> IbGS: do you know if is it possible to build a snap image under ppc
> IbGS: platform, always with lfs guide, of 128-256M?
check ftp.lfs-matri
rnels on the ppc, I just use the uncompressed
> JH: kernel, the 'vmlinux' file that shows up in the top of the kernel
> JH: tree after you're done compiling.
Thanks, this did work... :-)
Andreas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux
LFS book under development with a ppc section. It might be a
> JH: good reference for you:
> JH:
> JH: http://documents.jg555.com/multi-arch/ppc/
Yes, this looks just like the thing I have to use well, there goes
the next weekend, as I have to re-install a new LFS... ;-(
Thanks,
An
I found 6 or 7
files that might be kernels. which one do I have to copy into my
/boot directory?
(none of the i386 systems I set up had similar problems)
(and yes, I did use some .config file of ydl (though I'm not sure it was
the most recent one))
Thanks for any hint,
Andreas
--
http://
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Alexander
> E. Patrakov
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:17 AM
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: RE: Building LFS without gcc, make, etc.
>
>
> Winter Andreas wro
>
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:14:29 +0200
> Winter Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, good book. I have followed the book and everything worked. But
> > now I want to end up whith a system without any development
> tools. Of
> > course I can tr
Hi Andrew,
> Winter Andreas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after having successfully build a running LFS, I tried to
> build a system
> > without gcc, make and other development tools (the goal is
> to build a
> > minimal system). So I started by skipping the
from /usr/include to /tools/include (just the
other way round), so that all .h files end up in /tools/include. Is this a
reasonable solution if I don't want to build the gcc, etc. in chap 6?
Regards
Andreas
PS:
LFS is a great piece of work and real fun ;-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailm
50 matches
Mail list logo