but it should
work on 32bit too, isn't it?
Any ideas?
Thank you!
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
erver
behind it) and others (k3b, digicam) which all do rely on KDE4 in the
future.
Which alternatives do we have? XFCE 4.6.1 is nearly a year old now, is
there active development? Gnome? twm...
--
Thomas
Is it all bad only to me or do you feel same?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blf
Am Sonntag, den 02.03.2014, 08:36 -0500 schrieb baho utot:
> Why is the installation of the headers in the book like this
>
> make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=dest headers_install
> cp -rv dest/include/* /tools/include
>
> instead of
>
> make INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/tools/include headers_install
if at all, than
ribute a bit
more to the (B)LFS project.
>
> BR,
>
> Thierry
>
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Am Samstag, den 05.04.2014, 16:41 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> Working with systemd, there seem to be lots of "learning" issues.
>
> I was trying to watch the boot sequence and the screen clears and I get
> a login prompt. How to disable clearing the screen? Well that's simple
> enough:
>
> m
Am Samstag, den 05.04.2014, 19:17 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 04/06/2014 01:19 AM, thomas wrote:
> >> Am Samstag, den 05.04.2014, 16:41 -0500 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> >>> Working with systemd, there seem to be lots of "learning" issue
-
NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0“ as licence but by mistake wrote "2.0"?
Please can you clarify this? It is important to know because I have to choose
the correct translated license text from creativecommons.org for the book.
Cheers and thank you :-)
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
Am Sonntag 16 November 2008 09:31:20 schrieb Thomas Reitelbach:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm currently in the process of translating current 6.4 LFS to german.
> Now I'm wondering about licensing. The book says it's licensed under
> „Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0
problem to include german as well :-)
Thank you very much!
Thomas
Index: lfs-l10n.xml
===
--- lfs-l10n.xml(Revision 8742)
+++ lfs-l10n.xml(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -72,4 +72,20 @@
+
+ http://docbook.sourceforge.net
of creative commons.
Hm, what a longish explanation ;-)
Cheers
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lso includes editorial work on the explanatory material
> throughout the book, improving both the clarity and accuracy of the text.
Thank you for all your good work :-)
The german translation is already available at my site.
http://oss.erdfunkstelle.de/lfs-de/
Cheers
Thomas
signature.asc
Descrip
ext is too long, which makes
it break into the next line.
I'll have to modify the margin in such a way, that the column with "22 SBU"
has more space to the left. But I cannot find the correct place in the books
stylesheets. Can someone please point me to the correct place?
he release. I'm of course not
one of those people to decide such things. But for the last releases i
believe that someone (who?) resolved rendering issues like this with the
book.
I'll try to fix my german PDFs. If I'm successfull I'll of course have a look
On Mittwoch, 26. November 2008, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:53:37 +0100, Thomas Reitelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah, I think that would have been Manuel, our XSL guru. Unfortunately,
> he's been off-list for some time and Bruce and I decided that
d.
The problem on your side will be to find a publisher to publish a book like
LFS because it's very specialized and will have a low print run. The costs
will be high because you'll probably sell not too much books.
Cheers and a happy new year :)
Thomas
signature.asc
Description:
On Donnerstag, 1. Januar 2009, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> > Lookling at the books licence general I would say, you can publish your
> > translated book in any form if you like.
>
> Um, no. The license is NonCommercial.
>
> "You may not exerc
ave deleted all the cookies, histories,
cached data and so on.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Tar/t/03_file.ok
lib/Archive/Tar/t/04_resolved_issues..ok
...
Google doesn't tell me much about this one.
Everything else seems to compile/check/install fine and even the glibc shows
nothing except the ignored annexc.out-error.
-
ure was caused by a mistake of mine somehow.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
will test it tomorrow with the 64bit SLES10. Will have to redo the whole
installation but when it helps its ok.
Hey, thanks a lot for your help! I'll keep you updated.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
B and than the system seems to reorganize the cache. Everything fine.
So, we didn't solve the problem but we know a workaround by using 64bit.
Thanks to all you guys!
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
The description of "cpan-run-perl" in sec. 6.33.2 ("Contents of perl") in LFS
Version 6.6 (and 6.5 as well) currently reads as follows:
"Perl script that (description needed)"
I suggest changing that in the development version to:
"Perl script used to enable autoflushing in spawned processes"
Chap. 3.2 lists the following info for zlib:
Zlib (1.2.3) - 415 KB:
Home page: http://www.zlib.net/
Download: http://www.zlib.net/zlib-1.2.3.tar.bz2
Because of the release of zlib-1.2.4, the zlib home page has removed the
1.2.3 download. I suggest adding the following erratum:
Zlib (1.
ere:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg137465.html
--
Thomas
diff -Naur iproute2-2.6.35.orig/ip/iproute.c iproute2-2.6.35/ip/iproute.c
--- iproute2-2.6.35.orig/ip/iproute.c 2010-08-04 19:45:59.0 +0200
+++ iproute2-2.6.35/ip/iproute.c 2010-08-14 07:09:32.0 +0200
@@ -160,7 +160,7
or a domU kernel... Dunno how it is nowadays.
--
Thomas
On Thursday 19 August 2010 06:54:43 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Has anyone built lfs as a xen client? I've tried a couple of kernel
> builds, but they didn't work. I'm very new to xen and haven't worked
> wtih it befo
strange message dissapeared and no crash
(so far).
My suggestion is to upgrade the book to ~.3 - it does not cost much (the
changes to ~.2 are not too many) but it seems to fix some heavy issues with
the guarding pages or so.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ
Hi,
oops, sorry, I missed that there is a patch in the book! The version I built
must be based on XMLs which are a bit older - just before the patch went in
(even though /etc/lfs-release tells me 20100810).
Ok, the most important thing is that these issues are known and addressed.
--
Thomas
On Sunday 19 September 2010 22:56:08 Matthew Burgess wrote:
> ...
> Sadly, I caught this too late for 6.7, oh well!
> ...
Isn't releasing a 6.7.1 an option? Can jhalfs handle erratas? If not, the .1
release would be nice!
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
already covered in
> another thread, but it should be done by default where possible.
>
> * Anything else that I've missed
>
> -- DJ Lucas
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
e a list of installed files (This is only for book editors, but I
figured I'd drop it in as an example of what could be done with
it):
cd package_dir
for dir in `find . -type d`
do
ls -ld $dir | sed -e "s@ ./@ /@" -e "/ .\$/d"
done > ../../autoconf-&autoconf-versi
On Sunday 03 April 2011 20:21:01 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > I just commited a set of new pages with instructions for KDE4.
>
> Thomas,
>
> I finally got around to trying to update the packages master repository
> and cannot find the sources where the
d automoc4 and DocBook XML/XSL
Yup. Regarding all the dependencies I hope you all will help out a bit to fix
all those inaccuracies!
Thanks for the reports!
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
things
> for none-package-management uses then it could be applied with a minimum
> of discussion really.
>
I noticed the patch too but haven't had time to thoroughly review it
yet. But I would say before it does get applied a new stable release of
jhalfs as there have been a few fixes si
as a dependency of validxml)
After looking at this all that is needed is to add the following line
to common/libs/func_book_parser right after we check out the sources.
cd ${PROGNAME}-$LFSVRS; bash process-scripts.sh >> $LOGDIR/$LOG 2>&1 ; cd ..
This quells all those messages.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Feb 17, 2012, at 5:22 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>
>> cd ${PROGNAME}-$LFSVRS; bash process-scripts.sh >> $LOGDIR/$LOG 2>&1 ; cd ..
>
> May I suggest: pushd ${PROGNAME}-$LFSVRS; ...; popd
>
> It's a little more robust.
Yes, your r
the
> installed files.
>
>
There is actually already functionality in jhalfs to do that already, Cant
remember which menu it's under but we can create installed files logs.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
poke at that one from time to time as well...
>
I would second that one, I love git so much more than subversion.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
create a file named
/etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules
This file can even be a symlink to /dev/null. It seems that only the existence
of such a file relevant.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
I've built lfs on the pi successfully several times now. I roughly followed
the instructions here:
http://www.intestinate.com/pilfs/
... but used my own scripts. I built it natively but that website's author used
qemu.
Tom
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http:/
Hi,
on http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/ as well as on
ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/conglomeration/tar/ the patch is not there.
Did I miss something?
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq
Hi,
just a note, current svn-version referres to kbd-2.0.1-backspace-1.patch but
only the 2.0.0 version is on the server.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
worth adding to the errata for 7.4 ?
>
> Also, on 5 of the 6 machines (desktops, running 3.11 or later
> kernels) the last/last test in 2.24 fails when running the tests as
> a user on a completed system before installing the newer version. It
> was ok on my server which is using a 3
items, for example the
wiki, or the source browser.
This can be fixed by adding a custom field, if you wish. See
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wiki/TracTicketsCustomFields
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscrib
available...
> I will be active
> march 2nd and should last around 416 days. Maybe who knows...
>
> Later everyone! Don't fight while I'm gone. LFS don't kill people!
> People kill people!
Good text!
Anyway, good luck and let&
y for the noise...
Thomas (Moody)
___
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfrom
On Saturday 04 March 2006 18:15, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> For that quickly made a patch - see below.
I should append it then...
Submitted by: Thomas Trepl
Date: 2006-03-04
Initial package version: groff-1.18.1.1
Description: Fixes a compiler issue when using gcc-4.1
diff -Naur groff-1.18.1.1-o
proposed above, so i might not be too
wrong ;-)
Well, thats my 2 cent. But i'm only a translator and i'm not too deep into all
this stuff.
Bye,
Thomas
--
There are 10 kind of people. Those who understand binary, and those
who don't.
pgpZeC6B2PYpV.pgp
Description: PGP
rom package kdesdk) again for
translating the book. This was nearly impossible in the past because those
tools extracted complete chapters and appendixes into a single, huge msgid.
I hope this brings some translations back to the LFS community :)
Bye,
Thomas
-- Forwarded Mess
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 20:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Currently we have NCPFS-2.2.4 in the book. This package contains
> client and administration tools for use with Novell networks.
>
>...
>
> Due to the lack of interest and the lack of testing capability, I
> propose dropping this package from
this. Google is more useful than a whole new book for a
lot of this. Plus there is no sense duplicating documentation that is
already out there.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 07:26, Nathan Coulson wrote:
>...
>>ntp-stable-4.2.0a-20060224.tar.gz.md5
>...
why not using 4.2.2 ? Is there a technical showstopper?
Thomas
___
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten v
ons.
I took the gcc only for example - I hope you understand what i want to say.
Btw, what i also want to say is that everyone who is involved in the LFS
project does a great job!
It still makes fun to fool around with LFS - now trying the jhalfs (a nice
script!) and other stuff
ook so long
> to get out too.
The gcc was just an example and i'm surely not in the position to do criticism
on the developers. Viewed from outside, it simply was quite silent.
> Thomas, what specific features would you have in this "bleeding edge"
> version of the bo
Hello,
the german translation of LFS 6.2 is now available at the usual ressource:
http://oss.erdfunkstelle.de/lfs-de/
I'm sorry for the delay of 3 weeks, i've been busy with other important
things.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
There are 10 kind of people. Those who understand binary, and
ptop (500MHz-PIII yawn!). On
my server, an installation using -rc5 is up and running (KDE, cdrtools,
sound, Samba, Apache, PostgreSQL, xine, etc.pp...)
Be carefull with the headers_install target. It cleans the destination first
and than installs the headers into. Previously installed hea
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:21, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > Be carefull with the headers_install target. It cleans the destination
> > first and than installs the headers into. Previously installed headers
> > got lost.
>
> Well, there's a p
be explicit rather than implicit though?
Yes, i such situations (say security issue) i'd prefer explicit settings, too.
Thomas
___
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.y
fer the Matthews commands. Furthermore I think
it's simply more save. Imagine one comes to the conclusion (for whichever
reason) to reinstall the headers after having the hole blfs stuff done and
does not use the temporar
ot;linux headers" page?
Basically to exchange the page it ok. Perhaps the unifdef package may added to
chapter 6 since it is required for later "make headers_install" but ok, i
dunno whether that ever would be required to
Hi,
On Thursday 05 October 2006 18:49, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__)
> typedef __signed__ long long __s64;
> typedef unsigned long long __u64;
> #endif
>
Since the __STRICT_ANSI__ define seems to be set I did the following:
diff -Naur kdebase-3.5.2
f spam i
received from bots filling the form tends to zero - no, it *is* zero.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
right? Everywhere
else is ok for my opinion.
Btw, dont be afraid of the ads Google will place the first days. It will
adjusted in a very good way so the ads will relate to the site than.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
tory, short nice-to-have: Please add serial-console-support (if not
builtin yet)
Cheers,
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
parc32, prtconf and eeprom
> silo: the sparc bootloader
This and the four pkgs mentioned in the clfs-project for the PPC we have 6
additional packages which is an increase of round about 10% but on the other
side the field where LFS than is documented and maintaned grows from x86 only
to x86
On Sunday 14 October 2007 18:20, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> ...
> All my spare time is being spent here: http://www.mcmurchy.com/helo/
Hehe, I like the Becks bottle (it is one, isn't it?) on the ladder most... ;-)
> ...
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs
Hi,
i now finished a jhalfs run using the jh branch (Rev. 8405). Everything went
fine up to building the kernel. Even that runs fine but the scripts assume
that the bzImage is in the x86 directories. Thats not true on a PPC.
--
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
is, some installed headers will be lost.
>
> The same goes for the toolchain instructions.
>
> - Reece
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount of
the host's /dev. There could be more that relies on mount, not sure what
though.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount of
the host's /dev. There could be more that relies on mount, not sure what
though.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount of
the host's /dev. There could be more that relies on mount, not sure what
though.
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>> From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
>> inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount
>> of the host&
t situation it's not easy to keep track
of translations and to know which of them are current and which aren't. (Each
translation is hosted on it's own website).
Comments? Ideas?
Cheers
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
http://li
past on #lfs-support (e.g., a translator forgot to remove an
> instruction that tells to apply now-obsolete patch),
I'm curious: Was this with the german translation? I ususally check my
translations twice to avoid such a mess.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally si
On Montag, 31. Dezember 2007, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> 2007/12/31, Thomas Reitelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > However, translated books are not available in the XML format.
> >
> > At least the german one is.
>
> Sorry, indeed, I missed this
> (htt
Hi,
i just finished a full featured lfs/blfs install on my laptop. I upgraded a
few packages in LFS first. For now, everything seems to work fine.
--
Thomas
diff --exclude=.svn -Naur BOOK-8462/packages.ent BOOK/packages.ent
--- BOOK-8462/packages.ent 2008-01-27 15:32:10.943445736 +0100
+++ BOOK
9.
>
> That makes LFS nine years old this month. It still boggles my mind some
> days that LFS grew into what it has.
>
> Ciao!
>
> Gerard
/me opens a bottle of champagne!
Congrats and thanks for leading it to where it is!
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
ix-like monster and i would setup one for a PPC without a
VGA. So, give the people the knowledge on how to create a CD, not the CD.
Of course, it would be nice if there would be one as something like
the "proof of concept".
The above is all nonsense, isn't it?
--
Thomas
--
example:
/path/to/makepkg.sh -d /path/to/destdir pkgname
This will create a pkgname.bin. Executing that pkgname.bin, the files will be
installed in /. You may even add pre- and post-install routines. It assumes
that tar and dd are available on the system.
--
Thomas
makepkg.sh
Descriptio
t. Noone can check it. Keep it offline - everything else
is boring.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
aboot, whatelse).
What do you think about having a a bit closer look to this? A separate section
about choosing the boot-loader? And of course a section about required
packages for a specific arch - if there are one?
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
hi,
> There was an explicit ban from Gerard to not talk about this and you are not
> respecting it then.
Yes, you're right - i saw that too late - sorry for that but I have
no "unsend"-button. I read my mails top-down and answered before reading
Gerards mails.
, Chris, David, Matthew and all the ones I now have forgotten to name.
This was my last noise on the list
If someone wants to reach me - please do...
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
and with a few own patches they do work for LFS.
Please when making such a decision keep translation and common translation
tools in mind. Tools used by me are xmllint, xml2pot, po2xml, msgmerge (for po
files), xsltproc and htmldoc (to create PDFs from html).
That's just my 2 cent.
, i think. I know
Randy from the BLFS project - it cannot be better to have him acting on LFS
too.
Again, congrats to Randy and DJ !
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
If one goes to mistakenly goes to linuxfromscratch.org (rather than
www.linuxfromscratch.org), one gets what appears to be a simplified version of
the LFS home page, but actually is a page of broken links.
I would post to the website maintenance list, but it doesn't appear active
these days.
B
Hi,
in the chapter "About SBUs" there is a link to
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~sbu/ which leads to a "Page not found".
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Am Freitag, 31. Januar 2014, 10:11:35 schrieb Bruce Dubbs:
> Thomas Trepl wrote:
> ...
> > So my question is
> > a) are there (really not enough) people out there who are using ppp to
> > connect to internet so it would make sense to think about a reanimation
> > of
#x27;/srv/tmp/build/glamor-egl/build/glamor-
egl-0.6.0/src'
Makefile:487: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/srv/tmp/build/glamor-egl/build/glamor-egl-0.6.0'
Makefile:393: recipe for target 'all
This might be important for anyone wanting to build pygtk.
It's a patch to pygobject.
https://bug668522.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=209543
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information
Hi,
in chap6 the version of the eudev-manpages is hardcoded
tar -xvf ../eudev-1.5.1-manpages.tar.bz2 -C /usr/share
which should be
tar -xvf ../eudev-&eudev-version;-manpages.tar.bz2 -C /usr/share
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ:
e core. The only
one still missing is cpio. With this one, everything would be available to
setup a Linux system using a initramfs for booting.
Just my 2ct,
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi,
seems so that libcap is missing in "All packages" in chap3.
--
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
them on.
All in all, compiling for 486 is save, for sure, and will run on nearly all
machines today.
Performance isnt an argument for other settings cause running from cd will
allways be a bit slower than from hard disc.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-d
"Shadow fails to update the time of last login as noted by lastlog when logging into a regular console. The Port (tty) column does get
updated."
Is the last sentence correct? Or should it be the negation "The Port (tty)
column does _not_ get updated."?
*wonder
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
>
>
> Well it sounds like we'll have a good number of testers for the x86_64
> arch then :)
>
You can add me to the list of x86_64 testers. :)
--
Thomas
LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329
kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.9-1.667
08:22:44 up 3 d
irectories.
This would be the way I think it ought to be done as well, having tried
to tackle a multilib build a while back things work much better that way.
--
Thomas
LFS User : 4729 / Linux User : 298329
kitt - Powered by: Linux 2.6.9-1.667
08:22:44 up 3 days, 22:05, 2 users, load average
s blocking the release?
Maybe there is a good reason, so i thought i could simply ask... ;-)
Bye,
Thomas
pgp4D4mY3ldxb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
location is no longer valid or the server has been
misconfigured :(
can someone please have a look at it?
thanks,
thomas reitelbach
pgpthDOLK2DSL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See
Hello list,
i have just submitted an update for LFS on the freshmeat website.
Hopefully it will reflect our current stable 6.1 soon.
bye,
thomas
pgpWxfst929vL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 12:51, Archaic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:38:59AM +0000, Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> > either the download location is no longer valid or the server has been
> > misconfigured :(
>
> ftp ftp.linuxfromscratch.org
> Connected to ftp.linuxfromsc
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
