On Wednesday 11 December 2013 23:52:45 Armin K. wrote:
> For those that don't know, you can read systemd version of the book
> online at [1].
>
> Please note that I've just applied systemd specific changes to lfs
> development book which was the most current at the time, but didn't yet
> run any t
Em 11-12-2013 20:14, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> On 12/11/2013 11:33 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Those of you who follow lfs-book will have seen some commits fly by from
>>> Armin, who asked to be granted access to work on the systemd branch. As
>>> I've been lacking
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 11:33 PM, Matt Burgess wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Those of you who follow lfs-book will have seen some commits fly by from
>> Armin, who asked to be granted access to work on the systemd branch. As
>> I've been lacking time recently, a
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Matt Burgess
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 15:30 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Is it useful to update using all of this? The last four elements are
>> not strictly needed for LFS. We could approach this in other ways
>> though. We could create a custom Makefil
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, John Burrell wrote:
>>> Now I need to build binutils and make sure that it sees the correct
>>> toolchain -
>>
>> You have it backwards. Binutils, then gcc, then glibc. Not glibc,
>> then binutils.
>>
>> What exactly are you going after.
>
> It's an experiment. I w
