On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Matt Burgess <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 15:30 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Is it useful to update using all of this? The last four elements are >> not strictly needed for LFS. We could approach this in other ways >> though. We could create a custom Makefile or a patch for everything. >> >> What do you think? > > Nice work. I'd personally prefer a patch for this. As useful as the > various sed expressions are for educational purposes, the command as a > whole looks a little unwieldy. > > Cheers, > > Matt.
A thought I was having about systemd vs sysvinit. If the books are being developed in parallel, we should probably try to use the same programs in each. ex:/ if we use pidof in procps-ng we should also use the pidof from procps in systemd. (The above is using the pidof from procps, but seemed like a good example to use). -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) ------ Location: British Columbia, Canada Timezone: PST (-8) Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
