Em 11-12-2013 20:14, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 12/11/2013 11:33 PM, Matt Burgess wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Those of you who follow lfs-book will have seen some commits fly by from >>> Armin, who asked to be granted access to work on the systemd branch. As >>> I've been lacking time recently, and lost a bit of motivation for >>> maintaining the branch myself, I was happy to accept the offer of help. >>> >>> Welcome back to the editing team, Armin! > > I'm glad you decide to come back also. >
It is very good to have you back. >> Thanks. >> >> For those that don't know, you can read systemd version of the book >> online at [1]. >> >> Please note that I've just applied systemd specific changes to lfs >> development book which was the most current at the time, but didn't yet >> run any test build. I hope to do one during the weekend though. >> >> That said, current build instructions might or might not work correctly. >> Any feedback or help is welcome, being it a typo fix, instructions fix >> or even instructions addition. Just send a message to this mailing list >> or create ticket in lfs trac. >> >> LFS systemd branch will continue to share most of the packages with lfs >> development version and the ones not available in lfs with blfs svn >> version of the book. I'll try and make sure that differences between lfs >> non-systemd and systemd branches are minimal when it comes to shared stuff. >> >> Note that systemd version is currently missing a page which installs and >> describes lfs network scripts package, which is entirely systemd >> specific, although it uses same networking scripts as lfs does. There's >> a ticket already for that one and I hope I'll get to it soon enough. >> >> Given that everything goes well, I was hoping that we can release LFS >> systemd book along with the next stable LFS book. It's too early now to >> speak about that though :D > > We plan on the next LFS version on March 1st with a package freeze > probably around mid-February. > >> There won't be any BLFS book which follows lfs systemd book, at least >> not maintained by me. Project is big enough that it's too hard for me >> alone to maintain it. I might, however, create some (not strictly a >> book) instructions on how to modify some blfs packages to utilize >> systemd correctly. I do not promise anything yet. > > I suggest that we might want to add a 'Systemd Issues' or similar name > to BLFS packages that need them. If the Gnome desktop is restored, then > I suspect that the intro to the section would mention systemd and apply > to the entire section. > Again, I am not a Gnome user, but there are some of their applications I like very much. I would like very much to have the Gnome desktop back and would be glad to maintain it. Agree with Bruce's suggestion. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
