Hi,
I'm building HLFS and even though I'm not sure, I think there's a bug
in zlib install.
I get errors when trying to build module-init-tools 3.1 with zlib
support: ( I know I should put whole listing but I've booted from LFS
livecd and don't have clipboard... )
/us
On February 21, 2005 05:45 am, Steve Crosby wrote:
> Also, what's the recommended method of obtaining disk usage stats? total
> installed size, including sources? I'm building the full LFS system most
The book lists the disk space used after installation including the
not-yet-removed source tree.
Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> commit. It might take a day or two before there might be time again.
> I'd rather get the package in without updating sizes, SBUs, and
> descriptions, than wait longer to get the update.
>
For what it's worth, here are
90% of the time it doesn't change, but your are right in the instances
it does, we should take care of it.
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
I won't dispute what you said. You laid out what the right thing is to do. It
doesn't always get done unfortunately. It's one of those things I mean to
change soon. I include myself in that because often I too am a little low on
time. It takes a few seconds to update a package's version entity,
[This will be my last post on this subject. I've expressed an
opinion, not to disparage, but to encourage technical excellence.
I'll reiterate some points in this post and leave it at that.]
Jeremy Utley wrote these words on 02/20/05 19:37 CST:
> This, IMHO, is a highly optimistic view. For each
Randy McMurchy wrote:
What do you mean a bother? For almost all the packages in the
book that build in just a minute or two, it would take less
than 5 minutes to update the build entities, installed programs
and libraries in the book.
This, IMHO, is a highly optimistic view. For each upgrade,
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/20/05 18:34 CST:
> On February 20, 2005 03:17 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>>Libol and syslog-ng don't have any program descriptions, lists,
>>diskspace used, dependencies or build times. Others that I don't
>>remember off-hand need fixing in these areas as w
On February 20, 2005 03:17 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Libol and syslog-ng don't have any program descriptions, lists,
> diskspace used, dependencies or build times. Others that I don't
> remember off-hand need fixing in these areas as well.
It's a common thing to happen. Packages are added or upg
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 02/20/05 16:04 CST:
> On February 20, 2005 02:53 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
>>The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
>>not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
>>case someone wants to update the book.
>
> What
On February 20, 2005 02:53 pm, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
> not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
> case someone wants to update the book.
What's missing?
--
Gerard Beekmans
/* If Linux doesn't have the solu
The list of installed programs for the subject-labeled package is
not accurate for the version in SVN. This is just a heads-up in
case someone wants to update the book.
--
Randy
rmlinux: [GNU ld version 2.15.91.0.2 20040727] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.1]
[GNU C Library 2004-07-01 release version 2.3.4] [Lin
12 matches
Mail list logo
