Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.3 ISO discussion

2013-03-22 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "cybertao" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 20 Mars 2013 22:45:24 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.3 ISO discussion > > > > So, what's up with the linux kernel and overlayed filesystems? > There's no support. That should be solved on 3.10 kern

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.3: ISO discussion

2013-03-13 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "cybertao" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 13 Mars 2013 07:39:25 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.3: ISO discussion > > > I elected to use 'Os' optimisations on my current compilation round. > I understand it to be safe option and can only assu

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS v7.3-rc1 and gcc tests

2013-02-21 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Armin K." > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Jeudi 21 Février 2013 17:18:34 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS v7.3-rc1 and gcc tests > > On 02/21/2013 05:46 AM, arad...@juno.com wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I have built v7.3-rc1 and am posting mostly t

Re: [lfs-dev] procps-ng install headers to /include/proc/ instead of /usr/include/proc/

2013-01-27 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Vendredi 25 Janvier 2013 17:55:21 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] procps-ng install headers to /include/proc/ instead of > /usr/include/proc/ > > Armin K. wrote: > > On 01/25/2013 12:19 PM, xinglp wrote: > >> Is

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN current build results

2012-12-29 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Matt Burgess" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 29 Décembre 2012 22:39:38 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN current build results > ... > > > I also got a failure in the coreutils test suite: > > FAIL: test-getlogin > > === > > te

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results

2012-12-27 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Vendredi 28 Décembre 2012 01:03:32 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results > > Pierre Labastie wrote: > > Le 25/12/2012 00:41, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > >> > >> I'm not quite ready to give up on

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results

2012-12-24 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "g esp" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Lundi 24 Décembre 2012 18:12:00 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results ... > > The umount process at the end did not work properly. > > There may al

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results

2012-12-24 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Lundi 24 Décembre 2012 17:23:13 > Objet: [lfs-dev] LFS SVN urrent build results > > I ran a new build test last night and had some issues. Just > reporting > right now. > Numbers refer to jhalfs order. >

Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement

2012-12-17 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Kevin Lyda" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Lundi 17 Décembre 2012 09:44:00 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > There are a few issues here. First, they are not releasing

Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement

2012-12-16 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Lundi 17 Décembre 2012 04:09:40 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] eudev project announcement > > Nathan Coulson wrote: > > Looks like Gentoo have announced their udev fork, eudev > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gman

Re: [lfs-dev] BLFS & Freetype patents

2012-11-30 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Wolf" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Novembre 2012 23:29:03 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] BLFS & Freetype patents > > On 11/30/2012 4:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > Wolf wrote: > >> Is the sed command in BLFS still necessary for subpixel rende

Re: [lfs-dev] RFC Combining /usr with root directories

2012-10-03 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 3 Octobre 2012 01:42:40 > Objet: [lfs-dev] RFC Combining /usr with root directories > ... > As far as I can tell, everything should work as before, but we can > remove some of the things we do to

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Armin K." > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 8 Septembre 2012 19:23:05 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill > ... > > > > http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/kill1-consolidation > > > > Maybe some procps kill option wi

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 8 Septembre 2012 17:34:49 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill > > Marty Jack wrote: > > Being provided by procps and util-linux. I have --disable-kill on > > util-linux.

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-04 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Firerat" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 4 Septembre 2012 09:42:01 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su ... > > > > > > It has been too long since I last played around with it, but > > > looking > > > at my scripts I > > > > > > ln -sv

Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su

2012-09-03 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Firerat" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 4 Septembre 2012 07:14:34 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] campaign to save su ... > > It has been too long since I last played around with it, but looking > at my scripts I > > ln -sv su-tools /tools/bin/su >

[lfs-dev] lfs-7.2-rc numerous typo

2012-08-29 Thread g . esp
misspelling-1.5 program find numerous typo in lfs-book tree I used find /tmp/lfs-book -print | misspellings -f - and find that list that doesn't look wrong to my inaccurate french eyes. /tmp/lfs-book/stylesheets/lfs-xsl/pdf/lfs-lists.xsl:38: necesary -> "necessary" /tmp/lfs-book/stylesheets/lfs-x

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc tzdata

2012-08-29 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Août 2012 17:56:20 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] glibc tzdata > > > > and a last remark: > > > > we should explain why to use America/New_York and not the builders > > current timezone! in Makeconfi

Re: [lfs-dev] tzdata

2012-08-17 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Ken Moffat" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 18 Août 2012 05:08:05 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] tzdata > .. > > sed : I've got to revisit this, my results don't make sense. The > tests use the ru_RU.UTF-8 setting to test manipulations of 'да д' >

Re: [lfs-dev] tzdata

2012-08-17 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Ken Moffat" > À: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 17 Août 2012 18:06:34 > Objet: [lfs-dev] tzdata > > On support, Markku Pesonen pointed out that up to glibc-2.15 the > tzdata was installed in both /usr/share/zoneinfo{,/posix} for data > without l

Re: [lfs-dev] 5.17. Coreutils-8.18 "cp -v src/su /tools/bin No such file or directory"

2012-08-16 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - De: "xinglp" À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" Envoyé: Jeudi 16 Août 2012 09:38:38 Objet: [lfs-dev] 5.17. Coreutils-8.18 "cp -v src/su /tools/bin No such file or directory" The reason is su move from coreutils to utils-linux. That would not be an issue once utils-linu

Re: [lfs-dev] kbd resizecons was still build on 32-bit x86

2012-06-07 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Ken Moffat" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Juin 2012 01:27:34 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] kbd resizecons was still build on 32-bit x86 > > > 2. How did you decide on that date and time ? In a just untarred > kbd tree, with configure touched to

Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?

2012-06-06 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Matt Burgess" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 08:58:30 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book? > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 08:07 +0200, g@free.fr wrote: > > > Except I say there is more perl scripts as I reported only the on

Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?

2012-06-05 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Steve Crosby" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Cc: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Juin 2012 03:53:43 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book? > > The discussion is about the feasibility of removing perl from *LFS* - > all of the packages

Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?

2012-06-05 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Jeremy Huntwork" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 5 Juin 2012 16:09:51 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book? > > On 6/5/12 2:05 AM, g@free.fr wrote: > > This make me smile a lot. > > There is much more dependencies in perl than just glib

Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book?

2012-06-04 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Jeremy Huntwork" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 5 Juin 2012 01:54:01 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] popt in the book? > > On 6/4/12 7:52 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: > > So maybe it should just be installed in Chapter 5 and the Chapter 6 > > page could m

Re: [lfs-dev] libgmp.so versions in LFS 6.6, 6.7 - can this be right?

2012-06-03 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Jeremy Henty" > À: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Envoyé: Dimanche 3 Juin 2012 13:22:33 > Objet: [lfs-dev] libgmp.so versions in LFS 6.6, 6.7 - can this be right? > > > Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that: > >LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0): >

Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion

2012-05-09 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Jeremy Huntwork" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mercredi 9 Mai 2012 22:19:27 > Objet: [lfs-dev] Suggestion > > Greetings all, > > Consider two things: > > 1. We all hate long build times. Anything we can (reasonably and > accurately do) to speed

Re: [lfs-dev] Build method revisions

2012-03-20 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Pierre Labastie" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 20 Mars 2012 22:26:32 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] Build method revisions > > - Gunzip all the .gz files (gzip puts a time stamp) Would not using something like export GZIP='-n' solve the include tim

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc timezone/zoneinfo

2012-03-13 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Andrew Benton" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Mardi 13 Mars 2012 14:10:54 > Objet: [lfs-dev] glibc timezone/zoneinfo > > Hello > > FYI, it seems that timezone/zoneinfo data are no longer installed by > glibc (from git). It still installs zic, and

Re: [lfs-dev] m4 test error

2012-03-09 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Qrux" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Mars 2012 14:53:02 > Objet: [lfs-dev] m4 test error > > Howdy. > > In trying to build LFS-7.0 with LFS-7.0, I'm getting this error: > > FAIL: test-readlink (exit: 134) >