----- Mail original ----- > De: "Jeremy Henty" <onepo...@starurchin.org> > À: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org > Envoyé: Dimanche 3 Juin 2012 13:22:33 > Objet: [lfs-dev] libgmp.so versions in LFS 6.6, 6.7 - can this be right? > > > Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that: > > LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0): > libgmp.a > libgmp.la > libgmp.so > libgmp.so.3 > libgmp.so.3.6.0 > > LFS 6.7 (gmp-5.0.1): > libgmp.a > libgmp.la > libgmp.so > libgmp.so.10 > libgmp.so.10.0.1 > > I am rather amazed that changing the GMP version from 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 > should change the version number of the *.so from 3 to 10! Is > something broken here? > No, I have libgmp.so.3.5.0 for gmp-4.3.1 so libgmp.so.3.6.0 doesn't look unlogical for gmp-5.0.0 .so name.
This is half described in http://gmplib.org:8000/gmp-5.0/file/702aa1847945/Makefile.am but -version-info is not the same as gmp.so file name. The .la file contain both the library name and current,age and revision. libtool take care to calculate the so name and I didn't look how that is made. For gmp-5.0.x , the last number is the same in the package name and in the libgmp.so.10.0 name, so 5.0.5 give libgmp.so.10.0.5 Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
