Here in Spain (at least) charital actions can aleviate the natural weight of
taxes.
What I mean is... if the LFS Foundation could serve a purpose for the
community, but
with a more wider perspective, maybe in your area that could count as a
basis for not
having to pay all the applicable taxes,
> In another email I mentioned Wikipedia as an example, but I don't
> necessarily think LFS needs to go to that level of open editing. Really,
> what I had in mind was simply making the editing tasks simpler and
> easier to attack, so that when it comes time to do the work of adding
> content to th
> I wanted to wait a bit before commenting to see if anyone else would
> comment first. But perhaps the lack of comments is in part because
> people feel it has all been said already? Maybe it is time that we just
> pick a general direction based on the comments we've already received
> and start m
Jeremy,
I like your idea, having customised instructions in PHP for everyone's need
is great.
I've been giving this subject a long thought since the first post, and I
would like to make a suggestion, although I don't particularly know if it
will be useful, but here it is:
What I've thought is
Hi,
In the glibc installation step in section 6.9, we say the following:
[quote]
The glibc-libidn tarball adds support for internationalized domain names (IDN)
to Glibc. Many programs that support IDN require the full libidn library, not
this add-on (see
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/vi
Hi Jeremy,
I'm not sure if my opinion would count as I'm not a formal developer of LFS,
more of an user trying to track some new packages and trying to inform if
there's any anomaly in some of them, but, well... here goes my two cents:
LiveCD or not LiveCD? LiveCD without any need of thinking a
On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:54 -0500, Joe Ciccone wrote:
> Julio Meca Hansen wrote:
> > As the wiki states, either e2fsprogs or udev needs to be installed in
> > chapter 5 if we're going to include the util-linux-ng package.
> >
> > After analysing the matter a
As the wiki states, either e2fsprogs or udev needs to be installed in
chapter 5 if we're going to include the util-linux-ng package.
After analysing the matter a bit, I've been testing with the
installation of e2fsprogs in chapter 5, this set of commands:
mkdir -v build
cd build
../configure --p
> A quick check of Binutils sources suggests that is correct. Could you
> try the attached patch please, and confirm if it works with
> Texinfo-4.11?
Sure, I'll perform a quick reconstruction of the test partition and let
you know how well (or bad) it goes...
Regards,
Julio
PS. Sorry if the mes
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 14:53 -0700, Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:47:12 +0100, Julio Meca Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The last information that can be extracted from the LFS Trac for ticket
> > #2074 (texinfo-4.11) stated that we had to wait
The last information that can be extracted from the LFS Trac for ticket
#2074 (texinfo-4.11) stated that we had to wait until gcc-4.2.2 was out,
now gcc is out and in fact used in the development branch of the book,
is it ready for inclusion?
I can't mention the CLFS patches for both binutils/texi
I know that's not absolutely specific to LFS, but more to CLFS (as they
have the updates in their SVN repo), but...
There's some updates for the toolchain components, that's binutils,
glibc and gcc. Listed here are the links to that patches:
http://svn.cross-lfs.org/svn/repos/patches/binutils/bin
12 matches
Mail list logo
