> In another email I mentioned Wikipedia as an example, but I don't > necessarily think LFS needs to go to that level of open editing. Really, > what I had in mind was simply making the editing tasks simpler and > easier to attack, so that when it comes time to do the work of adding > content to the book that it is less of a chore.
What I was thinking was some kinf of (strange, I have to admit) mixture between Wikipedia and git, where we could be adding some new instructions for the book, among text, clarifications, notes, but that changes not being added inmediately, but more like... having that change being stored in kind of a temporary submit to be reviewed, or using kind of a submit buffer, just in case a certain addition breaks the process and we can revert it to its previous state (although it's a level of complexity that I don't know if we can take right now) > If we can at the same time find some way of encouraging non-editors to > submit content for review, I think we'd be on the right path. I think it's a very nice step to take into account, at least the 'implementation' part of the process would go quite fast (having to revert and trace errors would be a different matter, tough...) Julio -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page