Re: [lfs-dev] Generation of the book in French

2012-09-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > Le samedi 08 septembre 2012 à 16:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >> Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: >> >> I can add the patch for l10n, but the paper size would change it for >> everybody. A4 is narrower and would result in many instances of line >> overflow. We genera

Re: [lfs-dev] Generation of the book in French

2012-09-08 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Le samedi 08 septembre 2012 à 16:37 -0500, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > > I can add the patch for l10n, but the paper size would change it for > everybody. A4 is narrower and would result in many instances of line > overflow. We generally have to check each release an

Re: [lfs-dev] Generation of the book in French

2012-09-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Jean-Philippe MENGUAL wrote: > With attached file, it's better. It's only 1500 bytes. Much better as ascii files and not a tarball. >> Thanks a new French contributer, we studied more in details why make >> displayed some errors due to the translation, such as "No french for >> "description"", e

Re: [lfs-dev] Generation of the book in French

2012-09-08 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
With attached file, it's better. - Jean-Philippe MENGUAL Président de l'association traduc.org Coordinateur du projet Linux From Scratch Coordinateur au sein du projet Trad GNU de l'April Animateur suppléant du groupe de travail Accessibilité de l'April Le

[lfs-dev] Generation of the book in French

2012-09-08 Thread Jean-Philippe MENGUAL
Hi, Thanks a new French contributer, we studied more in details why make displayed some errors due to the translation, such as "No french for "description"", etc etc. This errors are fixed in the attached patch, named adn_lfs-l10n_french_loc.patch. The second patch, I'm not sure you'll be interes

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Armin K." > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 8 Septembre 2012 19:23:05 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill > ... > > > > http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/kill1-consolidation > > > > Maybe some procps kill option wi

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread Armin K.
On 08.09.2012 18:23, g@free.fr wrote: > There was a request from util-linux to consolidate kill on the util-linux > side. > So it may disappear from procps in the futur, but this is not made actually, > I checked the tree today. > > http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/kill1-consolidation > >

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread g . esp
- Mail original - > De: "Bruce Dubbs" > À: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" > Envoyé: Samedi 8 Septembre 2012 17:34:49 > Objet: Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill > > Marty Jack wrote: > > Being provided by procps and util-linux. I have --disable-kill on > > util-linux.

Re: [lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Marty Jack wrote: > Being provided by procps and util-linux. I have --disable-kill on util-linux. Well, procps is after util-linux and will overwrite the version from util-linux, but is there a reason to prefer one over the other? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/

[lfs-dev] More fallout from util-linux 2.22: kill

2012-09-08 Thread Marty Jack
Being provided by procps and util-linux. I have --disable-kill on util-linux. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page