On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:59:27AM +0200, Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 02:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
> > make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
> > to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) wh
On 06/04/2012 02:44 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
> make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
> to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) when run as root,
> but people using package management might need t
Just had an intersting issue testing this for BLFS: as a user,
make DESTDIR install fails, unable to update the aclocal dir. Seems
to do the right thing (i.e. update the DESTDIR) when run as root,
but people using package management might need to know this.
ĸen
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, da
> pam (pam_systemd.la)
>>
>> since each of them has a --disable-X flag too.
>
> Just a note. I'm doing my checks in a Chapter 6 (SVN-20120603) type
> environment. There is no hint of tcpwrappers, pam, etc.. Those other
> things that can be specified seem to be chec
too.
Just a note. I'm doing my checks in a Chapter 6 (SVN-20120603) type
environment. There is no hint of tcpwrappers, pam, etc.. Those other
things that can be specified seem to be checked and automatically set as
not available.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listin
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I grabbed the current git version of Makefile.am and applied the patch
> with no errors. autoreconf also works without error.
>
> ./configure --disable-systemd --with-usb-ids-path=no \
> --with-pci-ids-path=no
>
> ...
>
> configure: error: Package requirements
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>> On 06/03/2012 02:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Bryan, I tried the patch you submitted to linux-hotplug yesterday:
>>>
>>> systemd-make-systemd-optional.patch
>>>
>>> It doesn't apply cleanly to either systemd-183 or -184.
>> It applies with offsets to git m
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 06/03/2012 02:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Bryan, I tried the patch you submitted to linux-hotplug yesterday:
>>
>> systemd-make-systemd-optional.patch
>>
>> It doesn't apply cleanly to either systemd-183 or -184.
>
> It applies with offsets to git master...which hopefully s
On 06/03/2012 02:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan, I tried the patch you submitted to linux-hotplug yesterday:
>
> systemd-make-systemd-optional.patch
>
> It doesn't apply cleanly to either systemd-183 or -184.
>
>
It applies with offsets to git master...which hopefully soon will be -185.
git://a
Bryan, I tried the patch you submitted to linux-hotplug yesterday:
systemd-make-systemd-optional.patch
It doesn't apply cleanly to either systemd-183 or -184.
-- Bruce
patching file Makefile.am
Hunk #1 succeeded at 201 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 448 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 su
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> So, unfortunately, they should have bumped 5.0.0's solib number but
> didn't, which is why you're seeing a problem now. Given that you
> can successfully run Haskell against 5.0.0, would creating
> compatibility symlinks of libgmp.so.3 -> libgmp.so.10
- Mail original -
> De: "Jeremy Henty"
> À: lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 3 Juin 2012 13:22:33
> Objet: [lfs-dev] libgmp.so versions in LFS 6.6, 6.7 - can this be right?
>
>
> Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that:
>
>LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0):
>
On Sun, 2012-06-03 at 12:22 +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that:
>
>LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0):
> libgmp.a
> libgmp.la
> libgmp.so
> libgmp.so.3
> libgmp.so.3.6.0
>
>LFS 6.7 (gmp-5.0.1):
> libgmp.a
>
Le 02/06/2012 18:00, Jeremy Huntwork a écrit :
> I'm going to start by jumping on the parser, since it will be
> necessary right away for any of this to work. My initial thoughts are
> to build one parser that can accept different output filters, for
> example, outputting to PKGBUILD files, or r
Comparing my old LFS 6.6 with my new LFS 6.7 I see that:
LFS 6.6 (gmp-5.0.0):
libgmp.a
libgmp.la
libgmp.so
libgmp.so.3
libgmp.so.3.6.0
LFS 6.7 (gmp-5.0.1):
libgmp.a
libgmp.la
libgmp.so
libgmp.so.10
libgmp.so.10
Le 03/06/2012 06:22, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> I originally had filename="pkgconfig.html" and jhalfs couldn't file the
> package and didn't give a warning or error. It just failed when the
> build got to that point. In this case, after several hours. :(
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
BTW,
Once the correct
Le 03/06/2012 06:22, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> This is mostly for Matt, but others may take note.
>
> I was adding new pages to LFS and had a hard time getting pkg-config to
> be recognized by jhalfs. What I found out was that the xml code:
>
>
>
> and the file name
>
> pkg-config-0.26-inte
17 matches
Mail list logo
