Re: [lfs-dev] Patch naming

2012-01-11 Thread Steve Crosby
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: >> >> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name >> dash patchrev3.patch >> >>

Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:43:12PM +, Matt Burgess wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 02:22 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me, > > NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going > > to happen: > > > > in LFS - nothi

Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-11 Thread Matt Burgess
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 02:22 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > For those who saw me moaning on lfs-book about libnl-2.0 (for me, > NetworkManager doesn't build against it), a summary of what is going > to happen: > > in LFS - nothing! Matt spotted that iproute2 only uses the > headers, it doesn't link a

Re: [lfs-dev] Grub setup issues

2012-01-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Bob Davison wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for a great book. I have just set up my first LFS; I had great > fun and all is fine. > > I hit a couple of issues setting up Grub that, looking through the > lfs-support archive, have bitten a few others and wondered if it is > worth mentioning in the book. >

[lfs-dev] Grub setup issues

2012-01-11 Thread Bob Davison
Hi, Thanks for a great book. I have just set up my first LFS; I had great fun and all is fine. I hit a couple of issues setting up Grub that, looking through the lfs-support archive, have bitten a few others and wondered if it is worth mentioning in the book. I used SVN-20120106 and although th

Re: [lfs-dev] Patch naming

2012-01-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Andrew Benton wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: >> >> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name >> dash patchrev3.patch >> >> That is, the name should be: >>

Re: [blfs-dev] anomaly in firefox section

2012-01-11 Thread Andrew Benton
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:07:42 -0600 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Be careful. There are a lot of packages that need libpng. At least > qt3, firefox, seamonkey, thunderbird, and gimp have patches for libpng-1.5. > > Since it's only a point release, they are probably OK, but they should > be checked. I

Re: [lfs-dev] Patch naming

2012-01-11 Thread Andrew Benton
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: > > pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name > dash patchrev3.patch > > That is, the name should be: > > thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-

Re: [lfs-dev] libnl and iproute2

2012-01-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
Markku Pesonen wrote >iproute2 doesn't even use the headers. See this commit in upstream: >http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/shemminger/iproute2.git;a=commit;h=13603f6a9e46f08576f6284a0ef1ce1fbf94ffe0 Nice! I'll try a libnl-less build tonight with relevant seds to prevent iproute2 from