On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Benton <b3n...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: >> >> pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name >> dash patchrev3.patch >> >> That is, the name should be: >> >> thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-1.patch >> >> not >> >> thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng-1.5-1.patch >> > > I don't agree with this. The patch is to fix thunderbird with > libpng-1.5, not libpng_1.5. It's not called libpng_1.5 so why should > the patch be called libpng_1.5? > > Andy
thunderbird-9.0.1-fix_for_libpng-1.5-1.patch? -- -- - Steve Crosby -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
