On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:23:59 -0600 Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a reminder that we did at one time adopt a patch naming convention: > > pkgname dash version dash short underscore descriptive underscore name > dash patchrev3.patch > > That is, the name should be: > > thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng_1.5-1.patch > > not > > thunderbird-9.0.1-libpng-1.5-1.patch > I don't agree with this. The patch is to fix thunderbird with libpng-1.5, not libpng_1.5. It's not called libpng_1.5 so why should the patch be called libpng_1.5? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
