On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:39:05 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> (Bruce, give my warm regards to Austin - a fine city that I have
>> enjoyed on a number of occasions, mind you, I also like Dallas,
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2057#comment:25
>
> And after reading it, hopefully everyone will:
>
> 1. agree with it or
> 2. provide a better solution
Thanks for the ping on this Randy. I'm answering this here on lfs-dev rather
than than within the ticke
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Gerard Beekmans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan, you have done a lot of work with RPM spec files for LFS. Is there
> anything you wish to add to what Alexander said back then and your own
> reply to it?
Alexander may have said this, but one thing to keep in mind
LFS Trac wrote these words on 05/19/08 20:00 CST:
>
> Comment (by Bryan Kadzban):
>
> Since upstream has already written a set of rules that will work for all
> these cases already, I'd like to simply use them. :-)
>
I am all for this in all cases where LFS has/is going to/thinking about
devia
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> Do you want me to start on adding this to the book as Appendix D?
>
> Can I see a finished renderring not quite part of SVN yet.
OK, take a look at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/lfs-book/
I did not change the version number, so it still says SVN-20080423, but
TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> TheOldFellow wrote:
>>> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that
>>> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation?
>
>
> My thanks to Jaqui and Bruce for the info - very diff
On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:00 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> TheOldFellow wrote:
>> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that
>> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation?
My thanks to Jaqui and Bruce for the info - very different from the UK
situation. It
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I don't enter these types of discussions any longer for the simple
> reason that it has become too difficult (for me, anyway) to argue
> against another idea (or provide countering suggestions).
Randy,
I hope you will reconsider. IMO, your ideas and opinions are valua
TheOldFellow wrote:
> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that
> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? I think some of us
> Non-NA peeps could do with an understanding of that it means, and IANAL!
> I presume it cheaper than a Delaware Corporation
Here in Spain (at least) charital actions can aleviate the natural weight of
taxes.
What I mean is... if the LFS Foundation could serve a purpose for the
community, but
with a more wider perspective, maybe in your area that could count as a
basis for not
having to pay all the applicable taxes,
> In another email I mentioned Wikipedia as an example, but I don't
> necessarily think LFS needs to go to that level of open editing. Really,
> what I had in mind was simply making the editing tasks simpler and
> easier to attack, so that when it comes time to do the work of adding
> content to th
on Monday, May 19, 2008 at 9:46 Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
" What's even more important for educational purposes, Debian rules are
incoherent
" between various Debian packages.
As one of those being educated by all of this (in more ways than you can
possibly imagine, a genuine and heartfel
> F.W.I.W. A Not-For Profit cost here in BC comes to around $500.
> I have been a member of a couple of them, founding member of one.
>
>
The costs are similar here in Alberta from the sounds of it. An Alberta
registered numbered company is relatively cheap. The annual renewal fee
is in the o
Alan,
> Here is the original text from 29/02/08:
>
I remember this post from before. It's quite a change you propose there.
I have to admit, at first glance I'm not sure about the idea yet. But I
am not going to dismiss it either. Please give me some time to think
about this some more and
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 05/18/08 14:36 CST:
> I wanted to wait a bit before commenting to see if anyone else would
> comment first. But perhaps the lack of comments is in part because
> people feel it has all been said already?
>
> [snip proposal]
I don't enter these types of discu
J. Greenlees wrote:
>>
>> One could always use Eclipse with the subclipse plugin. Works a treat
>> for me.
>>
>> Al
>>
>>
> ~shudder~
> last time I installed support for Java [ Sun's jre-1.6 ] I physically
> noticed an increase in time for loading any application, even non Java apps.
> and ecl
Alan Lord wrote:
> J. Greenlees wrote:
>
>> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>>
>>> Rather than re-invent the wheel, would a program like BlueFish be a
>>> possible candidate? I haven't used this program in over half a decade
>>> but I hear it supports XML. It may be a possible alternative to at le
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Take a look at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wiki/LFSFuture
>
> Looking forward to reading you guys' comments.
>
> Gerard
>
F.W.I.W. A Not-For Profit cost here in BC comes to around $500.
I have been a member of a couple of them, founding member of on
J. Greenlees wrote:
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>> Rather than re-invent the wheel, would a program like BlueFish be a
>> possible candidate? I haven't used this program in over half a decade
>> but I hear it supports XML. It may be a possible alternative to at least
>> look into before deciding on
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> Rather than re-invent the wheel, would a program like BlueFish be a
> possible candidate? I haven't used this program in over half a decade
> but I hear it supports XML. It may be a possible alternative to at least
> look into before deciding on a custom "in-house" appli
TheOldFellow wrote:
> Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that
> explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? I think some of us
> Non-NA peeps could do with an understanding of that it means, and IANAL!
> I presume it cheaper than a Delaware Corporation
Could some kind American or Canadian soul post a link to something that
explains this concept as it applies to a corporation? I think some of us
Non-NA peeps could do with an understanding of that it means, and IANAL!
I presume it cheaper than a Delaware Corporation :-)
For what little it's w
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>
>> Take a look at http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/wiki/LFSFuture
>
> In some cases, the changes proposed only require general agreement of what to
> do
> and the accomplishment of the task would be relatively easy. In others, the
> changes wo
Here's a few further comments "for the record".
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> 2. Package management and automation
>
> This is one of two difficult areas to address. How to present PM and how to
> integrate it into the book will take a lot of time to reach consensus on the
> approach to take.
24 matches
Mail list logo
