Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-07-04 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 4 July 2016 at 09:51, First Last wrote: > Could you please add git commit information to openwrt_release file? and why > not change the file name to lede_release? How is this related to LuCI in snapshots? Because some software looks for openwrt_release (e.g. procd). -- Rafał __

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-07-03 Thread Daniel Curran-Dickinson
On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:43 -0700, David Lang wrote: > I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that > can't fit  > luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that > people are  > pointed at. > > Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea,

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-30 Thread John Crispin
On 29/06/2016 16:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > Hi, > > it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it > would give more testing exposure to the ui... > > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building > from sou

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 29 June 2016 at 16:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building > from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend > to be unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, t

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread Aaron Z
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:43 PM, David Lang wrote: > I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that can't fit > luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that people > are pointed at. > Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if for

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread David Lang
54 a.m. To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui in

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant
On 29/06/16 15:54, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread L. D. Pinney
oles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m. > To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images > > Hi, > > it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would > give more testing exposure to the ui... > > My observ

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread Adrian Panella
] adding luci to snapshot images Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those

Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

2016-06-29 Thread Jo-Philipp Wich
Hi, it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would give more testing exposure to the ui... My observation on the matter is this: People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui te