While I think adding luci will be convenient for many users. I feel that the initial release is the paramount issue and that builds containing luci could be added later.
A nice solution would be to offer downloads built w/wo luci....as well as adding 'luci' to the filename if built with luci. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adrian Panella <ianch...@outlook.com> wrote: > Totally agree with the observation. > +1 for including LuCI as default. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of > Jo-Philipp Wich > Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m. > To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images > > Hi, > > it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would > give more testing exposure to the ui... > > My observation on the matter is this: > People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from > source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be > unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...) > > So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await > further feedback on it. > > ~ Jo > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
