On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:43 -0700, David Lang wrote: > I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that > can't fit > luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that > people are > pointed at. > > Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if > forced to > choose, I would say they should have luci >
Agree. As Jo observes those not needing LuCI are generally more capable of building their own images without LuCi than people for whom LuCI is essential to their being able to use LEDE, which makes sense since without LuCI is all command line work, while LuCI is a friendlier GUI. Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
