I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that can't fit
luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that people are
pointed at.
Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if forced to
choose, I would say they should have luci
David Lang
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Adrian Panella
wrote:
Totally agree with the observation.
+1 for including LuCI as default.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
Jo-Philipp Wich
Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m.
To: lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
Hi,
it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would
give more testing exposure to the ui...
My observation on the matter is this:
People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from
source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be
unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...)
So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await
further feedback on it.
~ Jo
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
