On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 12:35 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
With Imagebuilder and things pre
On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 12:35 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
> >>> With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create an
image? I'm wondering if this is something that can be converted to
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:34 -0400, Aaron Z wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
> > With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create an
> > image? I'm wondering if this is something that can be converted to a web UI
> > where we could have someone sele
Hi David,
Thanks for the good info on wear levelling; apparently I was misinformed
on the topic.
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 01:03 -0700, David Lang wrote: [snip]
> >>> To a certain extent though, I question the need for something as
> >>> restricted as OpenWrt
> >>> for the new bigger devices anywa
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Aaron Z wrote:
it would be nice to have Nano installed by default (hard to
use vi over ssh from a phone that doesn't have an escape key :D).
If you are using Android, look at the hacker keyboard
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.pocketworkstation.pckeyboar
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, David Lang wrote:
> With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create an
> image? I'm wondering if this is something that can be converted to a web UI
> where we could have someone select stuff (or upload a config file) and have
> the system sp
Hi,
> With Imagebuilder and things pre-compiled, what does it take to create
> an image? I'm wondering if this is something that can be converted to a
> web UI where we could have someone select stuff (or upload a config
> file) and have the system spit out a custom tailored image a few seconds
>
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 11:05 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
Again I think you read too much into what I said (admittedly I do the
s
On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 11:05 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> no need to overreact :) I think parts of the topics are about the
> >
> > Hope you're referring to Pinney
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
Hi,
no need to overreact :) I think parts of the topics are about the
Hope you're referring to Pinney and not me! I was concerned because
Dave Taht's email and David Lang's post) s
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 11:17 +0200, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no need to overreact :) I think parts of the topics are about the
Hope you're referring to Pinney and not me! I was concerned because
Dave Taht's email and David Lang's post) seemed to me to imply changing the
defaults to sui
Hi,
no need to overreact :) I think parts of the topics are about the
general availability of choices and not necessarily making them the default.
Imho most parts of CeroWrt can be replicated by using the ImageBuilder
to repack images with various components swapped (e.g. lighttpd vs.
uhttpd) an
Much like the convention of prefixing your subject line with [PATCH]
messages like this should be required to have a prefix such as
[DRIVEL] for effective filtering
lede integration issues ??
I don't see why there IS an issue CeroWrt died for good reason(s) ... such as :
Low return on investment
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your
> problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the
> primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which
> ar
Hi Dave,
Am Sun, 12 Jun 2016 08:23:04 -0700
schrieb Dave Taht :
> Groovy. There are quite a few other devices that have POE (edgerouter
> is the first that comes to mind), perhaps this can be built on
> generically?
here should be the proper place (it was changed after my patch):
https://git.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Lars Kruse wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
>> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe
>>
>> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5
>> radios, if anything?
>
> I submitted a patch (that was accepted) for GPIO-based POE
On 11.06.2016 19:44, Dave Taht wrote:
> E) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/gdisk
>
> The principal problem with fdisk nowadays is that very large (> 2TB, I
> think) devices are not supported by it, and require a GPT capable
> tool. Is there a replacement in lede that h
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:56 PM, David Lang wrote:
> Even low-end devices now include a USB port, and it's really easy to plugi
> in an external USB drive that's >2TB. 3TB drives are now <$100
>
> Now, if support for larger drives really does add a lot to the system
> footprint, it should be optio
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
Hi Dave,
I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your
problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the
primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which
are really quite small a
Hi Dave,
I don't speak for the LEDE team, but it looks to me a lot of your
problem is that you are using LEDE/openwrt for far bigger iron than the
primary target (standard routers, including pre-AC non-NAND ones, which
are really quite small and low powered). 2 TB+ storage for example, or
using l
Hi Dave,
> D) https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10/tree/master/utils/nanom5poe
>
> I don't know what landed upstream to control poe for the nano-m5
> radios, if anything?
I submitted a patch (that was accepted) for GPIO-based POE control - at least
for Nanostations XM/XW and for TP-Link CP
happy to see cake working today! thx all!
In https://github.com/dtaht/ceropackages-3.10:
A) We have flent's tc-iterate.c as a fast, lightweight means of
polling fq_codel, pie, cake stats (as the shell in openwrt doesn't
support a subsecond sleep) for openwrt.
(However this package and code is in
23 matches
Mail list logo
